Grammatical structures for word-level sentiment detection

NAACL HLT 2012 - 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 667-676

  Sayeed, Asad B ^a   Boyd Graber, Jordan ^b   Rusk, Bryan ^b   Weinberg, Amy ^b  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

FINE GRAINED; GRAMMATICAL STRUCTURE; OPINION TARGETS; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SUFFIX TREE DATA STRUCTURES; SYNTACTIC INFORMATION; TESTING DATA; TRAINING AND TESTING; TRAINING DATA; WORD LEVEL;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84901506592     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Alm, C. O. (2011). Subjective natural language problems: Motivations, applications, characterizations, and implications. In ACL (Short Papers).
2. Bollen, J., Mao, H., and Zeng, X.-J. (2010). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. CoRR, abs/1010.3003.
3. Choi, Y., Breck, E., and Cardie, C. (2006). Joint extraction of entities and relations for opinion recognition. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
4. de Marneffe, M.-C. and Manning, C. D. (2008). The stanford typed dependencies representation. In CrossParser '08: Coling 2008: Proceedings of the workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross- Domain Parser Evaluation, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Finkel, J. R., Grenager, T., and Manning, C. (2005). Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '05, pages 363-370, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Hsueh, P.-Y., Melville, P., and Sindhwani, V. (2009). Data quality from crowdsourcing: a study of annotation selection criteria. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2009 Workshop on Active Learning for Natural Language Processing, HLT '09, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Jakob, N. and Gurevych, I. (2010). Extracting opinion targets in a single and cross-domain setting with conditional random fields. In EMNLP.
8. Kessler, J. S., Eckert, M., Clark, L., and Nicolov, N. (2010). The 2010 ICWSM JDPA sentment corpus for the automotive domain. In 4th Int'l AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media Data Workshop Challenge (ICWSM-DWC 2010).
9. Kim, S.-M. and Hovy, E. (2006). Extracting opinions, opinion holders, and topics expressed in online news media text. In SST '06: Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text, pages 1-8, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Kschischang, F. R., Frey, B. J., and andrea Loeliger, H. (1998). Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 47:498-519.
11. Kübler, S., McDonald, R., and Nivre, J. (2009). Dependency parsing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 2(1).
12. McCallum, A., Schultz, K., and Singh, S. (2009). Factorie: Probabilistic programming via imperatively defined factor graphs. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS).
13. Moilanen, K. and Pulman, S. (2007). Sentiment composition. In Proceedings of the Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing International Conference (RANLP-2007), Borovets, Bulgaria.
14. Nakagawa, T., Inui, K., and Kurohashi, S. (2010). Dependency tree-based sentiment classification using crfs with hidden variables. In HLT-NAACL.
15. Neal, R. M. (1993). Probabilistic inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Technical Report CRG-TR-93-1, University of Toronto.
16. Pang, B. and Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 2(1-2).
17. Qiu, G., Liu, B., Bu, J., and Chen, C. (2011). Opinion word expansion and target extraction through double propagation. Computational linguistics, 37(1):9-27.
18. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. Free Press.
19. Ruppenhofer, J., Somasundaran, S., and Wiebe, J. (2008). Finding the sources and targets of subjective expressions. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odjik, J., Piperidis, S., and Tapias, D., editors, Proceedings of the Sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08), Marrakech, Morocco. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
20. Sayeed, A. B., Nguyen, H. C., Meyer, T. J., and Weinberg, A. (2010). Expresses-an-opinion-about: using corpus statistics in an information extraction approach to opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING '10.
21. Sayeed, A. B., Rusk, B., Petrov, M., Nguyen, H. C., Meyer, T. J., and Weinberg, A. (2011). Crowdsourcing syntactic relatedness judgements for opinion mining in the study of information technology adoption. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2011 workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and the Humanities (LaTeCH). Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. Stoyanov, V. and Cardie, C. (2006). Partially supervised coreference resolution for opinion summarization through structured rule learning. In EMNLP '06: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 336-344, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Tsui, C.-J., Wang, P., Fleischmann, K., Oard, D., and Sayeed, A. (2009). Understanding IT innovations by computational analysis of discourse. In International conference on information systems.
24. Wick, M., Rohanimanesh, K., Culotta, A., and Mccallum, A. (2009). SampleRank: Learning preference from atomic gradients. In NIPS WS on Advances in Ranking.
25. Wilson, T. and Wiebe, J. (2005). Annotating attributions and private states. In CorpusAnno '05: Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotations II, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
26. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., and Hoffmann, P. (2005). Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In HLT/EMNLP.