Improving species diversity and biomass estimates of tropical dry forests using airborne LiDAR

Remote Sensing

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 4741-4763

  Hernández Stefanoni, José Luis ^a   Dupuy, Juan Manuel ^a   Johnson, Kristofer D ^b   Birdsey, Richard ^b   Tun Dzul, Fernando ^a   Peduzzi, Alicia ^b   Caamal Sosa, Juan Pablo ^c   Sánchez Santos, Gonzalo ^c   López Merlín, David ^c  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA DE YUCATÁN   (Mexico)

^b Northern Research Station   (United States)

^c Proyecto México Noruega Comisión Nacional Forestal ^*  (Mexico)

Author keywords

Above ground biomass; Biodiversity; Habitat heterogeneity; LiDAR; Vegetation structure

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; CARBON; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; LINEAR REGRESSION; VEGETATION;

ABOVE GROUND BIOMASS; HABITAT HETEROGENEITIES; MANAGEMENT DECISIONS; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSIONS; PLANT SPECIES DIVERSITY; REMOTELY SENSED DATA; SMALL-FOOTPRINT LIDARS; VEGETATION STRUCTURE;

OPTICAL RADAR;

EID: 84901408152     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs6064741     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Thomson, A.; Calvin, K.; Chini, L.; Hurtt, G.; Edmonds, J.; Ben Bond-Lamberty, B.; Frolking, S.; Wise, M.A.; Janetos, A.C. Climate mitigation and the future of tropical landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 19633-19638.
2. Fearnside, P.M.; Laurance, W.F. Tropical deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14, 982-986.
3. Le Quéré, C.; Peters, G.P.; Andres R.J.; Andrew, R.M.; Boden, T.; Ciais, P.; Friedlingstein, P.; Houghton, R.A.; Marland, G.; Moriarty, R.; et al. Global carbon budget 2013. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 2013, 6, 689-760.
4. Fahrig, L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34, 487-515.
5. Gibbs, H.K.; Brown, S.; Niles, J.O.; Foley, J.A. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: Making REDD a reality. Environ. Res. Lett. 2007, 2, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023.
6. Gillespie, T.W.; Foody, G.M.; Rocchini, D.; Giorgi, A.P.; Saatchi, S. Measuring and modelling biodiversity from space. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2008, 32, 203-221.
7. St-Louis, V.; Pidgeon, A.M.; Clayton, M.K.; Locke, B.A.; Bash, D.; Radeloff, V.C. Satellite image texture and a vegetation index predict avian biodiversity in the Chihuahuan Desert of New Mexico. Ecography 2009, 32, 468-480.
8. Turner, W.; Spector, S.; Gardiner, N.; Fladeland, M.; Sterling, E.; Steiniger, M. Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18, 306-314.
9. Hernández-Stefanoni, J.L.; Gallardo-Cruz, J.A.; Meave, J.A.; Dupuy, J.M. Combining geostatistical models and remotely sensed data to improve tropical plant richness mapping. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11, 1046-1056.
10. Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A.; Castro-Esau, K.L.; Kurz, W.A.; Joyce, A. Monitoring carbon stocks in the tropics and the remote sensing operational limitations: From local to regional projects. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19, 480-494.
11. Nagendra, H.; Rocchini, D.; Ghate, R.; Sharma, B.; Pareeth, S. Assessing plant diversity in a dry tropical forest: Comparing the utility of Landsat and IKONOS satellite images. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 478-496.
12. Helmer, E.; Brandeis, T.; Lugo, A.; Kennaway, T. Factors influencing spatial pattern in tropical forest clearance and stand age: Implications for carbon storage and species diversity. J. Geophys. Res. 2008, 113, doi:10.1029/2007JG000568.
13. Næsset, E.; Okland, T. Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 79, 105-115.
14. Drake, J.B.; Knox, R.G.; Dubayah, R.O.; Clark, D.B.; Condit, R.; Blair, J.B.; Hofton, M. Above-ground biomass estimation in closed canopy Neotropical forests using LiDAR remote sensing: Factors affecting the generality of relationships. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2003, 12, 147-159.
15. Nelson, R.; Ranson, K.J.; Sun, G.; Kimes, D.S.; Kharuk, V.; Montesano, P. Estimating Siberian timber volume using MODIS and ICEsat/GLAS. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 691-701.
16. Simonson, W.D.; Allen, H.D.; Coomes, D.A. Use of an airborne lidar system to model plant species composition and diversity of mediterranean oak forests. Conserv. Biol. 2012, 26, 840-850.
17. Leutner, B.F.; Reineking, B.; Müller, J.; Bachmann, M.; Beierkuhnlein, C.; Dech, S.; Wegmann, M. Modelling forest α-diversity and floristic composition-On the added value of LiDAR plus hyperspectral remote sensing. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 2818-2845.
18. Lefsky, M.A.; Harding, D.J.; Keller, M.; Cohen, W.B.; Caraba-jal, C.C.; Espirito-Santo, F.D.; Hunter, M.O.; de Oliveira, R. Estimates of forest canopy height and above-ground biomass using ICESat. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32, doi:10.1029/2005GL023971.
19. Lefsky, M.A.; Cohen, W.B.; Spies, R.A. An evaluation of alternate remote sensing products for forest inventory, monitoring, and mapping of Douglas-fir forests in western Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 2001, 31, 78-87.
20. Chave, J.; Andalo, C.; Brown, S.; Cairns, M.A.; Chambers, J.Q.; Eamus, D.; Folster, H.; Fromard, F.; Higuchi, N.; Kira, T.; et al. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbonstocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 2005, 145, 87-99.
21. Asner, G.P.; Hughes, R.F.; Varga, T.A.; Knapp, D.E.; Kennedy-Bowdoin, T. Environmental and biotic controls over aboveground biomass throughout a tropical rain forest. Ecosystems 2009, 12, 261-278.
22. Goetz, S.; Steinberg, D.; Dubayah, R.; Blair, B. Laser remote sensing of canopy habitat heterogeneity as a predictor of bird species richness in an eastern temperate forest, USA. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 108, 254-263.
23. Muller, J.; Brandl, R. Assessing biodiversity by remote sensing in mountainous terrain: The potential of LiDAR to predict forest beetle assemblages. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46, 897-905.
24. Vierling, K.T.; Bassler, C.; Brandl, R.; Vierling, L.A.; Weib, I.; Muller, J. Spinning a laser web: Predicting spider distributions using LiDAR. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21, 577-588.
25. Whitmore, T.C. Canopy gaps and the mayor groups of forest trees. Ecology 1989, 70, 536-538.
26. Lebrija-Trejos, E.; Pérez-García, E.A.; Meave, J.A.; Bongers, F.; Poorter, L. Functional traits and environmental filtering drive community assembly in a species-rich tropical landscape. Ecology 2010, 91, 386-398.
27. Dupuy, J.M.; Hernández-Stefanoni, J.L.; Hernández-Juárez, R.A.; Tetetla-Rangel, E.; López-Martínez, J.O.; Leyequién-Abarca, E.; Tun-Dzul, F.J.; May-Pat, F. Patterns and correlates of tropical dry forest structure and composition in a highly replicated chronosequence in Yucatan, Mexico. Biotropica 2012, 44, 151-162.
28. Gillespie, T.W. Predicting woody-plant species richness in tropical dry forests: A case study from South Florida, USA. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15, 27-37.
29. Rocchini, D. Effects of spatial and spectral resolution in estimating ecosystem α-diversity by satellite imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 111, 423-34.
30. Hernández-Stefanoni, J.L.; Gallardo-Cruz, J.A.; Meave, J.A.; Rocchini, D.; Bello-Pineda, J.; López-Martínez, J.O. Modelling α and β-diversity in a tropical forest from remotely sensed and spatial data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2012, 19, 359-368.
31. Palmer, M.W.; Earls, P.G.; Hoagland, B.W.; White, P.S.; Wohlgemuth, T. Quantitative tools for perfecting species lists. Environmetrics 2002, 13, 121-137.
32. Chave, J.; Condit, R.; Aguilar, S.; Hernandez, A.; Lao, S.; Perez, R. Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2004, 359, 409-420.
33. Mascaro, J.; Detteo, M.; Asner, G.P.; Muller-Landau, H.C. Evaluating uncertainty in mapping forest carbon with airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 3770-3774.
34. Vincent, G.; Sabatier, D.; Blanc, L.; Chave, J.; Weissenbacher, E.; Pelissier, R.; Fonty, E.; Molino, J.-F.; Couteron, P. Accuracy of small footprint airborne LiDAR in its predictions of tropical moist forest stand structure. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 125, 23-33.
35. Read, L.; Lawrence, D. Recovery of biomass following shifting cultivation in dry tropical forests of the Yucatán. Ecol. Appl. 2003, 13, 85-97.
36. Eaton, J.M.; Lawrence, D. Loss of carbon sequestration potential after decades of shifting cultivation in the Southern Yucatán. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 258, 949-958.
37. Chazdon, R.L.; Letcher, S.G.; Breugel, M.V.; Martínez-Ramos, M.; Bongers, F.; Finegan, B. Rates of change in tree communities of secondary Neotropical forests following major disturbances. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2007, 362, 273-289.
38. Flores, J.; Espejel, I. Tipos de Vegetación de la Península de Yucatán; Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Dirección General de Extensión: Yucatán, México, 1994.
39. Cabrera-Cano, E.; Sousa-Sánchez, M.; Téllez-Valdés, O. Imágenes de la Flora Quintanarroense; Centro de Investigaciones de Quintana Roo: Mexico City, Mexico, 1982.
40. Manuales Para el Levantamiento de Datos en Campo del Inventario Nacional Forestal y de Suelos. Available online: http://www.cnf.gob.mx:8080/snif/portal/infys/temas/documentos-metodologicos (accessed on 13 May 2014).
41. Gotelli, N.J.; Colwell, R.K. Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4, 379-391.
42. Cairns, M.A.; Olmsted, I.; Granados, J.; Argaez, J. Composition and aboveground tree biomass of a dry semi-evergreen forest on Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 186, 125-132.
43. Urquiza-Haas, T.; Dolman, P.M.; Peres, C.A. Regional scale variation in forest structure and biomass in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico: Effects of forest disturbance. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 247, 80-90.
44. Hughes, R.F.; Kauffman, J.B.; Jaramillo-Luque, V.J. Biomass, carbon, and nutrient dynamics of secondary forests in a humid tropical region of México. Ecology 1999, 80, 1892-1907.
45. Chave, J.; Condit, R.S.; Lao, S.; Caspersen, J.; Foster, R.B.; Hubbell, S.P. Spatial and temporal variation of biomass in a tropical forest: Results from a large census plot in Panama. J. Ecol. 2003, 91, 240-252.
46. Frangi, J.L.; Lugo, A.E. Ecosystem dynamics of a sub-tropical floodplain forest. Ecol. Monogr. 1985, 55, 351-369.
47. CartoData. Available online: http://www.cartodata.com (accessed on 13 May 2014).
48. Software for LIDAR Data Analysis and Visualization. Available online: http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/rsac/fusion (accessed on 13 May 2014).
49. Zar, J.H. Biostatistical Analysis; Prenctice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1999.
50. Miller, D.M. Reducing transformation bias in curve fitting. Am. Stat. 1984, 38, 124-126.
51. Ji, L.; Gallo, K. An agreement coefficient for image comparison. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2006, 72, 823-833.
52. Borcard, D.; Legendre, P.; Avois-Jacquet, C.; Tuomisto, H. Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology 2004, 85, 1826-1832.
53. Hernández-Stefanoni, J.L.; Ponce-Hernández, R. Mapping the spatial distribution of plant diversity indices using multi-spectral satellite image classification and field measurements. Biodivers. Conserv. 2004, 13, 2599-2621.
54. Frazer, G.W.; Magnussen, S.; Wulder, M.A.; Niemann, K.O. Simulated impact of sample plot size and co-resgistration error on the accuracy and uncertainty of LiDAR-derived estimates of forest stand biomass. Remote Sens. Environ. 2001, 111, 636-649.
55. Levin, N.; Shmida, A.; Levanoni, O.; Tamari, H.; Kark, S. Predicting mountain plant richness and rarity from space using satellite-derived vegetation indices. Divers. Distrib. 2007, 13, 1-12.
56. Nagendra, H. Using remote sensing to assess biodiversity. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2001, 22, 2377-2400.
57. López-Martínez, J.O.; Hernández-Stefanoni, J.L.; Dupuy, J.M.; Meave, J.A. Partitioning the variation of woody plant β-diversity in a landscape of secondary tropical dry forests across spatial scales. J. Veg. Sci. 2013, 24, 33-45.
58. Oldeland, J.; Wesuls, D.; Rocchini, D.; Schmidt, M.; Jrgens, N. Does using species abundance data improve estimates of species diversity from remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity? Ecol. Indic. 2010, 10, 390-396.
59. Prendergast, J.R.; Quinn, R.M.; Lawton, J.H.; Eversham, B.C.; Gibbons, D.W. Rare species, the coincidennce of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 1993, 365, 335-337.
60. Rossi, E.; Kuitunen, M. Ranking of habitats for the assessment of ecological impact in land use planning. Biol. Conserv. 1996, 77, 227-234.
61. D'Oliveira, M.V.N.; Reutebuch, S.E.; McGaughey, R.J.; Andersen, H.E. Estimating forest biomass and identifying logging areas using airborne scanning LiDAR in Antimary State Forest, Acre State, Western Brazilian Amazon. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 124, 479-491.
62. Asner, G.P.; Mascaro, J.; Muller-Landau, H.C.; Vieilledent, G.; Vaudry, R.; Rasamoelina, M.; Hall, J.S.; van Breugel, M. A universal airborne LiDAR approach for tropical forest carbon mapping. Oecologia 2012, 168, 1147-1160.
63. McElhinny, C.; Gibbons, P.; Bracks, C.; Bauhus, J. Forest and wood stand structural complexity: Its definition and measurement. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 218, 1-24.
64. Nascimento, H.E.M.; Laurence, W.F. Biomass dynamics in Amazonian forest fragments. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14, 127-138.
65. D'Angelo, S.A.; Andrade, A.C.S.; Laurance, S.G.; Laurance, W.F.; Mesquita, R.C.G. Inferred causes of tree mortality in fragmented and intact Amazonian forest. J. Trop. Ecol. 2004, 20, 243-246.
66. Jones, M.M.; Tuomisto, H.; Borcard, D.; Legendre, P.; Clark, D.B.; Olivas, P.C. Explaining variation in tropical plant community composition: Influence of environmental and spatial data quality. Oecologia 2008, 155, 593-604.
67. Araújo, M.B.; Guisán, A. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33, 1677-1688.