Enhancing mathematical discourse: The effects of e-mail conversation on learning graphing;Améliorer le discours mathématique: Effets des conversations électroniques sur l’apprentissage des graphes;Verbesserung des mathematischen Diskurses: Auswirkungen von Email Kommunikation auf das Erlernen von graphischen Darstellungen

Educational Media International

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 101-106

  Kramarski, Bracha ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901551186     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523980210131169     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Deaudelin, C and Richer, A (1999) A learning conversation approach integrating Its experiment to support the student learning process at college level. Paper presented at the 8th EARLI Conference August 24-28, Göteborg, Sweden.
2. Burton, L and Morgan, C (2000) Mathematicians Writing, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 4, 429-453.
3. Harri-Augstein, ES and Thomas, LF (1991). Learning conversation. The self-learning way to personal and organizational growth, Routledge, New York.
4. Hiltz, S (1988) Collaborative learning in a virtual classroom: Highlights of findings. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Cooperative Work Conference (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED305895).
5. Kramarski, B and Mevarech, ZR (1997) Cognitive-metacognitive training within a problem solving based Logo environment, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 425-445.
6. Kramarski, B (1999) Is easier better? The study of graphs by computers, Educational Media International, 36, 3, 203-209.
7. Kramarski, B (2000) The effects of different instructional methods on the ability to communicate mathematical reasoning. In Nakahara, T and Koyama, M (eds) Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Hiroshima: Hiroshima University.
8. Kramarski, B and Zeichner, O (2001) Using technology to enhance mathematical reasoning: effects of feedback and self-regulation learning, Educational Media International, 38, 2/3, 77-82.
9. Kramarski, B, Mevarech, ZR and Liberman, A (2001) The Effects of multilevel - versus unilevel-metacognitive training on mathematical reasoning, Journal for Educational Research, 94, 5, 292-300.
10. Leinhardt, G, Zaslavsky, O and Stein, MK (1990) Functions, graphs, and graphing: tasks, learning, and teaching, Review of Educational Research, 60, 1-64.
11. Mabrio, M (1991) Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response. Conversation on high-and low-apprehensive, Written Communication, 8, 4, 509-535.
12. Mevarech, ZR and Kramarski, B (1997a) IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms, American Educational Research Journal, 34, 365-394.
13. Mevarech, ZR and Kramarski, B (1997b) From verbal descriptions to graphie representations: misconceptions regarding the construction of Linear graphs, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 229-263.
14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000) Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
15. Pimm, D (1987) Speaking Mathematically: Communication Mathematics Classroom, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
16. Poling, DJ (1994) E-MAIL as an effective teaching supplement, Educational Technology, 34, 5, 53-55.
17. Schoenfeld, AH (1985) Mathematical problem so hing, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
18. Williams, LH and Merideth, EM (1995). Internet outposts: communication patterns in computer-mediated classrooms, Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 638-642.