Synergistic effects of bioremediation and electrokinetics in the remediation of petroleum-contaminated soil

Chemosphere

Volumn 109, Issue , 2014, Pages 226-233

  Guo, Shuhai ^a   Fan, Ruijuan ^a,b   Li, Tingting ^a   Hartog, Niels ^c   Li, Fengmei ^a   Yang, Xuelian ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c KWR WATERCYCLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^d SHENYANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bioremediation; Electrochemical stimulation; Electrokinetics; Microbial community; Total petroleum hydrocarbons

Indexed keywords

BIOREMEDIATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ELECTRODYNAMICS; ELECTROHYDRODYNAMICS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ELECTROOSMOSIS; GASOLINE; HYDROCARBONS; MICROORGANISMS; SOIL POLLUTION;

BIOLOGICAL DEGRADATION; ELECTROCHEMICAL STIMULATION; ELECTROKINETICS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURES; PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL; TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS;

SOILS;

DIESEL FUEL; GENOMIC DNA; HYDROCARBON; PETROLEUM; PETROLEUM DERIVATIVE; RNA 16S;

BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROCHEMICAL METHOD; ELECTROKINESIS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL TEMPERATURE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROCHEMICAL STIMULATION; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTROKINESIA; KINETICS; LOAM SOIL; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL TEMPERATURE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

BIOREMEDIATION; ELECTROCHEMICAL STIMULATION; ELECTROKINETICS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS;

BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNIQUES; ELECTRODES; HYDROCARBONS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; PETROLEUM; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; SOIL POLLUTANTS; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84901621214     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Acar Y. Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27:2638-2647.
2. Acar Y.B., Gale R.J., Alshawabkeh A.N., Marks R.E., Puppala S., Bricka M., Parker R. Electrokinetic remediation: basics and technology status. J. Hazard. Mater. 1995, 40:117-137.
3. Aciego Pietri J.C., Brookes P.C. Substrate inputs and pH as factors controlling microbial biomass, activity and community structure in an arable soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41:1396-1405.
4. Boopathy R. Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74:63-67.
5. Fan X.Y., Wang H., Luo Q.S., Ma J.W., Zhang X.H. The use of 2D non-uniform electric field to enhance in situ bioremediation of 2,4-dichlorophenol-contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 148:29-37.
6. Gomes H.I., Dias-Ferreira C., Ribeiro A.B. Electrokinetic remediation of organochlorines in soil: enhancement techniques and integration with other remediation technologies. Chemosphere 2012, 87:1077-1090.
7. Guerin T.F. Bioremediation of phenols and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in creosote contaminated soil using ex-situ land treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 1999, 65:305-315.
8. Haidar M., Dirany A., Sirés I., Oturan N., Oturan M.A. Electrochemical degradation of the antibiotic sulfachloropyridazine by hydroxyl radicals generated at a BDD anode. Chemosphere 2013, 91:1304-1309.
9. Harbottle M.J., Lear G., Sills G.C., Thompson I.P. Enhanced biodegradation of pentachlorophenol in unsaturated soil using reversed field electrokinetics. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:1893-1900.
10. Head I.M., Jones D.M., Röling W.F.M. Marine microorganisms make a meal of oil. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4:173-182.
11. Huang D.N., Guo S.H., Li T.T., Wu B. Coupling interactions between electrokinetics and bioremediation for pyrene removal from soil under polarity reversal conditions. Clean-Soil Air Water 2013, 41:383-389.
12. Jackman S.A., Maini G., Sharman A.K., Sunderland G., Knowles C.J. Electrokinetic movement and biodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in silt soil. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 74:40-48.
13. Jin S., Fallgren P.H. Electrically induced reduction of trichloroethene in clay. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 173:200-204.
14. Kim S.H., Han H.Y., Lee Y.J., Kim C.W., Yang J.W. Effect of electrokinetic remediation on indigenous microbial activity and community within diesel contaminated soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408:3162-3168.
15. Lear G., Harbottle M.J., van der Gast C.J., Jackman S.A., Knowles C.J., Sills G., Thompson I.P. The effect of electrokinetics on soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2004, 36:1751-1760.
16. Lear G., Harbottle M.J., Sills G., Knowles C.J., Semple K.T., Thompson I.P. Impact of electrokinetic remediation on microbial communities within PCP contaminated soil. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 146:139-146.
17. Li T.T., Guo S.H., Wu B., Li F.M., Niu Z.X. Effect of electric intensity on the microbial degradation of petroleum pollutants in soil. J. Environ. Sci. 2010, 22:1381-1386.
18. Li F.M., Guo S.H., Hartog N. Electrokinetics-enhanced biodegradation of heavy polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil around iron and steel industries. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 85:228-234.
19. Lima D., Viana P., André S., Chelinho S., Costa C., Ribeiro R., Sousa J., Fialho A., Viegas C. Evaluating a bioremediation tool for atrazine contaminated soils in open soil microcosms: the effectiveness of bioaugmentation and biostimulation approaches. Chemosphere 2009, 74:187-192.
20. Lladó S., Covino S., Solanas A., Viñas M., Petruccioli M., D'annibale A. Comparative assessment of bioremediation approaches to highly recalcitrant PAH degradation in a real industrial polluted soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 248:407-414.
21. Lu R.K. Analytic Methods for Soil Agricultural Chemistry 2000, China Agriculture Science and Technology Press, Beijing, p. 13.
22. Luo Q.S., Zhang X.H., Wang H., Qian Y. Mobilization of phenol and dichlorophenol in unsaturated soils by non-uniform electrokinetics. Chemosphere 2005, 59:1289-1298.
23. Luo Q.S., Zhang X.H., Wang H., Qian Y. The use of non-uniform electrokinetics to enhance in situ bioremediation of phenol-contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 121:187-194.
24. Luo Q.S., Wang H., Zhang X.H., Fan X.Y., Qian Y. In situ bioelectrokinetic remediation of phenol-contaminated soil by use of an electrode matrix and a rotational operation mode. Chemosphere 2006, 64:415-422.
25. Mana Capelli S., Busalmen J., De Sanchez S. Hydrocarbon bioremediation of a mineral-base contaminated waste from crude oil extraction by indigenous bacteria. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2001, 47:233-238.
26. Moliterni E., Rodriguez L., Fernández F.J., Villaseñor J. Feasibility of different bioremediation strategies for treatment of clayey and silty soils recently polluted with diesel hydrocarbons. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223:2473-2482.
27. Muyzer G., De Waal E.C., Uitterlinden A.G. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59:695-700.
28. Probstein R.F., Hicks R.E. Removal of contaminants from soils by electric fields. Science 1993, 260:498-503.
29. Rahner D., Ludwig G., Röhrs J. Electrochemically induced reactions in soils - a new approach to the in situ remediation of contaminated soils: Part 1: the microconductor principle. Electrochim. Acta 2002, 47:1395-1403.
30. Röhrs J., Ludwig G., Rahner D. Electrochemically induced reactions in soils - a new approach to the in situ remediation of contaminated soils: Part 2: remediation experiments with a natural soil containing highly chlorinated hydrocarbons. Electrochim. Acta 2002, 47:1405-1414.
31. Sarkar D., Ferguson M., Datta R., Birnbaum S. Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soils: comparison of biosolids addition, carbon supplementation, and monitored natural attenuation. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 136:187-195.
32. Shi L., Müller S., Loffhagen N., Harms H., Wick L.Y. Activity and viability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading Sphingomonas sp. LB126 in a DC-electrical field typical for electrobioremediation measures. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 1:53-61.
33. Simpson E.H. Measurement of diversity. Nature 1949, 163:688.
34. Tiehm A., Lohner S.T., Augenstein T. Effects of direct electric current and electrode reactions on vinyl chloride degrading microorganisms. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54:3453-3459.
35. Torres R.A., Torres W., Peringer P., Pulgarin C. Electrochemical degradation of p-substituted phenols of industrial interest on Pt electrodes: attempt of a structure-reactivity relationship assessment. Chemosphere 2003, 50:97-104.
36. Vorobyova E., Soina V., Gorlenko M., Minkovskaya N., Zalinova N., Mamukelashvili A., Gilichinsky D., Rivkina E., Vishnivetskaya T. The deep cold biosphere: facts and hypothesis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1997, 20:277-290.
37. Wick L.Y. Coupling electrokinetics to the bioremediation of organic contaminants: principles and fundamental interactions. Electrochemical Remediation Technologies for Polluted Soils, Sediments and Groundwater 2009, 369-388. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. K.R. Reddy, C. Cameselle (Eds.).
38. Wick L.Y., Mattle P.A., Wattiau P., Harms H. Electrokinetic transport of PAH-degrading bacteria in model aquifers and soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38:4596-4602.
39. Wick L.Y., Shi L., Harms H. Electro-bioremediation of hydrophobic organic soil-contaminants: a review of fundamental interactions. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52:3441-3448.
40. Wick L.Y., Buchholz F., Fetzer I., Kleinsteuber S., Hartig C., Shi L., Miltner A., Harms H., Pucci G.N. Responses of soil microbial communities to weak electric fields. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408:4886-4893.