Imaging hallmarks of cancer in living mice

Nature Reviews Cancer

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 406-418

  Ellenbroek, Saskia I J ^a   Van Rheenen, Jacco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITOR; ANTIMITOTIC AGENT; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; CHEMOATTRACTANT; CHEMOKINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; CYTOKINE; DASATINIB; DOCETAXEL; GALLIUM ARSENIDE; MYOSIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITOR; PROTEINASE; QUANTUM DOT; SUNITINIB; TAMOXIFEN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRASTUZUMAB;

ANGIOGENESIS; ANTINEOPLASTIC ACTIVITY; APOPTOSIS; BONE MARROW CELL; CANCER CELL; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER STEM CELL; CANCER THERAPY; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL DEATH; CELL GROWTH; CELL HOMING; CELL INTERACTION; CELL INVASION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; ENERGY METABOLISM; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMMUNE SYSTEM; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; INTRAVITAL MICROSCOPY; MELANOMA METASTASIS; METASTASIS; MICROSCOPY; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MOUSE; NATURAL KILLER CELL; NEOPLASM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TUMOR ASSOCIATED LEUKOCYTE; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT; TUMOR XENOGRAFT;

ANIMALS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE PROGRESSION; MICE; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84901473312     PISSN: 1474175X     EISSN: 14741768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrc3742     Document Type: Review

References (149)

1. Progatzky, F., Dallman, M. J. & Lo Celso, C. From seeing to believing: labelling strategies for in vivo cell-tracking experiments. Interface Focus 3, 20130001 (2013).
2. Condeelis, J. & Weissleder, R. In vivo imaging in cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect Biol. 2, a003848 (2010).
3. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57-70 (2000).
4. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646-674 (2011).
5. Christofori, G. New signals from the invasive front. Nature 441, 444-450 (2006).
6. Rowe, R. G. & Weiss, S. J. Breaching the basement membrane: who, when and how? Trends Cell Biol. 18, 560-574 (2008).
7. Tanjore, H. & Kalluri, R. The role of type IV collagen and basement membranes in cancer progression and metastasis. Am. J. Pathol. 168, 715-717 (2006).
8. Condeelis, J. & Segall, J. E. Intravital imaging of cell movement in tumours. Nature Rev. Cancer 3, 921-930 (2003).
9. Pinner, S. & Sahai, E. Imaging amoeboid cancer cell motility in vivo. J. Microsc. 231, 441-445 (2008).
10. Tozluo?lu, M. et al. Matrix geometry determines optimal cancer cell migration strategy and modulates response to interventions. Nature Cell Biol. 15, 751-762 (2013).
11. Patsialou, A. et al. Intravital multiphoton imaging reveals multicellular streaming as a crucial component of in vivo cell migration in human breast tumors. Intravital 2, e25294 (2013).
12. Friedl, P., Locker, J., Sahai, E. & Segall, J. E. Classifying collective cancer cell invasion. Nature Cell Biol. 14, 777-783 (2012).
13. Roussos, E. T., Condeelis, J. S. & Patsialou, A. Chemotaxis in cancer. Nature Rev. Cancer 11, 573-587 (2011).
14. Gaggioli, C. et al. Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 1392-1400 (2007).
15. Giampieri, S. et al. Localized and reversible TGFβ signalling switches breast cancer cells from cohesive to single cell motility. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 1287-1296 (2009).
16. Wyckoff, J. et al. A paracrine loop between tumor cells and macrophages is required for tumor cell migration in mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 64, 7022-7029 (2004).
17. Wyckoff, J. B. et al. Direct visualization of macrophage-assisted tumor cell intravasation in mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 67, 2649-2656 (2007).
18. Boimel, P. J. et al. Contribution of CXCL12 secretion to invasion of breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 14, R23 (2012).
19. Patsialou, A. et al. Invasion of human breast cancer cells in vivo requires both paracrine and autocrine loops involving the colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor. Cancer Res. 69, 9498-9506 (2009).
20. Pinner, S. et al. Intravital imaging reveals transient changes in pigment production and Brn2 expression during metastatic melanoma dissemination. Cancer Res. 69, 7969-7977 (2009).
21. Wyckoff, J. B., Pinner, S. E., Gschmeissner, S., Condeelis, J. S. & Sahai, E. ROCK-and myosin-dependent matrix deformation enables protease-independent tumor-cell invasion in vivo. Curr. Biol. 16, 1515-1523 (2006).
22. Philippar, U. et al. A mena invasion isoform potentiates EGF-induced carcinoma cell invasion and metastasis. Dev. Cell 15, 813-828 (2008).
23. Roussos, E. T. et al. Mena invasive (MenaINV) promotes multicellular streaming motility and transendothelial migration in a mouse model of breast cancer. J. Cell Sci. 124, 2120-2131 (2011).
24. Canel, M. et al. Quantitative in vivo imaging of the effects of inhibiting integrin signaling via Src and FAK on cancer cell movement: effects on E-cadherin dynamics. Cancer Res. 70, 9413-9422 (2010).
25. Serrels, A. et al. Real-time study of E-cadherin and membrane dynamics in living animals: implications for disease modeling and drug development. Cancer Res. 69, 2714-2719 (2009).
26. McGhee, E. J. et al. FLIM-FRET imaging in vivo reveals 3D-environment spatially regulates RhoGTPase activity during cancer cell invasion. Small GTPases 2, 239-244 (2011).
27. Timpson, P. et al. Spatial regulation of RhoA activity during pancreatic cancer cell invasion driven by mutant p53. Cancer Res. 71, 747-757 (2011).
28. Gurskaya, N. G. et al. Engineering of a monomeric green-to-red photoactivatable fluorescent protein induced by blue light. Nature Biotech. 24, 461-465 (2006).
29. Subach, O. M. et al. A photoswitchable orange-to-far-red fluorescent protein, PSmOrange. Nature Methods 8, 771-777 (2011).
30. Ando, R., Hama, H., Yamamoto-Hino, M., Mizuno, H. & Miyawaki, A. An optical marker based on the UV-induced green-to-red photoconversion of a fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 99, 12651-12656 (2002).
31. Gligorijevic, B., Kedrin, D., Segall, J. E., Condeelis, J. & van Rheenen, J. Dendra2 photoswitching through the mammary imaging window. J. Vis. Exp. 5, 1278 (2009).
32. Kedrin, D. et al. Intravital imaging of metastatic behavior through a mammary imaging window. Nature Methods 5, 1019-1021 (2008).
33. Gligorijevic, B. et al. N-WASP-mediated invadopodium formation is involved in intravasation and lung metastasis of mammary tumors. J. Cell Sci. 125, 724-734 (2012).
34. Amornphimoltham, P. et al. Rab25 regulates invasion and metastasis in head and neck cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 1375-1388 (2013).
35. Ritsma, L. et al. Intravital microscopy through an abdominal imaging window reveals a pre-micrometastasis stage during liver metastasis. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 158ra145 (2012).
36. Sipkins, D. A. et al. In vivo imaging of specialized bone marrow endothelial microdomains for tumour engraftment. Nature 435, 969-973 (2005).
37. Kienast, Y. et al. Real-time imaging reveals the single steps of brain metastasis formation. Nature Med. 16, 116-122 (2010).
38. Lecoq, J. et al. Simultaneous two-photon imaging of oxygen and blood flow in deep cerebral vessels. Nature Med. 17, 893-898 (2011).
39. Helmlinger, G., Yuan, F., Dellian, M. & Jain, R. K. Interstitial pH and pO2 gradients in solid tumors in vivo: high-resolution measurements reveal a lack of correlation. Nature Med. 3, 177-182 (1997).
40. Kodack, D. P. et al. Combined targeting of HER2 and VEGFR2 for effective treatment of HER2-amplified breast cancer brain metastases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E3119-3127 (2012).
41. Manning, C. S. et al. Intravital imaging reveals conversion between distinct tumor vascular morphologies and localized vascular response to Sunitinib. Intravital 2, e24790 (2013).
42. Motoike, T. et al. Universal GFP reporter for the study of vascular development. Genesis 28, 75-81 (2000).
43. Fang, M., Peng, C. W., Pang, D. W. & Li, Y. Quantum dots for cancer research: current status, remaining issues, and future perspectives. Cancer Biol. Med. 9, 151-163 (2012).
44. Kamoun, W. S. et al. Simultaneous measurement of RBC velocity, flux, hematocrit and shear rate in vascular networks. Nature Meth. 7, 655-660 (2010).
45. Nakasone, E. S. et al. Imaging tumor-stroma interactions during chemotherapy reveals contributions of the microenvironment to resistance. Cancer Cell 21, 488-503 (2012).
46. Fukumura, D., Duda, D. G., Munn, L. L. & Jain, R. K. Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: novel insights through intravital imaging in pre-clinical models. Microcirculation 17, 206-225 (2010).
47. Baluk, P., Morikawa, S., Haskell, A., Mancuso, M. & McDonald, D. M. Abnormalities of basement membrane on blood vessels and endothelial sprouts in tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 163, 1801-1815 (2003).
48. Chang, Y. S. et al. Mosaic blood vessels in tumors: Frequency of cancer cells in contact with flowing blood. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14608-14613 (2000).
49. Jain, R. K. Molecular regulation of vessel maturation. Nature Med. 9, 685-693 (2003).
50. Kessenbrock, K., Plaks, V. & Werb, Z. Matrix metalloproteinases: regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell 141, 52-67 (2010).
51. Minchinton, A. I. & Tannock, I. F. Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nature Rev. Cancer 6, 583-592 (2006).
52. Sounni, N. E. et al. Stromal regulation of vessel stability by MMP14 and TGFβ. Dis. Model. Mech. 3, 317-332 (2010).
53. Bockhorn, M., Jain, R. K. & Munn, L. L. Active versus passive mechanisms in metastasis: do cancer cells crawl into vessels, or are they pushed? Lancet Oncol. 8, 444-448 (2007).
54. de Visser, K. E., Eichten, A. & Coussens, L. M. Paradoxical roles of the immune system during cancer development. Nature Rev. Cancer 6, 24-37 (2006).
55. Joyce, J. A. & Pollard, J. W. Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis. Nature Rev. Cancer 9, 239-252 (2009).
56. Egeblad, M. et al. Visualizing stromal cell dynamics in different tumor microenvironments by spinning disk confocal microscopy. Dis. Model. Mech. 1, 155-167 (2008).
57. Lohela, M. & Werb, Z. Intravital imaging of stromal cell dynamics in tumors. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 20, 72-78 (2010).
58. Boissonnas, A., Fetler, L., Zeelenberg, I. S., Hugues, S. & Amigorena, S. In vivo imaging of cytotoxic T cell infiltration and elimination of a solid tumor. J. Exp. Med. 204, 345-356 (2007).
59. Breart, B., Lemaitre, F., Celli, S. & Bousso, P. Two-photon imaging of intratumoral CD8+ T cell cytotoxic activity during adoptive T cell therapy in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 1390-1397 (2008).
60. Mempel, T. R. et al. Regulatory T cells reversibly suppress cytotoxic T cell function independent of effector differentiation. Immunity 25, 129-141 (2006).
61. Deguine, J., Breart, B., Lemaître, F., Di Santo, J. P. & Bousso, P. Intravital imaging reveals distinct dynamics for natural killer and CD8+ T cells during tumor regression. Immunity 33, 632-644 (2010).
62. Ritsma, L., Vrisekoop, N. & van Rheenen, J. In vivo imaging and histochemistry are combined in the cryosection labelling and intravital microscopy technique. Nature Commun. 4, 2366 (2013).
63. DeNardo, D. G. et al. CD4+ T cells regulate pulmonary metastasis of mammary carcinomas by enhancing protumor properties of macrophages. Cancer Cell 16, 91-102 (2009).
64. Jacquelin, S. et al. CX3CR1 reduces Ly6Chigh-monocyte motility within and release from the bone marrow after chemotherapy in mice. Blood 122, 674-683 (2013).
65. Boissonnas, A. et al. CD8+ tumor-infiltrating T cells are trapped in the tumor-dendritic cell network. Neoplasia 15, 85-94 (2013).
66. Engelhardt, John, J. et al. Marginating dendritic cells of the tumor microenvironment cross-present tumor antigens and stably engage tumor-specific T cells. Cancer Cell 21, 402-417 (2012).
67. Shenghui, H., Nakada, D. & Morrison, S. J. Mechanisms of stem cell self-renewal. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25, 377-406 (2009).
68. Reya, T., Morrison, S. J., Clarke, M. F. & Weissman, I. L. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 414, 105-111 (2001).
69. Mazo, I. B. et al. Hematopoietic progenitor cell rolling in bone marrow microvessels: parallel contributions by endothelial selectins and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. J. Exp. Med. 188, 465-474 (1998).
70. Lee, J. et al. Implantable microenvironments to attract hematopoietic stem/cancer cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19638-19643 (2012).
71. Lo Celso, C., Lin, C. P. & Scadden, D. T. In vivo imaging of transplanted hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in mouse calvarium bone marrow. Nature Protoc. 6, 1-14 (2011).
72. Lo Celso, C. et al. Live-animal tracking of individual haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in their niche. Nature 457, 92-96 (2009).
73. Lassailly, F., Foster, K., Lopez-Onieva, L., Currie, E. & Bonnet, D. Multimodal imaging reveals structural and functional heterogeneity in different bone marrow compartments: functional implications on hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 122, 1730-1740 (2013).
74. Rompolas, P. et al. Live imaging of stem cell and progeny behaviour in physiological hair-follicle regeneration. Nature 487, 496-499 (2012).
75. Rompolas, P., Mesa, K. R. & Greco, V. Spatial organization within a niche as a determinant of stem-cell fate. Nature 502, 513-518 (2013).
76. Ritsma, L. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis revealed at single-stem-cell level by in vivo live imaging. Nature 507, 362-365 (2014).
77. Snippert, H. J. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134-144 (2010).
78. Driessens, G., Beck, B., Caauwe, A., Simons, B. D. & Blanpain, C. Defining the mode of tumour growth by clonal analysis. Nature 488, 527-530 (2012).
79. Chen, J. et al. A restricted cell population propagates glioblastoma growth after chemotherapy. Nature 488, 522-526 (2012).
80. Schepers, A. G. et al. Lineage tracing reveals Lgr5+ stem cell activity in mouse intestinal adenomas. Science 337, 730-735 (2012).
81. Zomer, A. et al. Intravital imaging of cancer stem cell plasticity in mammary tumors. Stem Cells 31, 602-606 (2012).
82. Livet, J. et al. Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature 450, 56-62 (2007).
83. Cai, D., Cohen, K. B., Luo, T., Lichtman, J. W. & Sanes, J. R. Improved tools for the Brainbow toolbox. Nature Meth. 10, 540-547 (2013).
84. Warburg, O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123, 309-314 (1956).
85. Cairns, R. A., Harris, I. S. & Mak, T. W. Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nature Rev. Cancer 11, 85-95 (2011).
86. Schulze, A. & Harris, A. L. How cancer metabolism is tuned for proliferation and vulnerable to disruption. Nature 491, 364-373 (2012).
87. Skala, M. C. et al. In vivo multiphoton fluorescence lifetime imaging of protein-bound and free nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide in normal and precancerous epithelia. J. Biomed. Opt. 12, 024014 (2007).
88. Walsh, A. J. et al. Optical metabolic imaging identifies glycolytic levels, subtypes, and early-treatment response in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 73, 6164-6174 (2013).
89. Zipfel, W. R. et al. Live tissue intrinsic emission microscopy using multiphoton-excited native fluorescence and second harmonic generation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7075-7080 (2003).
90. Monici, M. Cell and tissue autofluorescence research and diagnostic applications. Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 11, 227-256 (2005).
91. Conklin, M. W., Provenzano, P. P., Eliceiri, K. W., Sullivan, R. & Keely, P. J. Fluorescence lifetime imaging of endogenous fluorophores in histopathology sections reveals differences between normal and tumor epithelium in carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 53, 145-157 (2009).
92. Galletly, N. P. et al. Fluorescence lifetime imaging distinguishes basal cell carcinoma from surrounding uninvolved skin. Br. J. Dermatol. 159, 152-161 (2008).
93. Provenzano, P. P. et al. Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion. BMC Med. 4, 38 (2006).
94. Marzo, I. & Naval, J. Antimitotic drugs in cancer chemotherapy: promises and pitfalls. Biochem. Pharmacol. 86, 703-710 (2013).
95. Orth, J. D. et al. Analysis of mitosis and antimitotic drug responses in tumors by in vivo microscopy and single-cell pharmacodynamics. Cancer Res. 71, 4608-4616 (2011).
96. Janssen, A., Beerling, E., Medema, R. & van Rheenen, J. Intravital FRET imaging of tumor cell viability and mitosis during chemotherapy. PLoS ONE 8, e64029 (2013).
97. Andresen, V. et al. Infrared multiphoton microscopy: subcellular-resolved deep tissue imaging. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20, 54-62 (2009).
98. Rueckel, M., Mack-Bucher, J. A. & Denk, W. Adaptive wavefront correction in two-photon microscopy using coherence-gated wavefront sensing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17137-17142 (2006).
99. Vinegoni, C., Lee, S., Gorbatov, R. & Weissleder, R. Motion compensation using a suctioning stabilizer for intravital microscopy. Intravital 1, 115-121 (2012).
100. Soulet, D., Pare, A., Coste, J. & Lacroix, S. Automated filtering of intrinsic movement artifacts during two-photon intravital microscopy. PLoS ONE 8, e53942 (2013).
101. Fatakdawala, H. et al. Multimodal in vivo imaging of oral cancer using fluorescence lifetime, photoacoustic and ultrasound techniques. Biomed. Opt. Express 4, 1724-1741 (2013).
102. Kilarski, W. W. et al. Intravital immunofluorescence for visualizing the microcirculatory and immune microenvironments in the mouse ear dermis. PLoS ONE 8, e57135 (2013).
103. Wu, Y. I. et al. A genetically encoded photoactivatable Rac controls the motility of living cells. Nature 461, 104-108 (2009).
104. Sinha, D. K. et al. Photocontrol of protein activity in cultured cells and zebrafish with one-and two-photon illumination. Chembiochem 11, 653-663 (2010).
105. Lu, X. et al. Optochemogenetics (OCG) allows more precise control of genetic engineering in mice with CreER regulators. Bioconjug. Chem. 23, 1945-1951 (2012).
106. Sando Iii, R. et al. Inducible control of gene expression with destabilized Cre. Nature Meth. 10, 1085-1088 (2013).
107. Keese, M., Yagublu, V., Schwenke, K., Post, S. & Bastiaens, P. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis resistance in a syngenic mouse tumor model. Int. J. Cancer 126, 104-113 (2010).
108. Nobis, M. et al. Intravital FLIM-FRET imaging reveals dasatinib-induced spatial control of Src in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 73, 4674-4686 (2013).
109. Grant, D. M. et al. Multiplexed FRET to image multiple signaling events in live cells. Biophys. J. 95, L69-L71 (2008).
110. Yamaguchi, Y. et al. Live imaging of apoptosis in a novel transgenic mouse highlights its role in neural tube closure. J. Cell Biol. 195, 1047-1060 (2011).
111. Kamioka, Y. et al. Live imaging of protein kinase activities in transgenic mice expressing FRET biosensors. Cell Struct. Funct. 37, 65-73 (2012).
112. Johnsson, A.-Karin, E. et al. The Rac-FRET mouse reveals tight spatiotemporal control of Rac activity in primary cells and tissues. Cell Rep. 6, 1153-1164 (2014).
113. Huijbers, I. J., Krimpenfort, P., Berns, A. & Jonkers, J. Rapid validation of cancer genes in chimeras derived from established genetically engineered mouse models. Bioessays 33, 701-710 (2011).
114. Politi, K. & Pao, W. How genetically engineered mouse tumor models provide insights into human cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 2273-2281 (2011).
115. Cheon, D. J. & Orsulic, S. Mouse models of cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 6, 95-119 (2011).
116. Stoletov, K. et al. Role of connexins in metastatic breast cancer and melanoma brain colonization. J. Cell Sci. 126, 904-913 (2013).
117. Vogelstein, B. & Kinzler, K. W. Cancer genes and the pathways they control. Nature Med. 10, 789-799 (2004).
118. Greenman, C. et al. Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes. Nature 446, 153-158 (2007).
119. Pierce, A. J., Johnson, R. D., Thompson, L. H. & Jasin, M. XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 13, 2633-2638 (1999).
120. Certo, M. T. et al. Tracking genome engineering outcome at individual DNA breakpoints. Nature Methods 8, 671-676 (2011).
121. Giedt, R. J., Koch, P. D. & Weissleder, R. Single cell analysis of drug distribution by intravital imaging. PLoS ONE 8, e60988 (2013).
122. Earley, S. et al. In vivo imaging of drug-induced mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization at single-cell resolution. Cancer Res. 72, 2949-2956 (2012).
123. Thurber, G. M. et al. Single-cell and subcellular pharmacokinetic imaging allows insight into drug action in vivo. Nature Commun. 4, 1504 (2013).
124. Dennis, M. S. et al. Imaging tumors with an albumin-binding Fab, a novel tumor-targeting agent. Cancer Res. 67, 254-261 (2007).
125. Looney, M. R. et al. Stabilized imaging of immune surveillance in the mouse lung. Nature Meth. 8, 91-96 (2011).
126. Ritsma, L. et al. Surgical implantation of an abdominal imaging window for intravital microscopy. Nature Protoc. 8, 583-594 (2013).
127. Hsiung, P. L. et al. Detection of colonic dysplasia in vivo using a targeted heptapeptide and confocal microendoscopy. Nature Med. 14, 454-458 (2008).
128. Thurber, G. M., Figueiredo, J. L. & Weissleder, R. Multicolor fluorescent intravital live microscopy (FILM) for surgical tumor resection in a mouse xenograft model. PLoS ONE 4, e8053 (2009).
129. Wang, T. D., Mandella, M. J., Contag, C. H. & Kino, G. S. Dual-axis confocal microscope for high-resolution in vivo imaging. Opt. Lett. 28, 414-416 (2003).
130. Dunn, K. W. & Young, P. A. Principles of multiphoton microscopy. Nephron Exp. Nephrol. 103, e33-e40 (2006).
131. Helmchen, F. & Denk, W. Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nature Meth. 2, 932-940 (2005).
132. Campagnola, P. J. et al. Three-dimensional high-resolution second-harmonic generation imaging of endogenous structural proteins in biological tissues. Biophys. J. 82, 493-508 (2002).
133. Friedl, P., Wolf, K., von Andrian, U. H. & Harms, G. Biological second and third harmonic generation microscopy. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 34, 1-4 (2007).
134. Vakoc, B. J., Fukumura, D., Jain, R. K. & Bouma, B. E. Cancer imaging by optical coherence tomography: preclinical progress and clinical potential. Nature Rev. Cancer 12, 363-368 (2012).
135. Vakoc, B. J. et al. Three-dimensional microscopy of the tumor microenvironment in vivo using optical frequency domain imaging. Nature Med. 15, 1219-1223 (2009).
136. Gao, L. et al. Differential diagnosis of lung carcinoma with coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering imaging. Arch. Pathol. Lab Med. 136, 1502-1510 (2012).
137. Entenberg, D. et al. Imaging tumor cell movement in vivo. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Chapter 19, Unit19 7 (2013).
138. Ewald, A. J., Werb, Z. & Egeblad, M. Monitoring of vital signs for long-term survival of mice under anesthesia. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011, pdb. prot5563 (2011).
139. Yang, M. et al. Dual-color fluorescence imaging distinguishes tumor cells from induced host angiogenic vessels and stromal cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14259-14262 (2003).
140. Yang, M. et al. Direct external imaging of nascent cancer, tumor progression, angiogenesis, and metastasis on internal organs in the fluorescent orthotopic model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3824-3829 (2002).
141. Tanaka, K. et al. In vivo time-course imaging of tumor angiogenesis in colorectal liver metastases in the same living mice using two-photon laser scanning microscopy. J. Oncol. 2012, 265487 (2012).
142. Cao, L., Kobayakawa, S., Yoshiki, A. & Abe, K. High resolution intravital imaging of subcellular structures of mouse abdominal organs using a microstage device. PLoS ONE 7, e33876 (2012).
143. Jung, J. C., Mehta, A. D., Aksay, E., Stepnoski, R. & Schnitzer, M. J. In vivo mammalian brain imaging using one-and two-photon fluorescence microendoscopy. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 3121-3133 (2004).
144. Levene, M. J., Dombeck, D. A., Kasischke, K. A., Molloy, R. P. & Webb, W. W. In vivo multiphoton microscopy of deep brain tissue. J. Neurophysiol. 91, 1908-1912 (2004).
145. Kim, J. K. et al. Fabrication and operation of GRIN probes for in vivo fluorescence cellular imaging of internal organs in small animals. Nature Protoc. 7, 1456-1469 (2012).
146. Wood, S. Jr. Pathogenesis of metastasis formation observed in vivo in the rabbit ear chamber. AMA Arch. Pathol. 66, 550-568 (1958).
147. Lehr, H., Leunig, M., Menger, M., Nolte, D. & Messmer, K. Dorsal skinfold chamber technique for intravital microscopy in nude mice. Am. J. Pathol. 143, 1055-1062 (1993).
148. Zhang, L. et al. Imaging glioma initiation in vivo through a polished and reinforced thin-skull cranial window. J. Vis. Exp. 20, 4201 (2012).
149. Gerritsen, H., Agronskaia, A., Bader, A. & Esposito, A. in FRET and FLIM Techniques (ed. Gadella, T. W. J.) 95-132 (Elsevier Science, 2009).