Alcohol use trajectories among Non-treatment-seeking heavy drinkers

Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 415-422

  Witkiewitz, Katie ^a   Dearing, Ronda L ^b   Maisto, Stephen A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE ON ADDICTIONS   (United States)

^c SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TRENDS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MARKOV CHAINS; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901653947     PISSN: 19371888     EISSN: 19384114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.415     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., & Monteiro, M. G. (2001). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identifi cation Test: Guidelines for use in primary care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/who_msd_msb_01.6a.pdf
3. Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338-363.
4. Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9, 3-29.
5. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fi t indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
6. Böckenholt, U. (2005). A latent Markov model for the analysis of longitudinal data collected in continuous time: States, durations, and transitions. Psychological Methods, 10, 65-83.
7. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. Clifford, P. R., & Maisto, S. A. (2000). Subject reactivity effects and alcohol treatment outcome research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 787-793.
9. COMBINE Study Research Group. (2003). Testing combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions in alcohol dependence: Rationale and methods. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 27, 1107-1122.
10. Dawson, D. A., Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., Chou, P. S., Huang, B., & Ruan, W. J. (2005). Recovery from DSM-IV alcohol dependence: United States, 2001-2002. Addiction, 100, 281-292.
11. Dearing, R. L., Witkiewitz, K., Connors, G. J., & Walitzer, K. S. (2013). Prospective changes in alcohol use among hazardous drinkers in the absence of treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 52-61.
12. de Bruijn, C., van den Brink, W., de Graaf, R., & Vollebergh, W. A. M. (2006). The three year course of alcohol use disorders in the general population: DSM-IV, ICD-10 and the Craving Withdrawal Model. Addiction, 101, 385-392.
13. Edlund, M. J., Booth, B. M., & Feldman, Z. L. (2009). Perceived need for treatment for alcohol use disorders: Results from two national surveys. Psychiatric Services, 60, 1618-1628.
14. Fleming, M. F., Balousek, S. L., Grossberg, P. M., Mundt, M. P., Brown, D., Wiegel, J. R., Saewyc, E. M. (2010). Brief physician advice for heavy drinking college students: A randomized controlled trial in college health clinics. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71, 23-31.
15. Fleming, M. F., Barry, K. L., Manwell, L. B., Johnson, K., & London, R. (1997). Brief physician advice for problem alcohol drinkers: A randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care practices. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1039-1045.
16. Hansen, A. B. G., Becker, U., Nielsen, A. S., Grønbæk, M., Tolstrup, J. S., & Thygesen, L. C. (2012). Internet-based brief personalized feedback intervention in a non-treatment-seeking population of adult heavy drinkers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14, e98.
17. Hasin, D. S., Stinson, F. S., Ogburn, E., & Grant, B. F. (2007). Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in the United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 830-842.
18. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fi t indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
19. Jenkins, R. J., McAlaney, J., & McCambridge, J. (2009). Change over time in alcohol consumption in control groups in brief intervention studies: Systematic review and meta-regression study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 100, 107-114.
20. Klingemann, H. K., & Sobell, L. C. (2007). Promoting self-change from addictive behaviors: Practical implications for policy, prevention, and treatment. New York, NY: Springer.
21. Klingemann, H., Sobell, M. B., & Sobell, L. C. (2010). Continuities and changes in self-change research. Addiction, 105, 1510-1518.
22. Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767-778.
23. Lowman, C., Allen, J., & Stout, R. L., & The Relapse Research Group. (1996). Replication and extension of Marlatt's taxonomy of relapse precipitants: Overview of procedures and results. Addiction, 91, Supplement, S51-S71.
24. Maisto, S. A., Clifford, P. R., & Davis, C. M. (2007). Alcohol treatment research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects: Part II. Treatment engagement and involvement. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68, 529-533.
25. Mojtabai, R., & Crum, R. M. (2013). Perceived unmet need for alcohol and drug use treatments and future use of services: Results from a longitudinal study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 127, 59-64.
26. Moss, H. B., Chen, C. M., & Yi, H.-Y. (2010). Prospective follow-up of empirically derived alcohol dependence subtypes in wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC): Recovery status, alcohol use disorders and diagnostic criteria, alcohol consumption behavior, health status, and treatment seeking. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 34, 1073-1083.
27. Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882-891.
28. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus users guide (Version 7). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
29. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 535-569.
30. Project MATCH Research Group. (1997). Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 7-29.
31. Robins, L. N., Cottler, L. B., Bucholz, K. K., Compton, W. M., North, C. S., & Rourke, K. M. (2000). Diagnostic Interview Schedule for the DSM-IV (DIS-IV). St. Louis, MO: Washington University.
32. Robins, L. N., Wing, J., Wittchen, H. U., Helzer, J. E., Babor, T. F., Burke, J., Towle, L. H. (1988). The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 1069-1077.
33. Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identifi cation Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791-804.
34. Saunders, S. M., Zygowicz, K. M., & D'Angelo, B. R. (2006). Personrelated and treatment-related barriers to alcohol treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30, 261-270.
35. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
36. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
37. Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1992). Timeline Follow-Back: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption (pp. 41-72). In R. Z. Litten and J. P. Allen (Eds.), Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biological methods. Totowa, NJ: Human Press.
38. Sobell, L. C., Sobell, M. B., Leo, G. I., Agrawal, S., Johnson-Young, L., & Cunningham, J. A. (2002). Promoting self-change with alcohol abusers: A community-level mail intervention based on natural recovery studies. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 26, 936-948.
39. Tucker, J. A., & Simpson, C. A. (2011). The recovery spectrum: From selfchange to seeking treatment. Alcohol Research & Health, 33, 371-379.
40. UKATT Research Team. (2001). United Kingdom Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT): Hypotheses, design and methods. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 36, 11-21.
41. van Amsterdam, J., & van den Brink, W. (2013). The high harm score of alcohol. Time for drug policy to be revisited? Journal of Psychopharmacology, 27, 248-255.
42. Witkiewitz, K. (2008). Lapses following alcohol treatment: Modeling the falls from the wagon. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69, 594-604.
43. Witkiewitz, K., Maisto, S. A., & Donovan, D. M. (2010). A comparison of methods for estimating change in drinking following alcohol treatment. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 34, 2116-2125.
44. World Health Organization. (2004). Global Status Report on Alcohol 2004. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
45. World Health Organization. (2011). Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.