Impact of MRI head placement on glioma response assessment

Journal of Neuro-Oncology

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 123-129

  Reuter, Martin ^a   Gerstner, Elizabeth R ^a   Rapalino, Otto ^a   Batchelor, Tracy T ^a   Rosen, Bruce ^a   Fischl, Bruce ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

High Grade Glioma; Macdonald criteria; MRI head placement; RANO; Reliability; Treatment assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER GROWTH; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLIOMA; HEAD POSITION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT RESPONSE; BRAIN TUMOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEAD; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY;

BRAIN NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLIOMA; HEAD; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84901616738     PISSN: 0167594X     EISSN: 15737373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1403-8     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Benner T, Wisco JJ, van der Kouwe AJW, Fischl B, Vangel MG, Hochberg FH, Sorensen AG (2006) Comparison of manual and automatic section positioning of brain MR images. Radiology 239(1):246-254. doi:10.1148/radiol.2391050221
2. Lin L (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45(1):255-268. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2532051
3. Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8(7):1277-1280. http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/8/7/1277.long (Pubitemid 20195640)
4. Reuter M, Rosas HD, Fischl B (2010) Highly accurate inverse consistent registration: a robust approach. Neuroimage 53(4):1181-1196. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.020
5. Shah GD et al (2006) Comparison of linear and volumetric criteria in assessing tumor response in adult high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 8(1):38-46 (Pubitemid 43154449)
6. Schmitt P, Mandonnet E, Perdreau A, Angelini ED (2013) Effects of slice thickness and head rotation when measuring glioma sizes on MRI: in support of volume segmentation versus two largest diameters methods. J Neuro-Oncol 112(2):165-172. doi:10.1007/s11060-013-1051-4
7. Thevenaz P, Blu T, Unser M (2000) Interpolation revisited. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19(7):739-758. doi:10.1109/42.875199
8. van den Bent MJ, Wefel JS, Schiff D, Taphoorn MJ, Jaeckle K, Junck L, Armstrong T, Choucair A, Waldman AD, Gorlia T, Chamberlain M, Baumert BG, Vogelbaum MA, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Wen PY, Chang SM, Jacobs AH (2011) Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Lancet Oncol 12(6):583-593. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70057-2
9. van der Kouwe AJ, Benner T, Fischl B, Schmitt F, Salat DH, Harder M, Sorensen AG, Dale AM (2005) On-line automatic slice positioning for brain MR imaging. Neuroimage 27(1):222-230. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.035 (Pubitemid 40966897)
10. van der Kouwe AJ, Benner T, Salat DH, Fischl B (2008) Brain morphometry with multiecho MPRAGE. Neuroimage 40(2):559-569. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007. 12.025
11. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, Degroot J, Wick W, Gilbert MR, Lassman AB, Tsien C, Mikkelsen T, Wong ET, Chamberlain MC, Stupp R, Lamborn KR, Vogelbaum MA, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28(11):1963-1972. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541
12. Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometr Bull 1(6):80-83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3001968
13. Wolak ME, Fairbairn DJ, Paulsen YR (2012) Guidelines for estimating repeatability. Methods Ecol Evol 3(1):129-137. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011. 00125.x