Energy substitution, technical change and rebound effects

Energies

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 2850-2873

  Sorrell, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Elasticities of substitution; Energy augmenting technical change; Rebound effects

Indexed keywords

COST FUNCTIONS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

EMPIRICAL LITERATURE; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS; ENERGY-ECONOMIC MODEL; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; INDUSTRIAL SECTOR; REBOUND EFFECT; TECHNICAL CHANGE;

ELASTICITY;

EID: 84901461085     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19961073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/en7052850     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Sorrell, S. The Rebound Effect: An Assessment of the Evidence for Economy-Wide Energy Savings from Improved Energy Efficiency; UK Energy Research Centre: London, UK, 2007.
2. Saunders, H.D. A view from the macro side: Rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom-Brookes. Energy Policy 2000, 28, 439-449.
3. Turner, K. Negative rebound and disinvestment effects in response to an improvement in energy efficiency in the UK economy. Energy Econ. 2009, 31, 648-666.
4. Grepperud, S.; Rasmussen, I. A general equilibrium assessment of rebound effects. Energy Econ. 2004, 26, 261-282.
5. Patterson, M.G. What is energy efficiency?: Concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy Policy 1996, 24, 377-390.
6. Hanley, N.; McGregor, P.G.; Swales, J.K.; Turner, K. Do increases in energy efficiency improve environmental quality and sustainability? Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 692-709.
7. Saunders, H.D. The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. Energy J. 1992, 13, 131-148.
8. Saunders, H.D. Does predicted rebound depend on distinguishing between energy and energy services? Energy Policy 2000, 28, 497-500.
9. Saunders, H.D. Fuel conserving (and using) production function. Energy Econ. 2008, 30, 2184-2235.
10. Saunders, H.D. Recent evidence for large rebound: Elucidating the drivers and their implications for climate change models. Energy J. 2013, in press.
11. Saunders, H.D. Historical evidence for energy efficiency rebound in 30 US sectors and a toolkit for rebound analysts. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80, 1317-1330.
12. Berndt, E.R. Energy use, technical progress and productivity growth: A survey of economic issues. J. Product. Anal. 1990, 2, 67-83.
13. Sue Wing, I. Representing induced technological change in models for climate policy analysis. Energy Econ. 2006, 28, 539-562.
14. Berndt, E.R.; Wood, D.O. Energy price shocks and productivity growth in US and UK manufacturing. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 1986, 2, 1-31.
15. Binswanger, H.P. The measurement of technical change biases with many factors of production. Am. Econ. Rev. 1974, 64, 964-976.
16. Hogan, W.W.; Manne, A.S. Energy-the Economy Interactions: A Fable of the Elephant and the Rabbit; Energy and the Economy: Report 1 of the Energy Modelling Forum; Stanford University: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1970.
17. Hicks, J.R. The Theory of Wages; Macmillan: London, UK, 1932.
18. Broadstock, D.; Hunt, L.; Sorrell, S. UKERC Review of Evidence for the Rebound Effect:Technical Report 3-Elasticity of Substitution Studies; UK Energy Research Centre: London, UK, 2007.
19. Frondel, M. Empirical assessment of energy price policies: The case for cross price elasticities. Energy Policy 2004, 32, 989-1000.
20. Frondel, M. Modelling energy and non-energy substitution: A brief survey of elasticities. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 4601-4604.
21. Sato, K.; Koizumi, T. The production function and the theory of distributed shares. Am. Econ. Rev. 1973, 63, 484-489.
22. Christensen, L.R.; Jorgensen, D.W.; Lau, L.L. Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1973, 55, 28-45.
23. Berndt, E.R.; Wood, D.O. Technology, prices, and the derived demand for energy. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1975, 57, 259-268.
24. Koetse, M.J.; de Grooot, H.L.F.; Florax, R.J.G.M. Capital-energy substitution and shifts in factor demand: A meta-analysis. Energy Econ. 2008, 30, 2236-2251.
25. Apostolakis, B.E. Energy-Capital-substitutability/complementarity: The dichotomy. Energy Econ. 1990, 12, 48-58.
26. Frondel, M.; Schmidt, C.M. The capital-energy controverst: An artifact of cost shares. Energy J. 2002, 23, 53-75.
27. Raj, B.; Veall, M.R. The energy-capital complementarity debate: An example of a bootstrapped sensitivity analysis. Environmetrics 1998, 9, 81-92.
28. Berndt, E.R.; Christensen, L.R. The internal structure of functional relationships: Seperability, substitution and aggregation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1973, 40, 403-410.
29. Frondel, M.; Schmidt, C.M. Facing the truth about seperability: Nothing works without energy. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 51, 217-223.
30. Conrad, K. Computable General Equilibrium Models for Environmental Economics and Policy Analysis. In Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics; van dn Bergh, J.C.J.M., Ed.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 1999.
31. Bhattacharyya, S.C. Applied general equilibrium models for energy studies: A survey. Energy Econ. 1996, 18, 145-164.
32. Allan, G.; Hanley, N.; McGregor, P.G.; Kim Swales, J.; Turner, K. UKERC Review of Evidence for the Rebound Effect-Technical Report 4: Computable General Equilibrium Modelling Studies; Final Report to the Department Of Environment Food and Rural Affairs; UK Energy Research Centre: London, UK, 2006.
33. Glomsrod, S.; Wei, T.Y. Coal cleaning: A viable strategy for reduced carbon emissions and improved environment in China? Energy Policy 2005, 33, 525-542.
34. Blackorby, C.; Russell, R.R. The Morishima elasticity of substitution: Symmetry, constancy, separability and its relationship to the Hicks and Allen elasticities. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1981, 48, 147-158.
35. McFadden, D. Constant elasticity of substitution production functions. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1963, 30, 73-83.
36. Sato, K. A two level constant elasticity of substitution production function. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1967, 34, 201-218.
37. Kemfert, C. Estimated substitution elasticities of a nested CES production function approach for Germany. Energy Econ. 1998, 20, 249-264.
38. Van der Werf, E. Production functions for climate policy modelling: An empirical analysis. Energy Econ. 2008, 30, 2964-2979.
39. Lecca, P.; Swales, K.; Turner, K. An investigation of issues relating to where energy should enter the production function. Econ. Model. 2012, 28, 2832-2841.
40. Sanstad, A.H.; Roy, J.; Sathaye, S. Estimating energy-augmenting technological change in developing country industries. Energy Econ. 2006, 28, 720-729.
41. Bosetti, V.; Carraro, C.; Galeotti, M.; Massetti, E.; Tavoni, M. A world induced technical change hybrid model. Energy J. 2006, 27, 13-37.
42. Burniaux, J.M.; Martin, J.P.; Nicoletti, G.; Oliveira-Martins, J. GREEN a Multi-Sector, Multi-Region General Equilibrium Model for Quantifying the Costs of Curbing CO2 Emissions: A Technical Manual; OECD Economics Department Working Paper 116; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): Paris, France, 1992.
43. Edenhofer, O.; Bauer, N.; Kriegler, E. The impact of technological change on climate protection and welfare: Insights from the model MIND. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 54, 277-292.
44. Gerlagh, R.; van der Zwaan, B. Gross world product and consumption in a global warming model with endogenous technical change. Resour. Energy Econ. 2003, 25, 35-57.
45. Goulder, L.H.; Schneider, S.H. Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies. Resour. Energy Econ. 1999, 21, 211-253.
46. Kermfert, C. An integrated assessment model of economy energy-climate the model WIAGEM. Integr. Assess. 2002, 3, 281-298.
47. Manne, A.S.; Mendelson, R.; Richels, R.G. MERGE: A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy 1995, 23, 17-34.
48. Popp, D. ENTICE: Endogenous technical change in the DICE model of global warming. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2004, 48, 742-768.
49. Sue Wing, I. Induced Technical Change and the Cost of Climate Policy; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT): Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003.
50. Hertel, T.W.; Mount, T.D. The pricing of natural resources in a regional economy. Land Econ. 1985, 61, 229-243.
51. Hogan, W.W.; Jorgenson, D.W. Productivity trends and the cost of reducing CO2 emissions. Energy J. 1991, 12, 67-85.
52. Manne, A.S.; Richels, R.G. CO2 emissions limits: An economic cost analysis for the USA. Energy J. 1990, 11, 51-74.
53. Sue Wing, I.; Eckaus, R.S. The Implications of the Historical Decline in US Energy Intensity for Long-Run CO2 Emission Projections; Join Programme on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT): Cambridge, MA, USA, 2007.
54. Azar, C.; Dowlatabadi, H. A review of technical change in assessment of climate policy. Annu. Rev. Energy 1999, 24, 513-544.
55. Manne, A.; Richels, R. CO2 Emission Limits: An Economic Cost Analysis for the USA. In International Energy Economics; Sterner, T., Ed.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1992; pp. 323-345.
56. Manne, A.; Richels, R. Global CO2 emission reductions: The impacts of rising energy costs. Energy J. 1991, 12, 87-107.
57. Kemfert, C.; Welsch, H. Energy-capital-labour substitution and the economic effects of CO2 abatement: Evidence for Germany. J. Policy Model. 2000, 22, 641-660.
58. Van der Zwaan, B.C.C.; Gerlagh, R.; Klaassen, G.; Shrattenholzer, L. Endogenous technological change in climate change modelling. Energy Econ. 2002, 24, 1-19.
59. Löschel, A. Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: A survey. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 43, 105-126.
60. Stern, D.; Kander, A. The role of energy in the industrial revolution and modern economic growth. Energy J. 2012, 33, 125-152.