Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and the impact on breast reconstruction

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 72, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2014, Pages

  Pinell White, Ximena A ^a   Kolegraff, Keli ^a   Carlson, Grant W ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast reconstruction; Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy; Postoperative complications

Indexed keywords

BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84901508352     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: 15363708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000099     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, et al. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28: 3437-3441.
2. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, et al. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25: 5203-5209.
3. Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27: 1362-1367.
4. Arrington AK, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, et al. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16: 26 97-2704.
5. Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131: 320eY326e.
6. Chagpar AB, Studts JL, Scoggins CR, et al. Factors associated with surgical options for breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2006;106: 1462-1466.
7. King TA, Sakr R, Patil S, et al. Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29: 2158-2164.
8. Yi M, Hunt KK, Arun BK, et al. Factors affecting the decision of breast cancer patients to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010;3: 1026-1034.
9. Elmore L, Myckatyn TM, Gao F, et al. Reconstruction patterns in a single institution cohort of women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19: 3223-3229.
10. Chung A, Huynh K, Lawrence C, et al. Comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and unilateral total mastectomy in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19: 2600-2606.
11. Position Statement on Prophylactic Mastectomy. 2007. Society of Surgical Oncology, available at www.surgonc.org/practice-policy/practice-management/ consensus-statements/position-statement-on-prophylactic-mastectomy.
12. Sorbero ME, Dick AW, Beckjord EB, et al. Diagnostic breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16: 1597-1605.
13. Bedrosian I, Hu CY, Chang GJ. Population-based study of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and survival outcomes of breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 102: 401-409.
14. Boughey JC, Hoskin TL, Degnim AC, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is associated with a survival advantage in high-risk women with a personal history of breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17: 2702-2709.
15. Brewster AM, Bedrosian J, Parker PA, et al. Association between contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast cancer outcomes by hormone receptor status. Cancer. 2012;118: 5637-5643.
16. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131: 15-23.
17. Crosby MA, Garvey PB, Selber JC, et al. Reconstructive outcomes in patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128: 1025-1033.
18. Miller ME, Czechura T, Martz B, et al. Operative risks associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a single institution experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013.
19. Osman F, et al. Increased postoperative complications in bilateral mastectomy patients compared to unilateral mastectomy: an analysis of the NSQIP database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20: 3212-3217.
20. Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA. 2006;295: 387-388.
21. Christian CK, Niland J, Edge SB, et al. A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: a study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Ann Surg. 2006;243: 241-249.
22. Reuben BC, Manwaring J, Neumayer LA. Recent trends and predictors in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy in the United States. Am J Surg. 2009;198: 237-243.
23. Alderman AK, McMahon L Jr, Wilkins EG. The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111: 695-703, discussion 704-705.
24. Barnsley GP, Sigurdson L, Kirkland S. Barriers to breast reconstruction after mastectomy in Nova Scotia. Can J Surg. 2008;51: 447-452.
25. Kruper L, Xu X, Henderson K, et al. Disparities in reconstruction rates after mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): patterns of care and factors associated with the use of breast reconstruction for DCIS compared with invasive cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18: 3210-3219.
26. Morrow M, Scott SK, Menck HR, et al. Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192: 1-8.
27. Polednak AP. Type of breast reconstructive surgery among breast cancer patients: a population-based study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108: 1600-1603.
28. Tseng WH, Stevenson TR, Canter RJ, et al. Sacramento area breast cancer epidemiology study: use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction along the rural-to-urban continuum. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126: 1815-1824.