Games and simulations: A new approach in education?

Games and Simulations in Online Learning: Research and Development Frameworks

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-20

  Akilli, Göknur Kaplan ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901512012     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-304-3.ch001     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Akilli, G. K., & Cagiltay, K. (2006). An instructional design/development model for gamelike learning environments: The FIDGE model. In M. Pivec (Ed.), Affective and emotional aspects of human-computer interaction game-based and innovative learning approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 93-112). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
2. rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon Publication.
3. Amory, A., Naicker, K., Vincent, J., & Adams, C. (1999). The use of computer games as an educational tool: Identification of appropriate game types and game elements. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 311-321.
4. Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing technological change. Strategies for college and university leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. New York: Semiotext[e].
6. th National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Atlanta, GA (pp. 433-440). Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED 470175).
7. Calvert, S. L., & Jordan, A. B. (2001). Children in the digital age. Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(1), 3-5.
8. Cerny, M., & John, M. (2002, June). Game development. Myth vs. method. Game Developer Magazine, 32-36.
9. Clark, R. C. (2002). The new ISD: Applying cognitive strategies to instructional design. Performance Improvement Journal, 41(7), 8-14.
10. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.
11. Clark, R. E. (1994a). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(2), 21-29.
12. Clark, R. E. (1994b). Media and method. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(3), 7-10.
13. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 331-338.
14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
15. Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of constructivist learning environments: Immersion in distributed, virtual worlds. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 165-175). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
16. th ed., pp. 85-91). Guilford, CT: Dushkin/McGraw Hill.
17. Dempsey, J. V., Rasmussen, K., & Lucassen, B. (1996). The instructional gaming literature: Implications and 99 sources (Tech. Rep. No. 96-1). Mobile, AL: University of South Alabama, College of Education. Retrieved May 30, 2002, from http://www.coe.usouthal.edu/TechReports/TR96_1.PDF
18. Dick, W. (1987). A history of instructional design and its impact on educational psychology. In J. Glover & R. Ronning (Eds.), Historical foundations of educational psychology. New York: Plenum.
19. Funk, J. B., Hagan, J., & Schimming, J. (1999). Children and electronic games: A comparison of parents' and children's perceptions of children's habits and preferences in a United States Sample. Psychological Reports, 85(3), 883-888.
20. Glaser, R. (1971). The design of instruction. In M. D. Merrill (Ed.), Instructional design: Readings (pp. 18-37). Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Gordon, J., & Zemke, R. (2000). The attack on ISD. Training Magazine, 37(4), 42-53.
22. Gorriz, C. M., & Medina, C. (2000). Engaging girls with computers through software games. Communications of the ACM, 43(1), 42-49.
23. Gredler, M. E. (1994). Designing and evaluating games and simulations: A process approach. Houston, TX: Gulf Publication Company.
24. Gredler, M. E. (1996). Educational games and simulations: A technology in search of a (research) paradigm. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 521-539). New York: Macmillan.
25. Greenfield, P. M., deWinstanley, P., Kilpatrick, H., & Kaye, D. (1994). Action video games and informal education: Effects on strategies for dividing visual attention [Abstract]. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15(1), 105-123.
26. Gros, B., Elen, J., Kerres, M., Merriënboer, J., & Spector, M. (1997). Instructional design and the authoring of multimedia and hypermedia systems: Does a marriage make sense? Educational Technology, 37(1), 48-56.
27. rd ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources.
28. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (1998). Re-visioning models of instructional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 73-89.
29. th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
30. Hoffman, S. (1997). Elaboration theory and hypermedia: Is there a link? Educational Technology, 37(1), 57-64.
31. Jacobs, J. W., & Dempsey, J. V. (1993). Simulation and gaming: Fidelity, feedback and motivation. In J. V. Dempsey & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 197-228). Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
32. Jonassen, D. H. (1990). Thinking technology: Chaos in instructional design. Educational Technology, 30(2), 32-34.
33. Jonassen, D. H., Hennon, R. J., Ondrusek, A., Samouilova, M., Spaulding, K. L., Yueh, H. P., et al. (1997). Certainty, determinism, and predictability in theories of instructional design: Lessons from science. Educational Technology, 37(1), 27-33.
34. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (1997). Activity theory: Basic concepts and applications. Retrieved October 11, 2003, from http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/tutorial/bn.htm/
35. Kember, D., & Murphy, D. (1995). The impact of student learning research and the nature of design on ID fundamentals. In B. Seels (Ed.), Instructional design fundamentals: A reconsideration (pp. 99-112). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
36. Kirriemuir, J. (2002). Video gaming, education and digital learning technologies [Online]. D-lib Magazine, 8(2). Retrieved May 12, 2003, from http://www.dlib.dlib.org/february02/kirriemuir/02kirriemuir.html
37. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211.
38. Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(2), 7-19.
39. Malone, T. W. (1980). What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. Paper presented at the Joint Symposium: Association for Computing Machinery Special Interest Group on Small Computers and Special Interest Group on Personal Computers, Palo Alto, CA.
40. Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction, III: Cognitive and affective process analysis (pp. 223-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). (2003). Design principles of next-generation digital gaming for education. Educational Technology, 43(5), 17-22.
42. McCombs, B. L. (1986). The instructional systems development (ISD) model: A review of those factors critical to its successful implementation. Education Communication and Technology Journal, 34(2), 67-81.
43. Media Analysis Laboratory, Simon Fraser University, B.C. (1998). Video game culture: Leisure and play of B.C. teens [Online]. Retrieved June 11, 2003, from http://www.mediaawareness.ca/eng/ISSUES/VIOLENCE/RESOURCE/reports/vgames.html
44. Merrill, M. D., Li, Z., & Jones, M. K. (1990). Limitations of first generations instructional design. Educational Technology, 30(1), 7-11.
45. Molenda, M., & Sullivan, M. (2003). Issues and trends in instructional technology: Treading water. In.M. A.Fitzgerald, M. Orey, & R. M. Branch (Eds.), Educational Media and Technology Yearbook 2003 (pp. 3-20). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
46. Morrison, J. L., & Aldrich, C. (2003). Simulations and the learning revolution: An interview with Clark Aldrich. The Technology Source. Retrieved August 11, 2003, from http://64.124.14.173/default.asp?show=article&id=2032
47. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
48. Price, R. V. (1990). Computer-aided instruction: A guide for authors. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
49. Provenzo, E. F. (1992). The video generation. The American School Board Journal, 179(3), 29-32.
50. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. Reigeluth, C. M. (1996). A new paradigm of ISD? Educational Technology, 36(3), 13-20.
52. Reigeluth, C. M. (1997). Instructional theory, practitioner needs, and new directions: Some reflections. Educational Technology, 37(1), 42-47.
53. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. II): A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 5-29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. W. (1999). Formative research: Methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. II): A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 633-652). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Reigeluth, C., & Schwartz, E. (1989). An instructional theory for the design of computerbased simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16(1), 1-10.
56. Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(2), 57-67.
57. Richey, C. (1995). Trends in instructional design: Emerging theory-based models. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(3), 96-110.
58. Richey, R. C. (1997). Agenda-building and its implications for theory construction in instructional technology. Educational Technology, 37(1), 5-11.
59. Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 43-58.
60. Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., & Cumsille, P. (2003). Beyond Nintendo: Design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers & Education, 40(1), 71-94.
61. Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2), 65-86.
62. Rowland, G., Parra, M. L., & Basnet, K. (1994). Educating instructional designers: Different methods for different outcomes. Educational Technology, 34(6), 5-11.
63. Russell, T. (2003). The "No Significant Difference Phenomenon." Retreived December 10, 2005, from http://teleeducation.nb.ca/nosignificantdifference/
64. nd ed., pp. 131-144). Engelwood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
65. Schindelka, B. (2003). A framework of constructivist instructional design: Shiny, happy design. Inoad e-Zine, 3(1). Retrieved August 18, 2003, from http://www.inroad.net/shindelka0403.html
66. Seels, B., & Richie, R. (1994). Instructional technology: The definitions and domains of the field. Washington, DC: AECT.
67. nd ed.) (pp. 11-19). Engelwood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
68. Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R., & Gross, E. (2001). The impact of computer use on children's and adolescents' development. Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(1), 7-30.
69. Tessmer, M., Jonassen, D. H., & Caverly, D. (1989). Non-programmer's guide to designing instruction for microcomputers. Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
70. Tessmer, M., & Richey, R. C. (1997). The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 85-115.
71. Thurman, R. A. (1993). Instructional simulation from a cognitive psychology viewpoint. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(4), 75-79.
72. Tripp, S. D., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 31-44.
73. Turkle, S. (1984). Video games and computer holding power. In The second self: Computers and the human spirit (pp. 64-92). New York: Simon and Schuster.
74. Wilson, B. G. (1997). The postmodern paradigm. In C. R. Dills & A. A. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional development paradigms (pp. 63-80). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
75. Wilson, B. G., Teslow, J., & Osman-Jouchoux, R. (1995). The impact of constructivism (and post-modernism) on instructional design fundamentals. In B. B. Seels (Ed.), Instructional design fundamentals: A reconsideration (pp. 137-157). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
76. Winn, W. (1996). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 79-112). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.
77. Winn, W. (1997). Advantages of a theory-based curriculum in instructional technology. Educational Technology, 37(1), 34-41.
78. st century: Understanding the children in schools today. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 13(1), 175-192.
79. You, Y. (1993). What can we learn from Chaos theory? An alternative approach to instructional systems design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 17-32.
80. Zemke, R. E., & Rossett, A. (2002). A hard look at ISD. Training, 39(2), 26-34.