Behind the numbers: Inverse probability weighting

Radiology

Volumn 271, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 625-628

  Halpern, Elkan F ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SURVIVAL; CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVERSE PROBABILITY WEIGHTING; LIVER CELL CARCINOMA; LIVER RESECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CARCINOMA, HEPATOCELLULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MALE;

EID: 84901669645     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140035     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Yang HJ, Lee JH, Lee DH, et al. Small single nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of transarterial chemoembolization, radiofre-quency ablation, and hepatic resection. Radiology 2014;271(3):909-918.
2. McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, Carter RE. Behind the numbers: propensity score analysis-a primer for the diagnostic radiologist. Radiology 2013;269(3):640-645.
3. Curtis LH, Hammill BG, Eisenstein EL, Kramer JM, Anstrom KJ. Using inverse probability-weighted estimators in comparative effectiveness analyses with observational databases. Med Care 2007;45(10 Suppl 2):S103-S107.
4. Cassel CM, Sarndal CE, Wretman JH. Some uses of statistical models in connection with the nonresponse problem. In: Madow WG, Olkin I, eds. Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys, Vol 3: Symposium on Incomplete Data, Proceedings. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1983.
5. Rosenbaum PR. Model-based direct adjustment. J Am Stat Assoc 1987;82(398):387-394.
6. Hirano K, Imbens GW. Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: an application to data on right heart catheteriza-tion. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 2001;2(3-4):259-278.