A framework for setting local restoration priorities based on landscape context

Natureza a Conservacao

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 152-157

  Tambosi, Leandro Reverberi ^a   Metzger, Jean Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Graph theory; Landscape connectivity; Multi scale approach; Restoration planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901669289     PISSN: 16790073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4322/natcon.2013.024     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Banks-Leite C et al., 2011. Comparing species and measures of landscape structure as indicators of conservation importance. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48: 706-714. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01966.x
2. Bell SS, Fonseca MS & Motten LB, 1997. Linking restoration and landscape ecology. Restoration Ecology, 5: 318-323. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.00545.x
3. Boscolo D & Metzger JP, 2009. Is bird incidence in Atlantic Forest fragments influenced by landscape patterns at multiple scales? Landscape Ecology, 24: 907-918. http: // dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9370-8
4. Brancalion PHS et al., 2012. Estraté gias para auxiliar na conservação de florestas tropicais secundá rias inseridas em paisagens alteradas. Boletim Museu Paraense Emí lio Goeldi Ciê ncias Naturais, 7: 219-234.
5. Crossman ND & Bryan BA, 2009. Systematic landscape restoration using integer programming. Biological Conservation, 128: 369-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/). biocon.2005.10.004
6. Ewers RM & Didham RK, 2006. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews, 81: 117-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S1464793105006949
7. Gama FV et al., 2013. Site selection for restoration planning: a protocol with landscape and legislation based alternatives. Natureza & Consevação, 11: 158-169.
8. Hobbs RJ & Norton DA, 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology, 4: 93-110. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1996.tb00112.x
9. Hobbs RJ, Higgs E & Harris JA, 2009. Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24: 599-605. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.012
10. Holl KD & Aide TM, 2011. When and where to actively restore ecosystems? Forest Ecology and Management, 261: 1558-1563. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.004
11. Holl KD, Crone EE & Schultz CB, 2003. Landscape restoration: Moving from generalities to methodologies. BioScience, 53: 491-502. http://dx.doi. org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0491: LRMFGT]2.0.CO; 2
12. Holvorcem CGD et al., 2011. Anchor areas to improve conservation and increase connectivity within the brazilian " Mesopotamia of biodiversity" . Natureza & Conservação, 9: 225-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/natcon.2011.030
13. Leite MS et al., 2013. Landscape ecology perspective in restoration projects for biodiversity conservation: a review. Natureza & Consevação, 11: 108-118.
14. Menz MHM, Dixon KW & Hobbs RJ, 2013. Hurdles and opportunities for landscape-scale restoration. Science, 339: 526-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1228334
15. Metzger JP et al., 2009. Time-lag in biological responses to landscape changes in a highly dynamic Atlantic forest region. Biological Conservation, 142: 1166-1177. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.033
16. Pardini R et al., 2010. Beyond the Fragmentation Threshold Hypothesis: Regime Shifts in Biodiversity Across Fragmented Landscapes. PLoS ONE, 5.
17. Rodrigues RR & Bononi VLR, 2008. Diretrizes para conservação e restauração da biodiversidade no Estado de São Paulo. São Paulo: Instituto de Botâ nica
18. Rodrigues RR et al., 2011. Large-scale ecological restoration of high-diversity tropical forests in SE Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 261: 1605-1613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. foreco.2010.07.005
19. Saura S & Pascual-Hortal L, 2007. A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83: 91-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.005
20. Tambosi LR et al., 2014. A framework to optimize biodiversity restoration efforts based on habitat amount and landscape connectivity. Restoration Ecology. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1111/ rec.12049
21. Tilman D et al., 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371: 65-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/371065a0
22. United Nations-UN, 2012. Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. Available from: < http: //www.uncsd2012.org/content/ documents/814UNCSD%20REPORT%20final%20revs.pdf> .
23. Urban D & Keitt T, 2001. Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology, 82: 1205-1218. http://dx.doi. org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205: LCAGTP]2.0.CO; 2