Good correlation of goutallier rating of supraspinatus fatty changes on axial and reformatted parasagittal computed tomographic images

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 340-343

  Müller, Camillo Theo ^a   Buck, Florian M ^a   Mamisch Saupe, Nadja ^a   Gerber, Christian ^a  

^a ORTHOPEDIC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BALGRIST   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

axial plane; computed tomography; fatty infiltration; Goutallier rating; parasagittal plane; supraspinatus muscle

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION METHODS; GRADING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPAIR;

AXIAL PLANES; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FATTY INFILTRATION; GOUTALLIER RATING; PARASAGITTAL PLANE; PEARSON CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS; ROTATOR CUFF; SUPRASPINATI MUSCLE; TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGES;

MUSCLE;

ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GOUTALLIER RATING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROTATOR CUFF; SUPRASPINATUS MUSCLE;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT POSITIONING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROTATOR CUFF; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; SUPERFICIAL BACK MUSCLES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901485779     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: 15323145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000059     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:116-120.
2. Bjorkenheim JM. Structure and function of the rabbit's supraspinatus muscle after resection of its tendon. Acta Orthop Scand. 1989;60:461-463.
3. Codman EA. Rupture of the supraspinatus tendon. 1911. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;254:3-26.
4. Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, et al. Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8:599-605.
5. Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J. The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:505-515.
6. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, et al. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre-and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;304:78-83.
7. Hansen BB. The essential role of balance tests in propensity-matched observational studies: comments on "A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003" by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine. Stat Med. 2008;27:2050-2054; discussion 2066-2059.
8. Oh JH, Kim SH, Choi JA, et al. Reliability of the grading system for fatty degeneration of rotator cuff muscles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1558-1564.
9. Ostor AJ, Richards CA, Prevost AT, et al. Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44:800-805.
10. Bianchi S, Martinoli C, Abdelwahab IF. Ultrasound of tendon tears. Part 1: general considerations and upper extremity. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34:500-512.
11. Bianchi S, Poletti PA, Martinoli C, Abdelwahab IF. Ultrasound appearance of tendon tears. Part 2: lower extremity and myotendinous tears. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:63-77.
12. Harryman DT 2nd, Mack LA, Wang KY, et al. Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:982-989.
13. Thomazeau H, Rolland Y, Lucas C, et al. Atrophy of the supraspinatus belly. Assessment by MRI in 55 patients with rotator cuff pathology. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:264-268.
14. Ward SR, Hentzen ER, Smallwood LH, et al. Rotator cuff muscle architecture: implications for glenohumeral stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;448:157-163.
15. Bryant L, Shnier R, Bryant C, et al. A comparison of clinical estimation, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy in determining the size of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:219-224.
16. Fotiadou AN, Vlychou M, Papadopoulos P, et al. Ultrasonography of symptomatic rotator cuff tears compared with MR imaging and surgery. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68:174-179.
17. Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Takwoingi Y, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9: CD009020.
18. Rees JL. The pathogenesis and surgical treatment of tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:827-832.
19. de Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, et al. Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1701-1707.
20. Dinnes J, Loveman E, McIntyre L, et al. The effectiveness of diagnostic tests for the assessment of shoulder pain due to soft tissue disorders: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:iii, 1-166.
21. BR, JS. Essential Medical Statistics, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2003.
22. Thomazeau H, Boukobza E, Morcet N, et al. Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997:275-283.