An extended compromise ratio model with an application to reservoir flood control operation under an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 38, Issue 14, 2014, Pages 3495-3511

  Hashemi, H ^a   Bazargan, J ^a   Mousavi, S Meysam ^b   Vahdani, Behnam ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZANJAN   (Iran)

^b SHAHED UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Compromise ratio model; Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs); Multiple attributes group decision making (MAGDM); Reservoir flood control operation

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODS;

APPLICATION EXAMPLES; FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS; INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS; INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY; MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE GROUP DECISION MAKINGS (MAGDM); MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTES GROUP DECISION MAKINGS; OBJECTIVE INFORMATION; RATIO MODELS;

FUZZY SETS;

EID: 84901609724     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2013.11.045     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 1965, 8:338-356.
2. Malekli H., Mousavi S.M., Hashemi H. A fuzzy integrated methodology for evaluating conceptual bridge design. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37(7):4910-4920.
3. Mousavi S.M., Jolai F., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R. A fuzzy stochastic multi-attribute group decision-making approach for selection problems. Group Decis. Negot. 2013, 22(2):207-233.
4. Mousavi S.M., Vahdani B., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R., Ebrahimnejad S., Amiri M. A multi-stage decision-making process for multiple attributes analysis under an interval-valued fuzzy environment. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 64(9-12):1263-1273.
5. Ebrahimnejad S., Mousavi S.M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R., Hashemi H., Vahdani B. A novel two-phase group decision-making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment. Appl. Math. Model. 2012, 36(9):4197-4217.
6. Vahdani B., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R., Mousavi S.M., Ghodratnama A. Soft computing based on new interval-valued fuzzy modified multi-criteria decision-making method. Appl. Soft Comput. 2013, 13(1):165-172.
7. Vahdani B., Mousavi S.M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R. Group decision making based on novel fuzzy modified TOPSIS method. Appl. Math. Model. 2011, 35(9):4257-4269.
8. Atanassov K. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1986, 20(1):87-96.
9. Vahdani B., Mousavi S.M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R., Hashemi H. A new design of the elimination and choice translating reality method for multi-criteria group decision-making in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl. Math. Model. 2013, 37(4):1781-1799.
10. Devi K. Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38(11):14163-14168.
11. Pei Z., Zheng L. A novel approach to multi-attribute decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39(3):2560-2566.
12. Atanassov K., Gargov G. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1989, 31(3):343-349.
13. Wang Z., Li K.W., Xu J. A mathematical programming approach to multi-attribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessment information. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38(10):12462-12469.
14. S. Opricovic, Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 1998.
15. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Theory and Applications 1992, Springer, Berlin.
16. Büyüközkan G., Arsenyan J., Ruan D. Logistics tool selection with two-phase fuzzy multi criteria decision making: a case study for personal digital assistant selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39(1):142-153.
17. Hashemi H., Mousavi S.M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R., Gholipour Y. A compromise ranking approach with bootstrap confidence intervals for risk assessment in port management projects. J. Manag. Eng. 2013, 29(4):334-344.
18. Mousavi S.M., Torabi S.A., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R. A hierarchical group decision-making approach for new product selection in a fuzzy environment. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2013, 38(11):3233-3248.
19. Ravindran A. Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Operations Research and Management Science Handbook 2007, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
20. Opricovic S., Tzeng G.H. Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Comput. Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 2002, 17(3):211-220.
21. Tzeng G.H., Lin C.W., Opricovic S. Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energy Policy 2005, 33(11):1373-1383.
22. Chang C.L., Hsu C.H. Multi-criteria analysis via the VIKOR method for prioritizing land-use restraint strategies in the Tseng-Wen reservoir watershed. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90(11):3226-3230.
23. Hashemi H., Bazargan J., Mousavi S.M. Compromise ratio method with an application to water resources management: an intuitionistic fuzzy set. Water Resour. Manage. 2013, 27(7):2029-2051.
24. Vahdani B., Hadipour H., Sadaghiani J.S., Amiri M. Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010, 47(9-12):1231-1239.
25. Opricovic S. Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38(10):12983-12990.
26. Liou J.J.H., Tsai C.Y., Lin R.H., Tzeng G.H. A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality. J. Air Transp. Manage. 2011, 17(2):57-61.
27. Vinodh S., Varadharajan A.R., Subramanian A. Application of fuzzy VIKOR for concept selection in an agile environment. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 65(5-8):825-832.
28. Mishra S., Samantra C., Datta S., Mahapatra S.S. Multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) for supplier selection using fuzzy linguistic modelling integrated with VIKOR method. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manage. 2012, 12(1):67-89.
29. Girubha R.J., Vinodh S. Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component. Mater. Des. 2012, 37:478-486.
30. Park J.H., Park Y., Kwun Y.C., Tan X. Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision making problems under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl. Math. Model. 2011, 35(5):2544-2556.
31. Park J.H., Cho H.J., Kwun Y.C. Extension of the VIKOR method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 2011, 10(3):233-253.
32. Yücenur G.N., Demirel N.Ç. Group decision making process for insurance company selection problem with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39(3):3702-3707.
33. Vahdani B., Mousavi S.M., Hashemi H., Mousakhani M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R. A new compromise solution method for fuzzy group decision-making problems with an application to the contractor selection. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2013, 26(2):779-788.
34. Opricovic S., Tzeng G.H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 156(2):445-455.
35. Opricovic S., Tzeng G.H. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 178(2):514-529.
36. Atanassov K. Operators over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1994, 64(2):159-174.
37. Xu Z.S. Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making. Control Decis. 2007, 22(2):215-219.
38. Yu D., Wu Y., Lu T. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized operators and their application in group decision making. Knowledge Based Syst. 2012, 30:57-66.
39. Ye J. Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on a novel accuracy function under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36(3-2):6899-6902.
40. Xu Z., Chen J. Approach to group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic judgment matrices. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 2007, 27(4):126-133.
41. Fu G. A fuzzy optimization method for multicriteria decision making: an application to reservoir flood control operation. Expert Syst. Appl. 2008, 34(1):145-149.