Spatial effect of lake landscape on housing price: A case study of the West Lake in Hangzhou, China

Habitat International

Volumn 44, Issue , 2014, Pages 31-40

  Wen, Haizhen ^a   Bu, Xiaoqing ^a   Qin, Zhongfu ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Hedonic price model; Housing price; Lake landscape; Spatial heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; HETEROGENEITY; HOUSING MARKET; LACUSTRINE ENVIRONMENT; PRICE DYNAMICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MODELING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN HOUSING;

CHINA; HANGZHOU; WEST LAKE [HANGZHOU]; ZHEJIANG;

EID: 84901295130     PISSN: 01973975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Anselin L. Spatial externalities and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review 2003, 26(2):153-166.
2. Bond M.T., Seiler V.L., Seiler M.J. Residential real estate prices: a room with a view. The Journal of Real Estate Research 2002, 23(1/2):129-137.
3. Bourassa S., Hoesli M., Peng V. Do housing submarkets really matter?. Journal of Housing Economics 2003, 12(1):12-28.
4. Brown G.M., Pollakowski H.O. Economic valuation of shoreline. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1977, 59(3):272-278.
5. Cameron T.A. Directional heterogeneity in distance profiles in hedonic property value models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2006, 51(1):26-45.
6. Can A. The measurement of neighborhood dynamics in urban house prices. Economic Geography 1990, 66(3):254-272.
7. Can A. Specification and estimation of hedonic housing price models. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1992, 22:453-474.
8. Case B., Clapp J., Dubin R., Rodriguez M. Modeling spatial and temporal house price patterns: a comparison of four models. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2004, 29(2):167-191.
9. Coulson N.E. Really usefully tests of monocentric model. Land Economics 1991, 67(3):299-307.
10. Dubin R. Spatial autocorrelation: a primer. Journal of Housing Economics 1998, 7:304-327.
11. Dubin R.A., Sung C.H. Spatial variation in the price of residential rent gradients in non-monocentric cities. Urban Studies 1987, 24(3):193-204.
12. Goodman A.C. Housing submarkets within urban areas-definitions and evidence. Journal of Regional Science 1981, 21:175-185.
13. Goodman A.C. Housing market segmentation. Journal of Housing Economics 1998, 7:121-143.
14. Hammer T.R., Coughlin R.E., Horniv E.T. The effect of a large urban park on real estate values. American Institute of Planners Journal 1974, 40(4):274-277.
15. Hill E.S., Pugh S., Mullen J. Use of the hedonic method to estimate lake sedimentation impacts on property values in Mountain park and Roswell, GA. Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual meeting, 31 July 2007, Portland, Oregon 2007.
16. Kitchen J.W., hendon W.S. Land values adjacent to an urban neighborhood park. Land Economics 1967, 43(3):357-361.
17. Lansford N.J., Jones L. Marginal price of lake recreation and aesthetics: an hedonic approach. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 1995, 27(1):212-223.
18. Liao W.C., Wang X. Hedonic house prices and spatial quantile regression. Journal of Housing Economics 2012, 21(1):16-27.
19. Liisa T., Antti M. Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2000, 39(2):205-223.
20. Liu B., Zhang J. Study on planning measurements to residential segregation. City Planning Review 2002, 26(12):82-86.
21. Loomis J.B., Feldman M. Estimating the benefits of maintaining adequate lake levels to homeowners using the hedonic property method. Water Resources Research 2003, 39(3):1-6.
22. Mahan B.L., Polasky S., Adams R.M. Valuing urban wetlands: a property price approach. Land Economics 2000, 76(1):100-113.
23. McMillan M. Open space preservation in developing areas: an alternative policy. Land Economics 1974, 50(4):410-417.
24. McMillen D.P. One hundred fifty years of land values in Chicago: a nonparametric approach. Journal of Urban Economics 1996, 40(1):100-124.
25. Michaels R., Smith V. Market segmentation and valuing amenities with hedonic models: the case of hazardous waste sites. Journal of Urban Economics 1990, 28:223-242.
26. Militino A., Ugarte M., Garcia-Reinaldos L. Alternative models for describing spatial dependence among dwelling selling prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2004, 29(2):193-209.
27. Osland L. An application of spatial econometrics in relation to hedonic house price modelling. Journal of Real Estate Research 2010, 32(3):289-320.
28. Pace R.K., Barry R., Sirmans C.F. Spatial statistics and real estate. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 1998, 17(1):5-13.
29. Peiser R.B., Schwann G.M. The private value of public open space within subdivisions. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 1993, 10(2):91-104.
30. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 1974, 82(1):34-55.
31. Sander H.A., Polasky S. The value of views and open space: estimates from a hedonic pricing model for Ramsey County, Minnesota, USA. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(3):837-845.
32. Schnare A., Struyk R. Segmentation in urban housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics 1976, 4:146-166.
33. Seiler M.J., Bond M.T., Seiler V.L. The impact of world class Great Lakes water views on residential property values. Appraisal Journal 2001, 69(3):287-295.
34. Shi Y.S., Guo H.N. Temporal-spatial impacts of the shanghai south railway station on housing prices. Acta Geographical Sinica 2009, 64(2):167-176.
35. Shi Y.S., Zhang R. Temporal-spatial impact effects of large-scale parks on housing price: exemplified by the Huangxing Park in Shanghai. Geographical Research 2010, 29(3):510-520.
36. Söderberg B., Janssen C. Estimating distance gradients for apartment properties. Urban Studies 2001, 38(1):61-79.
37. Thibodeau T.G. Marking single-family property values to market. Real Estate Economics 2003, 31(1):1-22.
38. Wall M.M. Aclose look at the spatial structure implied by the CAR and SAR models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2004, 121:311-324.
39. Wang X. The research of district difference about marketable dwelling's price in central part of Tianjin. Journal of Tianjin Normal University 2002, 22(2):70-74.
40. Weiche J.C., Zerbst R.H. The externalities of neighborhood parks: an empirical investigation. Land Economics 1973, 49(1):99-105.
41. Wen H.Z., Jia S.H. Housing characteristics and hedonic price: based on hedonic price model. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science) 2004, 38(10):38-42.
42. Wen H.Z., Zhang Z.L., Zhang L. An empirical analysis on the spatial effect of housing price based on the spatial econometric model: a case study in Hangzhou. Theory and Practice of Systems Engineering 2011, 31(9):1661-1667.
43. Wu Q., Cui G. The differential characteristics of residential space in Nanjing and its mechanism. City Planning Review 1999, 23(12):23-26. 35.
44. Wu D.M., Guo Z.X., Chen H.G. Impact of Lake landscape on urban residential property V alues in Nanjing. Resources Science 2008, 30(10):1503-1509.
45. Xu X. An analysis on the spatial distribution characters of commercial residential price in Shanghai. Economic Geography 1997, 17(1):80-87.
46. Yan X., Zhou C., Xu S., Cheng H. Development of commodity housing in Guangzhou and its surrounding areas. Acta Geographical Sinica 2001, 56(5):570-580.
47. Yu L., Zheng S.Q., Liu H.Y. The spatial variation and affecting factors of the housing Price gradients: the case of Beijing. Economic Geography 2008, 28(3):406-410.
48. Zhang B. Spatial distribution and city value of commercial housing prices. Price Theory & Practice 2006, 10:49-50.
49. Zhang X. The study on spatial distribution characters of residence price in Dalian. Northern Economy and Trade 2007, 7:8-9.
50. Zheng Z. Astudy on the spatial distribution characteristics of commodity residential prices in Guangzhou. Tropical Geography 2001, 21(1):22-26.
51. Zhong H.Y., Zhang A.L., Cai Y.Y. Impacts of the Nanhu Lake in Wuhan City on the price of peripheral houses: empirical research based on hedonic model. China Land Science 2009, 23(12):63-68.