Mise en place: Setting the stage for thought and action

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 276-278

  Weisberg, Deena Skolnick ^a   Hirsh Pasek, Kathy ^b   Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick ^c   McCandliss, Bruce D ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; NOTE; PSYCHOLOGY; THINKING; CHILD; ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; SCHOOL; UNITED STATES;

BEHAVIOR; CHILD; ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL; SCHOOLS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84901440827     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.012     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Deeney J. A Philadelphia school's big bet on nonviolence. The Atlantic 2013, July 18. http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/07/a-philadelphia-schools-big-bet-on-nonviolence/277893/.
2. Gibson E.J. Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1988, 39:1-42.
3. Kelling G.L., Wilson J.Q. Broken windows: the police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic 1982, 249:29-38.
4. Norman, D.A. and Shallice, T. (1986) Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behaviour, Centre for Human and Information Processing Technical Report No. 99, 1980. Reprinted in revised form in Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Theory and Research (Vol. 4) (Davidson, R. et al., eds), Plenum Press, pp. 1-18.
5. Lillard A.S., et al. The impact of pretend play on children's development: a review of the evidence. Psychol. Bull. 2013, 139:1-34.
6. Weisberg D.S., et al. Guided play: where curricular goals meet a playful pedagogy. Mind Brain Educ. 2013, 7:104-112.
7. Bonawitz E., et al. The double-edged sword of pedagogy: instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition 2011, 120:322-330.
8. Dias M.G., Harris P.L. The effect of make believe play on deductive reasoning. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 1988, 6:207-221.
9. Weisberg D.S., Sobel D.M. Young children discriminate improbable from impossible events in fiction. Cogn. Dev. 2012, 27:90-98.
10. Cohen G.L., et al. Recursive processes in self-affirmation: intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science 2009, 324:400-403.
11. Burgess G.C., Braver T.S. Neural mechanisms of interference control in working memory: effects of interference expectancy and fluid intelligence. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e12861.
12. Fan J., et al. Response anticipation and response conflict: an event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:2272-2282.
13. Knutson B., et al. Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI. Neuroreport 2001, 12:3683-3687.
14. Chatham C.H., et al. Pupillometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:5529-5533.
15. Jonkman L.M. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study. Brain Res. 2006, 1:181-193.