Impact of hyperaemic microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with stable coronary artery disease: Insights from combined stenosis and microvascular resistance assessment

Heart

Volumn 100, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 951-959

  Van De Hoef, Tim P ^a,b   Nolte, Froukje ^a   Echavarría Pinto, Mauro ^b   Van Lavieren, Martijn A ^a   Damman, Peter ^a   Chamuleau, Steven A J ^c   Voskuil, Michiel ^c   Verberne, Hein J ^a   Henriques, José P S ^a   Van Eck Smit, Berthe L F ^a   Koch, Karel T ^a   De Winter, Robbert J ^a   Spaan, Jos A E ^a   Siebes, Maria ^a   Tijssen, Jan G P ^a   Meuwissen, Martijn ^d   Piek, Jan J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d AMPHIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M; TETROFOSMIN TC 99M;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE; CORONARY VASCULAR RESISTANCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; HYPERAEMIC MICROVASCULAR RESISTANCE; HYPERAEMIC STENOSIS RESISTANCE; HYPEREMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR;

ADENOSINE; AGED; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; HYPEREMIA; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; VASCULAR RESISTANCE; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 84901608164     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305124     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Task Force M, Montalescot G, Sechtem U, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2949-3003.
2. Lanza GA, Crea F. Primary coronary microvascular dysfunction: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and management. Circulation 2010;121:2317-25.
3. Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2007;356:830-40.
4. Marzilli M, Merz CN, Boden WE, et al. Obstructive coronary atherosclerosis and ischemic heart disease: an elusive link! J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:951-6.
5. Meuwissen M, Chamuleau SAJ, Siebes M, et al. Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Circulation 2001;103:184-7. (Pubitemid 32095399)
6. Guarini G, Capozza PG, Huqi A, et al. Microvascular function/dysfunction downstream a coronary stenosis. Curr Pharm Des 2013;19:2366-74.
7. Chamuleau SAJ, Tio RA, de Cock CC, et al. Prognostic value of coronary blood flow velocity and myocardial perfusion in intermediate coronary narrowings and multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:852-8. (Pubitemid 34185334)
8. Chamuleau SA, van Eck-Smit BL, Meuwissen M, et al. Long-term prognostic value of CFVR and FFR versus perfusion scintigraphy in patients with multivessel disease. Neth Heart J 2007;15:369-74. (Pubitemid 350206877)
9. Meuwissen M, Chamuleau SAJ, Siebes M, et al. The prognostic value of combined intracoronary pressure and blood flow velocity measurements after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;71:291-7. (Pubitemid 351428143)
10. Meuwissen M, Siebes M, Chamuleau SA, et al. Hyperemic stenosis resistance index for evaluation of functional coronary lesion severity. Circulation 2002;106:441-6. (Pubitemid 34803688)
11. Verhoeff BJ, van de Hoef TP, Spaan JA, et al. Minimal effect of collateral flow on coronary microvascular resistance in the presence of intermediate and noncritical coronary stenoses. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2012;303:H422-8.
12. Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation 2001;103:2928-34. (Pubitemid 32578130)
13. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213-24.
14. van de Hoef TP, Meuwissen M, Escaned J, et al. Fractional flow reserve as a surrogate for inducible myocardial ischaemia. Nat Rev Cardiol 2013;10:439-52.
15. Muller O, Pyxaras SA, Trana C, et al. Pressure-diameter relationship in human coronary arteries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:791-6.
16. Kanatsuka H, Ashikawa K, Komaru T, et al. Diameter change and pressure-red blood cell velocity relations in coronary microvessels during long diastoles in the canine left ventricle. Circ Res 1990;66:503-10. (Pubitemid 20041181)
17. Hanley FL, Messina LM, Grattan MT, et al. The effect of coronary inflow pressure on coronary vascular resistance in the isolated dog heart. Circ Res 1984;54:760-72. (Pubitemid 14091681)
18. Verhoeff BJ, Siebes M, Meuwissen M, et al. Influence of percutaneous coronary intervention on coronary microvascular resistance index. Circulation 2005;111:76-82. (Pubitemid 40070847)
19. Di Mario C, Serruys PW. Principles of interpretation of coronary velocity and pressure tracings. Eur Heart J 1995;16(Suppl J):53-9.
20. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367:991-1001.
21. Chareonthaitawee P, Kaufmann PA, Rimoldi O, et al. Heterogeneity of resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow in healthy humans. Cardiovasc Res 2001;50:151-61. (Pubitemid 32244395)
22. Siebes M, Verhoeff BJ, Meuwissen M, et al. Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions. Circulation 2004;109:756-62. (Pubitemid 38222896)
23. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, et al. Value of stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with normal resting electrocardiograms: An evaluation of incremental prognostic value and cost-effectiveness. Circulation 2002;105:823-9. (Pubitemid 34174922)
24. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, et al. Incremental prognostic value of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and impact on subsequent management in patients with or suspected of having myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:426-33. (Pubitemid 27371746)
25. Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk Assessment Using Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Technetium-99 m Sestamibi Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:57-62. (Pubitemid 28351042)
26. Fearon WF, Aarnoudse W, Pijls NH, et al. Microvascular resistance is not influenced by epicardial coronary artery stenosis severity: experimental validation. Circulation 2004;109:2269-72. (Pubitemid 38656865)
27. Spaan JA, Piek JJ, Hoffman JI, et al. Physiological basis of clinically used coronary hemodynamic indices. Circulation 2006;113:446-55. (Pubitemid 43803207)
28. Li J, Elrashidi MY, Flammer AJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice. Eur Heart J 2013;34:1375-83.
29. Bech GJW, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis : A randomized trial. Circulation 2001;103:2928-34. (Pubitemid 32578130)