Group space allowance has little effect on sow health, productivity, or welfare in a free-access stall system

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 92, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 2554-2567

  Mack, L A ^a   Lay Jr , D C ^b   Eicher, S D ^b   Johnson, A K ^c   Richert, B T ^a   Pajor, E A ^d  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Behavior; Free access stall; Housing; Sow; Space; Welfare

Indexed keywords

HYDROCORTISONE;

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL WELFARE; BLOOD; FEMALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PIG; PREGNANCY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; BLOOD; FEMALE; HOUSING, ANIMAL; HYDROCORTISONE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SWINE;

EID: 84901627093     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-7352     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Andersen, I. L., K. E. Bøe, and A. L. Kristiansen. 1999. The influence of different feeding arrangements and food type on competition at feeding in pregnant sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65:91-104.
2. Anil, L., S. S. Anil, J. Deen, and S. K. Baidoo. 2006. Cortisol, behavioral responses, and injury scores of sows housed in gestation stalls. J. Swine Health Prod. 14:196-201.
3. Arey, D. S. 1999. Time course for the formation and disruption of social organization in group-housed sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 62:199-207.
4. Arey, D. S., and S. A. Edwards. 1998. Factors influencing aggression between sows after mixing and the consequences for welfare and production. Livest. Prod. Sci. 56:61-70.
5. Arnaout, M. A. 1990. Structure and function of the leukocyte adhesion molecules CD11/CD18. Blood 75:1037-1050.
6. Backus, G. B. C., H. M. Vermeer, P. F. M. M. Roelofs, P. C. Vesseur, J. H. A. N. Adams, G. P. Binnendijk, J. J. Smeets, C. M. C. van der Peet-Schwering, and F. J. van der Wilt. 1997. Comparison of four housing systems for non-lactating sows. Res. Inst. Pig Husb., Rosmalen, The Netherlands. p. 1-12.
7. Barnett, J. L., G. M. Cronin, T. H. McCallum, and E. A. Newman. 1993. Effects of pen size/shape and design on aggression when grouping unfamiliar adult pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 36:111-122.
8. Barnett, J. L., P. H. Hemsworth, G. M. Cronin, E. A. Newman, T. H. McCallum, and D. Chilton. 1992. Effects of pen size, partial stalls and method of feeding on welfare-related behavioral and physiological responses of group-housed pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 34:207-220.
9. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 57:289-300.
10. Coffey, R. D., G. R. Parker, and K. M. Laurent. 1999. Assessing sow body condition. Rep. No. ASC-158. Coop. Ext. Serv., Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington.
11. DeDecker, A. E. 2011. Effect of alternative, individual and group housing systems, and management factors in group pens on the well-being of gestating sows. PhD Diss. Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana.
12. Edwards, S. A., S. Mauchline, and A. H. Stewart. 1993. Designing pens to minimise aggression when sows are mixed. Farm Build. Prog. 113:20-23.
13. Eicher, S. D., I. V. Wesley, V. K. Sharma, and T. R. Johnson. 2010. Yeast cell-wall products containing β-glucan plus ascorbic acid affect neonatal Bos taurus calf leukocytes and growth after a transport stressor. J. Anim. Sci. 88:1195-1203.
14. Harris, M. J., E. A. Pajor, A. D. Sorrells, S. D. Eicher, B. T. Richert, and J. N. Marchant-Forde. 2006. Effects of stall or small group gestation housing on the production, health and behavior of gilts. Livest. Sci. 102:171-179.
15. Haussmann, M. F., J. A. Carroll, G. D. Weesner, M. J. Daniels, R. L. Matteri, and D. C. Lay. 2000. Administration of ACTH to restrained, pregnant sows alters their pigs hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. J. Anim. Sci. 78:2399-2411.
16. Hayter, A. J. 1984. A proof of the conjecture that the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons procedure is conservative. Ann. Stat. 12:61-75.
17. Hemsworth, P. H., J. L. Barnett, C. Hansen, and C. G. Winfeld. 1986. Effects of social-environment on welfare status and sexual-behavior of female pigs. 2. Effects of space allowance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16:259-267.
18. Hodgkiss, N. J., J. C. Eddison, P. H. Brooks, and P. Bugg. 1998. Assessment of the injuries sustained by pregnant sows housed in groups using electronic feeders. Vet. Rec. 143:604-607.
19. Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological fled experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54:187-211.
20. Jansen, J., R. N. Kirkwood, A. J. Zanella, and R. J. Tempelman. 2007. Infuence of gestation housing on sow behavior and fertility. J. Swine Health Prod. 15:132-136.
21. Jensen, P. 1984. Effects of confinement on social-interaction patterns in dry sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 12:93-101.
22. Jones, L. M. W. 2010. The influence of previous housing experience and social rank on sow preference for different types of stall housing. MS Thesis. Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN.
23. Karlen, G. A. M., P. H. Hemsworth, H. W. Gonyou, E. Fabrega, A. David Strom, and R. J. Smits. 2007. The welfare of gestating sows in conventional stalls and large groups on deep litter. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 105:87-101.
24. Kenward, M. G., and J. H. Roger. 1997. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983-997.
25. Kongsted, A. G., J. E. Hermansen, and T. Kristensen. 2007. Relation between parity and feed intake, fear of humans and social behavior in non-lactating sows group-housed under various on-farm conditions. Anim. Welf. 16:263-266.
26. Koolhaas, J. M., A. Bartolomucci, B. Buwalda, S. F. de Boer, G. Flügge, S. M. Korte, P. Meerlo, R. Murison, B. Olivier, P. Palanza, G. Richter-Levin, A. Sgoifo, T. Steimer, O. Stiedl, G. van Dijk, M. Wöhr, and E. Fuchs. 2011. Stress revisited: A critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35:1291-1301.
27. Littell, R. C., G. A. Miliken, W. W. Stroup, R. D. Wolfnger, and O. Schabenberber. 2006. SAS for mixed models. 2nd ed. SAS Publ., Cary, NC.
28. Luppi, P. 2003. How immune mechanisms are affected by pregnancy. Vaccine 21:3352-3357.
29. Lynch, P. B., L. Boyle, F. Leonard, A. Tergny, and P. Brophy. 2000. Studies on housing of pregnant sows in groups and individually. Project No. 4563. TEAGASC, Dublin.
30. Main, D. C. J., J. Clegg, A. Spatz, and L. E. Green. 2000. Repeatability of a lameness scoring system for finishing pigs. Vet. Rec. 147:574-576.
31. Marchant, J. N., and D. M. Broom. 1996. Effects of dry sow housing conditions on muscle weight and bone strength. Anim. Sci. 62:105-113.
32. Marchant-Forde, R. M., and J. N. Marchant-Forde. 2004. Pregnancy-related changes in behavior and cardiac activity in primiparous pigs. Physiol. Behav. 82:815-825.
33. Meese, G. B., and R. Ewbank. 1973. Establishment and nature of dominance hierarchy in domesticated pig. Anim. Behav. 21:326-334.
34. Piriou-Guzylack, L., and H. Salmon. 2008. Membrane markers of the immune cells in swine: An update. Vet. Res. 39:54.
35. Remience, V., J. Wavreille, B. Canart, M.-C. Meunier-Salaun, A. Prunier, N. Bartiaux-Thill, B. Nicks, and M. Vandenheede. 2008. Effects of space allowance on the welfare of dry sows kept in dynamic groups and fed with an electronic sow feeder. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 112:284-296.
36. Rhodes, R. T., M. C. Appleby, K. Chinn, L. Douglas, L. D. Firkins, K. A. Houpt, C. Irwin, J. J. McGlone, P. Sundberg, L. Tokach, and R. W. Wills. 2005. Task force report-A comprehensive review of housing for pregnant sows. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 227:1580-1590.
37. Meisinger, D. J., editor. 2010. National swine nutrition guide. U.S. Pork Cent. Excell., Des Moines, IA.
38. National Research Council. 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
39. Rima, B. N., M. Bardi, J. M. Friedenberg, L. M. Christon, K. E. Karelina, K. G. Lambert, and C. H. Kinsley. 2009. Reproductive experience and the response of female Sprague-Dawley rats to fear and stress. Comp. Med. 59:437-443.
40. Rioja-Lang, F. C., S. M. Hayne, and H. W. Gonyou. 2013. The effect of pen design on free space utilization of sows group housed in gestation pens equipped with free access stalls. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 148:93-98.
41. Salak-Johnson, J. L., A. E. DeDecker, M. J. Horsman, and S. L. Rodriguez-Zas. 2012. Space allowance for gestating sows in pens: Behavior and immunity. J. Anim. Sci. 90:3232-3242.
42. Salak-Johnson, J. L., S. R. Niekamp, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, M. Ellis, and S. E. Curtis. 2007. Space allowance for dry sows in pens: Body condition, skin lesions, and performance. J. Anim. Sci. 85:1758-1769.
43. Schabenberger, O. 2005. Introducing the GLIMMIX procedure for generalized linear mixed models. SUGI 30 Proc. SAS Inst. Inc., Philadelphia, PA.
44. Séguin, M. J., D. Barney, and T. M. Widowski. 2006. Assessment of a group-housing system for gestating sows: Effects of space allowance and pen size on the incidence of superficial skin lesions, changes in body condition, and farrowing performance. J. Swine Health Prod. 14:89-96.
45. St-Pierre, N. R. 2007. Design and analysis of pen studies in the animal sciences. J. Dairy Sci. 90(E. Suppl.):E87-E99.
46. Taylor, I. A., J. L. Barnett, and G. M. Cronin. 1997. Optimum group size for pigs. In: Livestock Environment V: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium: Hotel Softel Minneapolis. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., Bloomington, MN. p. 965-971.
47. Thodberg, K., K. H. Jensen, and M. S. Herskin. 2002a. Nursing behavior, postpartum activity and reactivity in sows: Effects of farrowing environment, previous experience and temperament. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 77:53-76.
48. Thodberg, K., K. H. Jensen, and M. S. Herskin. 2002b. Nest building and farrowing in sows: Relation to the reaction pattern during stress, farrowing environment and experience. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 77:21-42.
49. Turner, S. P., M. J. Farnworth, I. M. S. White, S. Brotherstone, M. Mendl, P. Knap, P. Penny, and A. B. Lawrence. 2006. The accumulation of skin lesions and their use as a predictor of individual aggressiveness in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 96:245-259.
50. Turner, S. P., M. Nath, G. W. Horgan, and S. A. Edwards. 2013. Measuring chronic social tension in groups of growing pigs using inter-individual distances. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 146:26-36.
51. Turner, S. P., R. Roehe, R. B. D'Eath, S. H. Ison, M. Farish, M. C. Jack, N. Lundeheim, L. Rydhmer, and A. B. Lawrence. 2009. Genetic validation of postmixing skin injuries in pigs as an indicator of aggressiveness and the relationship with injuries under more stable social conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 87:3076-3082.
52. Tuyttens, F. A. M., S. Van Gansbeke, and B. Ampe. 2011. Survey among Belgian pig producers about the introduction of group housing systems for gestating sows. J. Anim. Sci. 89:845-855.
53. van der Peet-Schwering, C. M. C., B. Kemp, G. P. Binnendijk, L. A. den Hartog, H. A. M. Spoolder, and M. W. A. Verstegen. 2003. Performance of sows fed high levels of nonstarch polysaccha-rides during gestation and lactation over three parities. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2247-2258.
54. Wagner, C., G. M. Hänsch, S. Stegmaier, B. Denefeh, F. Hug, and M. Schoels. 2001. The complement receptor 3, CR3 (CD11b/ CD18), on T lymphocytes: Activation-dependent up-regulation and regulatory function. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:1173-1180.
55. Wartella, J., E. Amory, A. Macbeth, I. McNamara, L. Stevens, K. G. Lambert, and C. H. Kinsley. 2003. Single or multiple reproductive experiences attenuate neurobehavioral stress and fear responses in the female rat. Physiol. Behav. 79:373-381.
56. Weedman, S. M., M. H. Rostagno, J. A. Patterson, I. Yoon, G. Fitzner, and S. D. Eicher. 2011. Yeast culture supplement during nursing and transport affects immunity and intestinal microbial ecology of weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 89:1908-1921.
57. Weiss, J. A. Y. M. 1968. Effects of coping responses on stress. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 65:251-260.
58. Weng, R. C., S. A. Edwards, and P. R. English. 1998. Behavior, social interactions and lesion scores of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 59:307-316.
59. Wright, S. D., R. A. Ramos, P. S. Tobias, R. J. Ulevitch, and J. C. Mathison. 1990. CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysac-charide (LPS) and LPS binding protein. Science 249:1431-1433.
60. Zurbrigg, K., and T. Blackwell. 2006. Injuries, lameness, and cleanliness of sows in four group-housing gestation facilities in Ontario. J. Swine Health Prod. 14:202-206.