Concordance for prognostic models with competing risks

Biostatistics

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 526-539

  Wolbers, Marcel ^a   Blanche, Paul ^b   Koller, Michael T ^c   Witteman, Jacqueline C M ^d   Gerds, Thomas A ^e  

^a OXFORD UNIVERSITY CLINICAL RESEARCH UNIT   (Viet Nam)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

C index; Competing risks; Concordance probability; Coronary heart disease; Prognostic models; Time dependent AUC

Indexed keywords

CORONARY DISEASE; HUMAN; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CORONARY DISEASE; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84901303591     PISSN: 14654644     EISSN: 14684357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxt059     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BENDER, R.,AUGUSTIN, T. AND BLETTNER, M. (2005). Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models. Statistics in Medicine 24, 1713-1723.
2. BEYERSMANN, J., DETTENKOFER, M., BERTZ, H. AND SCHUMACHER, M. (2007). A competing risks analysis of bloodstream infection after stem-cell transplantation using subdistribution hazards and cause-specific hazards. Statistics in Medicine 26, 5360-5369.
3. BICKEL, P. J., KLAASSEN, C. A., RITOV, Y. AND WELLNER, J. A. (1993). Efficient and Adaptive Estimation for Semiparametric Models. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
4. BLANCHE, P., DARTIGUES, J.-F. AND JACQMIN-GADDA, H. (2013). Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Statistics in Medicine 32, 5381-5397.
5. CHENG, S. C., FINE, J. P. AND WEI, L. J. (1998). Prediction of cumulative incidence function under the proportional hazards model. Biometrics 54, 219-228.
6. EFRON, B. AND TIBSHIRANI, R. (1997). Improvements on cross-validation: the .632+ bootstrap method. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92, 548-560.
7. FINE, J. P. AND GRAY, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association 446, 496-509.
8. GAIL, M. H. AND PFEIFFER, R. M. (2005). On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk. Biostatistics 6, 227-239.
9. GERDS, T. A., CAI, T. AND SCHUMACHER, M. (2008). The performance of risk prediction models. Biometrical Journal 50, 457-479.
10. GERDS, T. A.,KATTAN, M. W., SCHUMACHER, M. AND YU, C. (2013). Estimating a time-dependent concordance index for survival prediction models with covariate dependent censoring. Statistics in Medicine 32, 2173-2184.
11. GERDS, T. A., SCHEIKE, T. H. AND ANDERSEN, P. K. (2012). Absolute risk regression for competing risks: interpretation, link functions, and prediction. Statistics in Medicine 31, 3921-3930.
12. GRUNKEMEIER, G. L., JIN, R., EIJKEMANS, M. J. AND TAKKENBERG, J. J. (2007). Actual and actuarial probabilities of competing risks: apples and lemons. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 83, 1586-1592.
13. HARRELL, F. E., CALIFF, R. M., PRYOR, D. B., LEE, K. L. AND ROSATI, R. A. (1982). Evaluating the yield of medical tests. Journal of the American Medical Association 247, 2543-2546.
14. HASTIE, T., TIBSHIRANI, R. AND FRIEDMAN, J. H. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd edition, Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer.
15. HEAGERTY, P. J. AND ZHENG, Y. (2005). Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves. Biometrics 61, 92-105.
16. HOFMAN, A., VAN DUIJN, C. M., FRANCO, O. H., IKRAM, M. A., JANSSEN, H. L., KLAVER, C. C., KUIPERS, E. J., NIJSTEN, T. E., STRICKER, B. H., TIEMEIER, H. and others. (2011). The Rotterdam Study: 2012 objectives and design update. European Journal of Epidemiology 26, 657-686.
17. KOLLER, M. T., LEENING, M. J., WOLBERS, M., STEYERBERG, E. W., HUNINK, M. G., SCHOOP, R., HOFMAN, A., BUCHER, H. C., PSATY, B. M., LLOYD-JONES, D. M. and others. (2012). Development and validation of a coronary risk prediction model for older U.S. and European persons in the cardiovascular health study and the Rotterdam Study. Annals of Internal Medicine 157, 389-397.
18. KOLLER, M. T., RAATZ, H., STEYERBERG, E. W. AND WOLBERS, M. (2012). Competing risks and the clinical community: irrelevance or ignorance? Statistics in Medicine 31, 1089-1097.
19. MOGENSEN, U. B., ISHWARAN, H. AND GERDS, T. A. (2012). Evaluating random forests for survival analysis using prediction error curves. Journal of Statistical Software 50, 1-23.
20. NCEP. (2002). Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol inAdults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 106, 3143-3421.
21. PUTTER, H., FIOCCO, M. AND GESKUS, R. B. (2007). Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models. Statistics in Medicine 26, 2389-2430.
22. SAHA, P. AND HEAGERTY, P. J. (2010). Time-dependent predictive accuracy in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics 66, 999-1011.
23. SCHEIKE, T., ZHANG, M. J. AND GERDS, T. A. (2008). Predicting cumulative incidence probability by direct binomial regression. Biometrika 95, 205-220.
24. SCHOOP, R., BEYERSMANN, J., SCHUMACHER, M. AND BINDER, H. (2011). Quantifying the predictive accuracy of time-to-event models in the presence of competing risks. Biometric Journal 53, 88-112.
25. UNO, H.,CAI, T., PENCINA, M. J.,DAGOSTINO, R. B. AND WEI, L. J. (2011). On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Statistics in Medicine 30, 1105-1117.
26. WOLBERS, M.,KOLLER, M. T.,WITTEMAN, J. C. AND STEYERBERG, E. W. (2009). Prognostic models with competing risks: methods and application to coronary risk prediction. Epidemiology 20, 555-561.
27. YAN, G. AND GREENE, T. (2008). Investigating the effects of ties on measures of concordance. Statistics in Medicine 27, 4190-4206.
28. ZHENG, Y., CAI, T., JIN, Y. AND FENG, Z. (2012). Evaluating prognostic accuracy of biomarkers under competing risk. Biometrics 68, 388-396.