What is an authentic learning environment?

Authentic Learning Environments in Higher Education

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-13

  Herrington, Anthony ^a   Herrington, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901529936     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-594-8.ch001     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Alessi, S. (1988). Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15(2), 40-47.
2. Barab, S.A., Squire, K.D., & Dueber, W. (2000). A co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 37-62.
3. Berge, Z.L., Collins, M., & Dougherty, K. (2000). Design guidelines for webbased courses. In B. Abbey (Ed.), Instructional and cognitive impacts of web-based education (pp. 32-40). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
4. Bransford, J.D., Vye, N., Kinzer, C., & Risko, V. (1990). Teaching thinking and content knowledge: Toward an integrated approach. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 381-413). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
7. Choi, J., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53-69.
8. Clayden, E., Desforges, C., Mills, C., & Rawson, W. (1994). Authentic activity and learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 42(2), 163-173.
9. Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4-15.
10. Collen, A. (1996). Reflection and metaphor in conversation. Educational Technology, 36(1), 54-55.
11. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
12. Davydov, V.V. (1995). The influence of L.S. Vygotsky on education theory, research and practice. Educational Researcher, 24(3), 12-21.
13. Duchastel, P.C. (1997). A Web-based model for university instruction. Journal of educational technology systems, 25(3), 221-228.
14. Edelson, D.C., Pea, R.D., & Gomez, L. (1996). Constructivism in the collaboratory. In B.G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 151-164). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
15. Forman, E.A., & Cazden, C.B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskyan perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 323-347). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
16. Golding, B., & Vallence, K. (1999). The university - VET transition. RCVET Working Paper, UTS Research Centre for Vocational Education and Training, Sydney.
17. Greenfield, P.M. (1984). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 117-138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
18. Harley, S. (1993). Situated learning and classroom instruction. Educational Technology, 33(3), 46-51.
19. Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic assessment and multimedia: How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 17(3), 305-322.
20. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T.C. (2003). 'Cognitive realism' in online authentic learning environments. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), EdMedia World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 2115-2121). Norfolk, VA: AACE.
21. Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., Oliver, R., & Woo, Y. (2004). Designing authentic activities in web-based courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(1), 3-29.
22. Hill, J.R., & Hannafin, M.J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37-52.
23. Honebein, P.C., Duffy, T.M., & Fishman, B.J. (1993). Constructivism and the design of learning environments: Context and authentic activities for learning. In T.M. Duffy, J. Lowyck & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 87-108). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
24. Hooper, S. (1992). Cooperative learning and computer-based design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 21-38.
25. Jonassen, D. (1993). The trouble with learning environments. Educational Technology, 33(1), 35-37.
26. Katz, S., & Lesgold, A. (1993). The role of the tutor in computer-based collaborative learning situations. In S.P. Lajoie & S.J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 289-317). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Kemmis, S. (1985). Action research and the politics of reflection. In D. Boud, R. Keogh & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 139-163). London: Kogan Page.
28. Knights, S. (1985). Reflection and learning: The importance of a listener. In D. Boud, R. Keogh & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 85-90). London: Kogan Page.
29. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
30. Lebow, D., & Wager, W.W. (1994). Authentic activity as a model for appropriate learning activity: Implications for emerging instructional technologies. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 23(3), 231-144.
31. Lee, B. (1985). Intellectual origins of Vygotsky's semiotic analysis. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 66-93). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
32. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning. I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115-27.
33. McLellan, H. (Ed.). (1996). Situated learning perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
34. Perkins, D.N. (1991). What constructivism demands of the learner. Educational Technology, 31(8), 19-21.
35. Petraglia, J. (1998a). The real world on a short leash: The (mis)application of constructivism to the design of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 53-65.
36. Petraglia, J. (1998b). Reality by design: The rhetoric and technology of authenticity in education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Reeves, T.C., & Okey, J.R. (1996). Alternative assessment for constructivist learning environments. In B.G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 191-202). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
38. Reeves, T.C., & Reeves, P.M. (1997). Effective dimensions of interactive learning on the World Wide Web. In B.H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 59-66). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
39. Relan, A., & Gillani, B.B. (1997). Web-based instruction and the traditional classroom: Similarities and differences. In B.H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 41-46). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
40. Riesbeck, C.K. (1996). Case-based teaching and constructivism: Carpenters and tools. In B.G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 49-61). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
41. Savery, J.R., & Duffy, T.M. (1996). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B.G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135-148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
42. Smith, P.E. (1986). Instructional simulation: Research, theory and a case study (ED No. 267 793).
43. Smith, P.E. (1987). Simulating the classroom with media and computers. Simulation and Games, 18(3), 395-413.
44. Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., & Coulson, R.L. (1991a). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31(5), 24-33.
45. Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., & Coulson, R.L. (1991b). Knowledge representation, content specification, and the development of skill in situation-specific knowledge assembly: Some constructivist issues as they relate to cognitive flexibility theory and hypertext. Educational Technology, 31(9), 22-25.
46. Sternberg, R.J., Wagner, R.K., & Okagaki, L. (1993). Practical intelligence: The nature and role of tacit knowledge in work and at school. In J.M. Puckett & H.W. Reese (Eds.), Mechanisms of everyday cognition (pp. 205-227). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. von Wright, J. (1992). Reflections on reflection. Learning and Instruction, 2, 59-68.
48. Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation.