Therapeutic interaction with an older personality disordered patient

Psychodynamic Psychiatry

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 151-172

  Josephs, Lawrence ^a   Sanders, Avihay ^a   Gorman, Bernard S ^a  

^a ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; CASE REPORT; DEFENSE MECHANISM; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PERSONALITY TEST; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOTHERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; DEFENSE MECHANISMS; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; Q-SORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84901333036     PISSN: 21622590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/pdps.2014.42.2.151     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Barber, J. P., Muran, J. C., McCarthy, K. S., & Keefe, R. J. (2013). Research on psychodynamic therapies. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 443-494). New York: Wiley.
3. Bender, D. S., Dolan, R. T., Skodol, A. E., Sanislow, C. A., Dyck, I. R., McGlashan, T. H., et al. (2001). Treatment utilization by patients with personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(2), 295-302. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp. 158.2.295 (Pubitemid 32116528)
4. Castonguay, L. G., & Hill, C. E. (Eds.). (2012). Transformation in psychotherapy: Corrective experiences across cognitive behavioral, humanistic, and psychodynamic approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10 (7). Retrieved July 3, 2008 from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7a.pdf.
6. Eubanks-Carter, C., Gorman, B. S., & Muran, J. C. (2012). Quantitative naturalistic methods for detecting change points in psychotherapy research: An illustration with alliance ruptures. Psychotherapy Research, 22(6), 621-637. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.693772
7. Jones, E. (2000). Therapeutic interaction: A guide to psychoanalytic therapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
8. Jones, E. E., Ghannam, J., Nigg, J. T., & Dyer, J. F. (1993). A paradigm for single-case research: The time series study of a long-term psychotherapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 381-394. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.61.3.381 (Pubitemid 23179690)
9. Josephs, L., Anderson, E., Bernard, A., Fatzer, K., & Streich, J. (2004). Assessing progress in analysis interminable. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 52(4), 1185-1214. doi: 10.1177/00030651040520041301 (Pubitemid 40137630)
10. Josephs, L., & McCleod, B. (2014). A theory of mind-focused approach to anger management. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31, 68-83. doi: 10.1037/a0034175
11. Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe personality disorders. New York: Yale University Press.
12. Kernberg, O. F. (2003). The management of affect storms in the psychoanalytic psychotherapy of borderline patients. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51(2), 517-544.
13. Levy, K. N, Meehan, K. B., & Yeomans, F. E. (2012). An update and overview of the empirical evidence for transference-focused psychotherapy and other psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder. In R. A. Levy, J. S. Ablon, & H. Kächele (Eds.), Psychodynamic psychotherapy research: Evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence (pp. 139-167). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
14. Luborsky, L. (1976). Helping alliances in psychotherapy: The groundwork for a study of their relationship to its outcome. In J. Claghorn (Ed.), Successful psychotherapy (pp. 92-116). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
15. Luborsky, L. (1995). The first trial of the P technique in psychotherapy research-A still lively legacy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(1), 6-14.
16. Millon, T, Davis, R., & Millon, C. (1997). MCMI-III manual (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
17. Mintz, J., & Luborsky, L. (1970). P-technique factor analysis in psychotherapy research: An illustration of a method. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 7(1), 13-18. doi: 10.1037/h0086542
18. Molinari, V., Ames, A., & Essa, M. (1994). Prevalence of personality disorders in two geropsychiatric inpatient units. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 7, 209-215. (Pubitemid 24330510)
19. Perry, J. C. (1990). Defense Mechanism Rating Scales (DMRS; 5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Author.
20. Perry, J. C, & Hogeland, P. (1998). Convergent and discriminant validity of overall defensive functioning. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 186(9), 529-535. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199809000-00003. (Pubitemid 28420589)
21. Pole, N., Ablon, J. S., & O'Conner, L. E. (2008). Using psychodynamic, cognitive behavioral, and control mastery prototypes to predict change: A new look at an old paradigm for long-term single-case research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(2), 221-232. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.55.2. 221.
22. Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2003). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. New York: Guilford.
23. Velicer, W. F, & Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231-251.
24. Vinnars, B., Thormählen, B., Gallop, R., Norén, K., & Barber, J. P. (2009). Do personality problems improve during psychodynamic supportive-expressive psychotherapy? Secondary outcome results from a randomized controlled trial for psychiatric outpatients with personality disorders. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46, 362-375. doi: 1037/a0017002
25. Zivian, M. T., Larsen, W. L., Gekoski, W. L., Knox, V. J., & Hatchette, V. (1994). Psychotherapy for the elderly: Public opinion. Psychotherapy, 31, 492-502. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.31.3.492 (Pubitemid 24372095)
26. Zweig, R. A. (2008). Personality disorder in older adults: Assessment challenges and strategies. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 298-305. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.39.3.298