Life cycle assessment of rice straw-based power generation in Malaysia

Energy

Volumn 70, Issue , 2014, Pages 401-410

  Shafie, S M ^a,b   Masjuki, H H ^a   Mahlia, T M I ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^b Universiti Utara Malaysia   (Malaysia)

^c Universiti Tenaga Nasional   (Malaysia)

^d SYIAH KUALA UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

LCA (life cycle assessment); Malaysia; Power generation; Rice straw

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; EUTROPHICATION; LIFE CYCLE; NATURAL GAS; POWER GENERATION;

EMISSION SAVING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; GENERATE ELECTRICITY; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); MALAYSIA; NATURAL GAS BASED; OPEN BURNING; RICE STRAWS;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

ACIDIFICATION; BIOMASS POWER; CLIMATE CHANGE; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; EMISSION CONTROL; EUTROPHICATION; GREENHOUSE GAS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; NATURAL GAS; RICE; STRAW;

MALAYSIA;

EID: 84901651576     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Shamsuddin A.H. Development of renewable energy in Malaysia strategic initiatives for carbon reduction in the power generation sector. Procedia Eng 2012, 49:384-391.
2. 2 reduction target. Renew Energy 2010, 35(11):2562-2570.
3. Mohamed A.R., Lee K.T. Energy for sustainable development in Malaysia: energy policy and alternative energy. Energy Policy 2006, 34(15):2388-2397.
4. National green technology policy 2011, [cited 2011 13 November]; Available from:. http://www.greentechmalaysia.my/index.php/green-technology/green-technology-policy/national-green-techology-policy.html.
5. Hashim H., Ho W.S. Renewable energy policies and initiatives for a sustainable energy future in Malaysia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:4780-4787.
6. Abdel-Mohdy F.A., et al. Rice straw as a new resources for some beneficial uses. Carbohydr Polym 2009, 75(1):44-51.
7. Carlos R.M., Khang D.B. Characterization of biomass energy projects in Southeast Asia. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32(6):525-532.
8. Paddy Straw programme 2011, [cited 2011 7 November]; Available from:. http://www.mada.gov.my/web/guest/236.
9. Vargas-Morenoa J.M., et al. Areview of the mathematical models for predicting the heating value of biomass materials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012, 16:3065-3083.
10. Prasertsan S., Sajjakulnukit B. Biomass and biogas energy in Thailand: potential, opportunity and barriers. Renew Energy 2006, 31(5):599-610.
11. Singh J., Panesar B.S., Sharma S.K. Energy potential through agricultural biomass using geographical information system-a case study of Punjab. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32(4):301-307.
12. Gadde B., Menke C., Wassmann R. Rice straw as a renewable energy source in India, Thailand, and the Philippines: overall potential and limitations for energy contribution and greenhouse gas mitigation. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33(11):1532-1546.
13. Kargbo F.R., Xing J., Zhang Y. Property analysis and pretreatment of rice straw for energy use in grain drying: a review. Agric Biol J N Am 2010, 1(3):195-200.
14. Valerio V, V A., Nanna F, Barisano D. Chemical characterisation of biomass feedstocks for the gasifier test. In: Task 5.3. Biomass selection and characterisation, Braccio G, Editor, Sezione Energia da Biomasse.
15. Fu P., et al. Evaluation of the porous structure development of chars from pyrolysis of rice straw: effects of pyrolysis temperature and heating rate. JAnal Appl Pyrol 2012, 98:177-183.
16. Chou C.-S., Lin S.-H., Lu W.-C. Preparation and characterization of solid biomass fuel made from rice straw and rice bran. Fuel Process Technol 2009, 90(7-8):980-987.
17. Kadam K.L., Forrest L.H., Jacobson W.A. Rice straw as a lignocellulosic resource: collection, processing, transportation, and environmental aspects. Biomass Bioenergy 2000, 18:369-389.
18. Suramaythangkoor T., Gheewala S.H. Potential alternatives of heat and power technology application using rice straw. Appl Energy 2010, 87:128-133.
19. Wei-Hua Y., et al. CO2 emission reduction and energy recovery from straw cogeneration project. Bioinformatics and biomedical engineering 2009.
20. Malaysia economics statistics 2009, Department of Statistics Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
21. Nori H., Halim R.A., Ramlan M.F. Effects of nitrogen fertilization management practice on the yield and straw nutritional quality of commercial rice varieties. Malays J Math Sci 2008, 2(2):61-71.
22. Xu Y., et al. Agronomic performance of late-season rice under different tillage, straw, and nitrogen management. Field Crops Res 2010, 115(1):79-84.
23. Suramaythangkoor T., Gheewala S.H. Potential of practical implementation of rice straw-based power generation in Thailand. Energy Policy 2008, 36:3193-3197.
24. Kasmaprapruet S., et al. Life cycle assessment of milled rice production:Case study in Thailand. Eur J Sci Res 2009, 30(2):195-203.
25. Silalertruksa T., et al. Life cycle GHG analysis of rice straw bio-DME production and application in Thailand. Appl Energy 2013.
26. Ekman A., et al. Possibilities for sustainable biorefineries based on agricultural residues - a case study of potential straw-based ethanol production in Sweden. Appl Energy 2013, 102:299-308.
27. Delivand M.K., et al. Environmental and socio-economic feasibility assessment of rice straw conversion to power and ethanol in Thailand. JClean Prod 2012, 37:29-41.
28. Roy P., et al. Atechno-economic and environmental evaluation of the life cycle of bioethanol produced from rice straw by RT-CaCCO process. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 37:188-195.
29. Shie J.-L., et al. Energy life cycle assessment of rice straw bio-energy derived from potential gasification technologies. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:6735-6741.
30. Liu H., et al. Comprehensiveevaluationofeffectsofstraw-basedelectricitygeneration: a Chinese case. Energy Policy 2010, 38:6153-6160.
31. Muench S., Guenther E. Asystematic review of bioenergy life cycle assessments. Appl Energy 2013, 112:257-273.
32. Renó Maria Luiza Grillo, et al. ALCA (life cycle assessment) of the methanol production from sugarcane bagasse. Energy 2011, 36:3716-3726.
33. Ali R., Daut I., Taib S. Areview on existing and future energy sources for electrical power generation in Malaysia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012, 16:4047-4055.
34. Chauhan M.K., et al. Life cycle assessment of sugar industry:A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:3445-3453.
35. Corstena Mariëlle, et al. Environmental impact assessment of CCS chains - lessons learned and limitations from LCA literature. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2013, 13:59-71.
36. Turconi Roberto, Boldrin Alessio, Astrup Thomas Life cycle assessment(LCA)of electricity generation technologies: overview, comparability and limitations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013, 28:555-565.
37. Blengini G.A., Busto M. The life cycle of rice: LCA of alternative agri-food chain management systems in Vercelli (Italy). JEnviron Manag 2009, 90:1512-1522.
38. Ramjeawon T. Life cycle assessment of electricity generation from bagasse in Mauritius. JClean Prod 2008, 16:1727-1734.
39. Nguyen T.L.T., Gheewala S.H., Bonnet S. Life cycle cost analysis of fuel ethanol produced from cassava in Thailand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2008, 13:564-573.
40. Davis S.C., Anderson-Teixeira K.J., Delucia E.H. Life-cycle analysis and ecology of biofuels. Trends Plant Sci 2009, 14(3):140-146.
41. DOE Paddy statistics of Malaysia 2011 2012, 141. Department of agriculture, Kuala Lumpur.
42. MOA Crops statistic report. Paddy statistic of Malaysia 2013, [cited 2013 May 25]; Available from:. http://www.doa.gov.my/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=8b3bb7ed-4363-4471-b760-6f528e6273dc%26groupId=38371.
43. Fertilizer use crop 2007, Food and agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
44. Selected indicators of food agricultural development in Asian-Pasific region 1996-2006 2007, Food and agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Bangkok.
45. Bockari-Gevoa S.M., et al. Analysis of energy consumption in lowland rice -based cropping system of Malaysia. JSci Technol 2005, 27(4):819-826.
46. MADA Rice straw production project in MUDA area 2011.
47. Kargbo F.R., Xing J., Zhang Y. Pretreatment for energy use of rice straw: a review. Afr J Agric Res 2009, 4(13):1560-1565.
48. Laporan projek pengkomposan jerami padi menggunakan cacing kerjasama JAS dan MADA 2004, Kedah. MADA (Ed.).
49. Delivand M.K., Barz M., Gheewala S.H. Logistics cost analysis of rice straw for biomass power generation in Thailand. Energy 2011, 36:1435-1441.
50. Jittima-Prasra A. Comparative life cycle assessment of rice husk utilization in Thailand 2009, School of Global Studies, Social Science and Planning College, RMIT University.
51. Ahmad F. Sustainable agriculture system in Malaysia, in regional workshop on integrated plant nutrition system (IPNS) 2001, Bangkok, Thailand.
52. NREL Life cycle inventory database 2012, NREL, United States. NREL (Ed.).
53. DOE Air pollution index management system 2012, [cited 2012 5 July]; Available from:. http://www.doe.gov.my/.
54. FOASTAT Fertilizer use by crop 2007, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 5th edn.
55. MADA Lembaga Kemajuan Pertanian Muda 2012, [cited 2011 5 May]; Available from:. http://www.mada.gov.my/.
56. Saga K., Imou K., Yokoyama S., Minowa T. Net energy analysis of ethanol production system from high-yield rice plant in Malaysia. Appl Energy 2010, 87(7):2164-2168.
57. Abdullah A.M. Acost analysis of paddy transportation and distribution systems in Muda Agricultural Development Authority Granary Area. Agriculture 2006, University Putra Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
58. Martensson L. Emissions from Volvo's trucks (Standard diesel fuel) 2003, V.T. Corporation (Ed.).
59. EPA Direct emissions from mobile combustion sources, in climate leaders greenhouse gas inventory protocol core module guidance 2008, Office of air and Radiation, United States.
60. Domalski E.S., Jobe T.L., Milne T.A. Thermodynamic data for biomass conversion and waste incineration 1986, National Bureau of standards Solar Energy research Institute, US.
61. KeTTHA Natural gas in power generation 2011, [cited 2013 26 June]; Available from:. http://www.kettha.gov.my/en/content/natural-gas-power-generation.
62. EPA Direct emissions from stationary combustion sources, in climate leaders greenhouse gas inventory rotocol core module guidance 2008, United States environmental Protection Agency, United States.
63. EPA Chapter 1: external combustion sources. AP 42 emission Factor 2003, US environmental Protection Agency, United States.
64. Kalinci Yildiz, Hepbasli Arif, Dincer I. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from biomass gasification systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:14026-14039.
65. Sultana A., Kumar A. Development of energy and emission parameters for densified form of lignocellulosic biomass. Energy 2011, 36:2716-2732.
66. Koga N., Tajima R. Assessing energy efficiencies and greenhouse gas emissions under bioethanol-oriented paddy rice production in northern Japan. JEnviron Manag 2011, 93(3):967-973.
67. Pishgar-Komleh Seyyed Hassan, Omid Mahmoud, Heidari M.D. On the study of energy use and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in greenhouse cucumber production in Yazd province. Energy 2013, 59:63-71.
68. Hu Jianjun, et al. Economic, environmental and social assessment of briquette fuel from agricultural residues in China e A study on flat die briquetting using corn stalk. Energy 2014, 64:557-566.
69. Miller P., Kumar A. Development of emission parameters and net energy ratio for renewable diesel from Canola and Camelina. Energy 2013, 58:426-437.
70. Sebastián F., Royo J., Gómez M. Cofiring versus biomass-fired power plants: GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions savings comparison by means of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) methodology. Energy 2011, 36:2029-2037.
71. Norton B. Renewable electricity-what is the true cost?. Power Eng J 1999, 6-12.
72. Chungsangunsit T., Gheewala S.H., Patumsawad S. Emission assessment of rice husk combustion for power production. Int J Civ Environ Eng 2010, 2(4):185-199.
73. Devlin Ger, Klvac Radomir, McDonnell K. Fuel efficiency and CO2 emissions of biomass based haulage in Ireland-A case study. Energy 2013, 54:55-62.
74. Tabata T., Okuda T. Life cycle assessment of woody biomass energy utilization: case study in Gifu Prefecture, Japan. Energy 2012, 45:944-951.
75. Prasana-A J., Grant T. Comparative life cycle assessment of uses of rice husk for energy purposes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2011.
76. Chungsangunsit T., Gheewala S.H., Patumsawad S. Environmental profile of power generation from rice husk in Thailand. Sustainable Energy and Environment (SEE) 2004, 739-742. Thailand.
77. Hartmann D., Kaltschmitt M. Electricity generation from solid biomass via co-combustion with coal: energy and emission balances from a German case study. Biomass Bioenergy 1999, 16(6):397-406.
78. Gadde B., et al. Air pollutant emissions from rice straw open field burning in India, Thailand and the Philippines. Environ Pollut 2009, 157(5):1554-1558.
79. Restrepo Á., et al. Exergetic and environmental analysis of a pulverized coal power plant. Energy 2012, 45:195-202.
80. Soimakallio Sampo, Kiviluoma Juha, Saikku L. The complexity and challenges of determining GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions from grid electricity consumption and conservation in LCA (life cycle assessment) - a methodological review. Energy 2011, 36:6705-6713.
81. Shekarchian M., et al. Areview on the pattern of electricity generation and emission in Malaysia from 1976 to 2008. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:2629-2642.
82. ETP Economic transformation programme a roadmap for Malaysia 2012, 167-205. Performance management & Delivery Unit (Pemandu), Kuala Lumpur.
83. Rahman D.Z.A., et al. Malaysia environment quality report 2011 2011, Department of environment, Kuala Lumpur.
84. Pihl E., et al. Highly efficient electricity generation from biomass by integration and hybridization with combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants for natural gas. Energy 2010, 35(10):4042-4052.
85. Umar M.S., Jennings P., Urmee T. Sustainable electricity generation from oil palm biomass wastes in Malaysia: an industry survey. Energy 2014, 67:496-505.