Design considerations for an internet portal to support public participation in transportation improvement decision making

Collaborative Geographic Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 208-236

  Nyerges, Timothy L ^a   Ramsey, Kevin S ^a   Wilson, Matthew W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901573104     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-845-1.ch012     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Andersen, I.-E., & Jaeger, B. (1999). Danish participatory models: Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: Towards more democratic decision making. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 331-340.
2. Benhabib, S. (1996). Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Brahm, C., & Kleiner, B. H. (1996). Advantages and disadvantages of group decision-making approaches, Team Performance Management, 2, 30.
4. Couclelis, H., & Monmonier, M. S. (1995). Using suss to resolve nimby: How spatial understanding support systems can help with the "not in my back yard" syndrome. Geographical Systems, 2, 83-101.
5. Cunningham, F. (2002). Theories of democracy: A critical introduction. London; New York: Routledge.
6. Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
7. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
8. Dowling, K. L., & St Louis, R. D. (2000). Asynchronous implementation of the nominal group technique: Is it effective? Decision Support Systems, 29(3), 229-248.
9. Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. UK: Oxford University Press.
10. Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
11. Grudin, J., & Pruitt, J. (2002). Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In Proceedings of PDC (pp. 144-161).
12. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). What deliberative democracy means. In Why deliberative democracy? (pp. 1-63). NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review, 63(2), 143-162.
14. Innes, J. E. (1998). Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 52-63.
15. Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. L. (2001a). Geochoiceperspectives: A collaborative spatial decision support system. In D. L. Schmoldt, J. Kangas, G. Mendoza, & M. Pesonen (Eds.), The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making (pp. 253-268). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. L. (2001b). Geographic information systems for group decision making: Towards a participatory, geographic information science. London: Taylor & Francis.
17. Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. L. (2001c). GIS-supported collaborative decision making: Results of an experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(1), 48-70.
18. Jankowski, P., Nyerges, T. L., Smith, A., Moore, T. J., & Horvath, E. (1997). Spatial group choice: A sdss tool for collaborative spatial decision making. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 11(6), 577-602.
19. Jefferson Center. (2004). Citizens jury. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from http://www.jeffersoncenter.org/citizens_jury.htm
20. Kirschner, P. A., Shum, J. B., & Carr, C. S. (Eds.). (2003). Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. New York: Springer.
21. Mycoted. (2003). Creativity techniques. Retrieved from http://www.mycoted.com/creativity/techniques/index.php
22. National Research Council. (1996). Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
23. NEPA. (1970). National environmental policy act of 1969. Pub. L. 91-190, 42 usc 43214347, January 1, 1970, as amended by Pub. L. 94-52, July 3, 1975.
24. Nyerges, T. L., & Jankowski, P. (1997). Enhanced adaptive structuration theory: A theory of GIS-supported collaborative decision making. Geographical Systems, 4(3), 225-259.
25. Nyerges, T. L., Jankowski, P., Ramsey, K., & Tuthill, D. (2003, July 21-22). PPGIS in collaborative water resource decision making: Results of a field experiment. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Public Participation in GIS Conference, Portland, OR.
26. Nyerges, T. L., Montejano, R., Oshiro, C., & Dadswell, M. (1997). Group-based geographic information systems for transportation improvement site selection. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 5C(6), 349-369.
27. Ramsey, K. S. (2004). Stakeholder involvement and complex decision making: A case study into the design and implementation of a GIS for supporting local water resource management. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.
28. Renn, O., Blattel-Mink, B., & Kastenholz, H. (1997). Discursive methods in environmental decision making. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6(4), 218-231.
29. Renn, O., Webler, T., & Wiedemann, P. (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse (Vol. 10). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Rinner, C. (2001). Argumentation maps: GIS-based discussion support for online planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 847-863.
31. Robischon, S., Jankowski, P., Nyerges, T. L., & Tuthill, D. (2003, July 21-22). Design considerations for participatory GIS. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Public Participation in GIS Conference, Portland, OR.
32. Roth, P. L., Schleifer, L. L. F., & Switzer, F. S. (1995). Nominal group technique - An aid in implementing tqm. The CPA Journal, 65(5), 68 (62).
33. Sclove, R. E. (2000). Town meetings on technology: Consensus conferences as democratic participation. In D. L. Kleinman (Ed.), Science, technology, and democracy (pp. 33-48). New York: State University of New York Press.
34. Smith, S. (1999). Guidebook for transportation corridor studies: A process of effective decision-making. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, no. 435, Transportation Research Board.
35. Spencer, L. J. (1989). Winning through participation: Meeting the challenge of corporate change with the technology of participation. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
36. Taylor, N. (1998). Mistaken interests and the discourse model of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 64-75.
37. Turoff, M. S., & Hiltz, R. (1996). Computer-based delphi processes. In M. Adler & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Gazing in to the oracle: The delphi method and its application to social policy and public health (pp. 56-85). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
38. U.S. Department of Transportation. (1998). Transportation equity act for the 21st century (tea-21).
39. Wachs, M., & Schofer, J. L. (1969). Abstract values and concrete highways. Traffic Quarterly, 133-145.
40. Wilson, M. W. (2005). Implications for a public participation geographic information science: Analyzing trends in research and practice. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.
41. Wilson, M. W., Ramsey, K., & Nyerges, T. L. (2005). Design considerations for supporting online, analytic-deliberative, public participation. 2nd Conference on Online Deliberation: Design, Research and Practice/DIAC-2005. Stanford University, CA.
42. Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 120-135). NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Young, I. M. (1997). Difference as a resource for democratic communication. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 383-406). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.