What impact? Aframework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance

California Management Review

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 118-141

  Ebrahim, Alnoor ^a   Rangan, V Kasturi ^a  

^a HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Mission; Nonprofit; Performance measurement; Scale; Scope; Social enterprise

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901337517     PISSN: 00081256     EISSN: 21628564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.118     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. A. Ebrahim and E. Weisband, eds., Global Accountabilities: Participation, Pluralism, and Public Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007);
2. L. Jordan and P. Van Tuijl, eds., NGO Accountability: Politics, Principles and Innovations (London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan, 2006);
3. K. P. Kearns, Managing for Accountability: Preserving the Public Trust in Nonprofit Organizations (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1996).
4. P. Brest and H. Harvey, Money Well Spent: A Strategic Plan for Smart Philanthropy (New York, NY: Bloomberg Press, 2008);
5. L. R. Crutchfield and H. M. Grant, Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2008);
6. Monitor Institute, "Investing for Social and Environmental Impact: A Design for Catalyzing an Emerging Industry", Monitor Institute, 2009.
7. H. Hwang and W. W. Powell, "The Rationalization of Charity: The Influences of Professionalism in the Nonprofit Sector", Administrative Science Quarterly 54/2(June 2009):268-298;
8. M. Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
9. P. Brest, H. Harvey, and K. Low, "Calculated Impact", Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7/1 (Winter 2009) 50-56;
10. M. Marino, Leap of Reason: Managing to Outcomes in an Era of Scarcity (Washington, D. C.: Venture Philanthropy Partners, 2011);
11. T. J. Tierney and J. L. Fleishman, Give Smart: Philanthropy that Gets Results (New York, NY: Public Affairs, 2011).
12. C. Roche, Impact Assessment for Development Agencies: Learning to Value Change (Oxford: Oxfam GB, 1999), p. 21.
13. H. Jones, "The 'gold standard' is not a silver bullet for evaluation", London, Overseas Development Institute, 2009.
14. L. Bickman, "The Functions of Program Theory", in L. Bickman, ed., Using Program Theory in Evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1987);
15. P. J. Rogers, "Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions", Evaluation, 14/1(January 2008):29-48;
16. C. H. Weiss, Evaluation Research: Methods for Assessing Program Effectiveness (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972);
17. J. Wholey, Evaluation: Promise and Performance (Washington, D. C.: Urban Institute Press, 1979).
18. J. C. Sawhill and D. Williamson, "Mission Impossible? Measuring Success in Nonprofit Organizations", Nonprofit Management and Leadership 11/3(Spring 2001):371-386. (Pubitemid 33248157)
19. United Way of America, "Agency Experiences with Outcome Measurement: Survey Findings", Report 0196, Alexandria, VA, 2000.
20. P. D. Hall, "A Solution is a Product in Search of a Problem: A History of Foundations and Evaluation Research", 2005, .
21. P. Frumkin, Strategic Giving: The Art and Science of Philanthropy (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 2006).
22. M. Kramer, R. Graves, J. Hirschhorn, and L. Fiske, "From Insight to Action: New Directions in Foundation Evaluation", FSG Social Impact Advisors, 2007, p. 5.
23. "Interview-Paul Brest, Jed Emerson, Katherina Rosqueta, Brian Trelstad and Michael Weinstein", Alliance Magazine, April 1, 2009, ;
24. B. Trelstad, "Simple Measures for Social Enterprise", Innovations, 3/3 (2008);
25. M. M. Weinstein (with C. E. Lamy), "Measuring Success: How Robin Hood Estimates the Impact of Grants", New York, NY, Robin Hood Foundation, 2009.
26. B. Glasrud, "The Muddle of Outcome Measurement: Be Careful How You Measure Programs", Nonprofit World, 19/6(November/December 2001):35;
27. S. Torjman, "Are Outcomes the Best Outcome?" Ottawa, Caledon Institute of Social Policy, 1999.
28. G. Hernández and M. G. Visher, "Creating a Culture of Inquiry: Changing Methods- and Minds-on the Use of Evaluation in Nonprofit Organizations", San Francisco, CA, The James Irvine Foundation, 2001, p. 2.
29. "Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India: In Service for Sight", Harvard Business School Case Number 593098, 2009;
30. "Harlem Children's Zone: Driving Performance with Measurement and Evaluation", Harvard Business School Case Number 303109, 2004.
31. T. Vickers, "Driving Down the Cost of High-Quality Care: Lessons from the Aravind Eye Care System", interview with Dr. Srinivasan, Health International, 11(2011):23.
32. ActKnowledge, "Theory of Change", 2010, ;
33. Andrea A. Anderson, "Theory of Change as a Tool for Strategic Planning: A Report on Early Experiences", New York, NY, Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change, 2004, ;
34. Keystone Accountability for Social Change, "Developing a Theory of Change", London, 2008, .
35. Harlem Children's Zone, "2010-2011 Biennial Report", New York, 2011, accessed August 22, 2013, .
36. V. K. Rangan, "Lofty Missions, Down-to-Earth Plans", Harvard Business Review, 82/3(March 2004):112-119.
37. R. M. Kanter, "Even Bigger Change: A Framework for Getting Started at Changing the World", Harvard Business School Background Note 305099, 2005;
38. R. M. Kanter, "The Change Wheel: Elements of Systemic Change and How to Get Change Rolling", Harvard Business School Background Note 312-083, 2011;
39. P. Uvin, P. Jain, and L. D. Brown, "Think Large and Act Small: Toward a New Paradigm for NGO Scaling Up", Word Development, 28/8(August 2000):1409;
40. P. Uvin and D. Miller, "Paths to Scaling-up: Alternative Strategies for Local Nongovernmental Organizations", Human Organization, 55/3(Fall 1996):344.
41. World Microfinance Forum Geneva, "Is it fair to do business with the poor? Report on the debate between Muhammad Yunus and Michael Chu", Geneva, 2008.
42. P. Brest, "A Decade of Outcome-Oriented Philanthropy", Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10/2(Spring 2012):42-47; Frumkin, op. cit.
43. A. Ebrahim, NGOs and Organizational Change: Discourse, Reporting and Learning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003);
44. R. Eyben, "Uncovering the Politics of 'Evidence' and 'Results': A Framing Paper for Development Practitioners", April 2013, ;
45. T. Wallace, L. Bornstein, and J. Chapman, The Aid Chain: Coercion and Commitment in Development NGOs (Rugby, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications, 2006).
46. The measurement challenges facing these three organizations are elaborated in three cases developed by the authors: A. Ebrahim and V. K. Rangan, "The Millennium Challenge Corporation and Ghana", Harvard Business School Case Number 310-025, 2010;
47. A. Ebrahim and V. K. Rangan, "Acumen Fund: Measurement in Venture Philanthropy (A)", Harvard Business School Case Number 310-011, 2011;
48. A. Ebrahim and C. Ross, "The Robin Hood Foundation", Harvard Business School Case Number 310-031, 2010.
49. S. Earl, F. Carden, and T. Smutylo, Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development;
50. J. Kania and M. Kramer, "Collective Impact", Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9/1(Winter 2011):36-41.
51. V. K. Rangan, "African Comprehensive HIV/AIDS Partnerships (ACHAP): The Merck/Gates Initiative in Botswana", Harvard Business School Case Number 505-057, 2007.
52. P. Kim and J. Bradach, "Why More Nonprofits are Getting Bigger", Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10/2(Spring 2012):15-16.
53. R. S. Kaplan and A. S. Grossman, "The Emerging Capital Market for Nonprofits", Harvard Business Review, 88/10(October 2010):110-118.
54. D. Bonbright, D. Campbell, and L. Nguyen, "The 21st Century Potential of Constituency Voice: Opportunities for Reform in the United States Human Services Sector", Alliance for Children & Families, United Neighborhood Centers of America, and Keystone Accountability, 2009;
55. R. Davies and J. Dart, "The 'Most Significant Change' (MSC) Technique: A Guide to Its Use", (2005), ; Earl, Carden, and Smutylo, op. cit.;
56. S. Khagram, C. Thomas, C. Lucero, and S. Mathes, "Evidence for Development Effectiveness", Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1/3(2009):247-270;
57. F. Twersky, P. Buchanan, and V. Threlfall, "Listening to Those Who Matter Most, the Beneficiaries", Stanford Social Innovation Review, 11/2(Spring 2013):41-45;
58. M. Q. Patton, Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use (New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2011).