Accelerometry measuring the outcome of robot-supported upper limb training in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Lemmens, Ryanne J M ^a,b   Timmermans, Annick A A ^a,b,c   Janssen Potten, Yvonne J M ^a,b   Pulles, Sanne A N T D ^b   Geers, Richard P J ^b   Bakx, Wilbert G M ^b,d   Smeets, Rob J E M ^a,b,e   Seelen, Henk A M ^a,b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology   (Netherlands)

^c HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d Adelante Rehabilitation Centre   (Netherlands)

^e MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ADULT; ARM EXERCISE; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE INTENSITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MUSCLE TRAINING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOTICS; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT DURATION; ACCELEROMETRY; AGED; ARM; CONVALESCENCE; KINESIOTHERAPY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACCELEROMETRY; AGED; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84901289316     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096414     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJ (1999) The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil 21: 357-364. (Pubitemid 29410890)
2. Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S (2005) Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke 36: 1480-1484. (Pubitemid 40967516)
3. Wolfe CD (2000) The impact of stroke. Br Med Bull 56: 275-286.
4. Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ (2006) Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 43: 171-184.
5. Page SJ, Gater DR, Bach YRP (2004) Reconsidering the motor recovery plateau in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85: 1377-1381. (Pubitemid 39024445)
6. Conroy SS, Whitall J, Dipietro L, Jones-Lush LM, Zhan M, et al. (2011) Effect of gravity on robot-assisted motor training after chronic stroke: a randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92: 1754-1761.
7. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI (2008) Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22: 111-121. (Pubitemid 351287594)
8. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, et al. (2010) Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 362: 1772-1783.
9. Mehrholz J, Hadrich A, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M (2012) Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6: CD006876.
10. Mehrholz J, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M (2008) Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD006876.
11. World Health Organisation (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva.
12. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, Van der Wees PJ, et al. (2004) The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil 18: 833-862. (Pubitemid 39642264)
13. Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Liao WW, Lin KC, Wu KY, et al. (2011) Effects of treatment intensity in upper limb robot-assisted therapy for chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25: 503-511.
14. Liao WW, Wu CY, Hsieh YW, Lin KC, Chang WY (2012) Effects of robotassisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 26: 111-120.
15. Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2009) A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23: 505-514.
16. Lemmens R, Timmermans A, Janssen-Potten Y, Smeets R, Seelen H (2012) Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review. BMC Neurology 12: 21.
17. Uswatte G, Taub E (2005) Implications of the Learned Nonuse Formulation for Measuring Rehabilitation Outcomes: Lessons From Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy. Rehabilitation Psychology 50: 34-42. (Pubitemid 40344139)
18. Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, Schaefer SY, Birkenmeier RL (2012) Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. J Hand Ther 26: 104-114;quiz 115.
19. Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, et al. (2005) Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86: 1498-1501. (Pubitemid 40909927)
20. van der Pas SC, Verbunt JA, Breukelaar DE, van Woerden R, Seelen HA (2011) Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92: 1437-1442.
21. Cambridge-Neurotechnology-Ltd (2008) The Actiwatch User Manual.
22. Timmermans AAA, Lemmens RJM, Monfrance M, Geers RPJ, Bakx W, et al. (2014) Effects of task-oriented robot training on arm function, arm activity and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 11.
23. Timmermans AA, Seelen HA, Geers RP, Saini PK, Winter S, et al. (2010) Sensor-based arm skill training in chronic stroke patients: results on treatment outcome, patient motivation, and system usability. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 18: 284-292.
24. Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF (1993) Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. Jama 269: 2386-2391. (Pubitemid 23129378)
25. Gauthier LDF, Joanette Y (1989) The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 11: 49-54.
26. Ferber S, Karnath HO (2001) How to assess spatial neglect-line bisection or cancellation tasks? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 23: 599-607. (Pubitemid 34074693)
27. De Bleser R, Willmes K, Graetz P, Hagoort P (1991) De Akense Afasie Test (2). Logopedie en Foniatrie 63: 207-2017.
28. van Heugten CM, Huygelen K, v d Sande P (2004) [Cognitive screening in stroke patients in rehabilitation: standards for clinical practice]. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 35: 196-202.
29. WMA-Declaration-of-Helsinki (2008) WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.
30. Timmermans AAA, Geers RPJ, Franck JA, Dobbelsteijn P, Spooren AIF, et al. T-TOAT: A method of task-oriented arm training for stroke patients suitable for implementation of exercises in rehabilitation technology; 2009 June 23-26, 2009; Kyoto International Conference Center, Japan. pp. 98-102.
31. Magill RA (2007) Motor Learning and Control. Concepts and Applications Eigth edition ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies. pp. 2-19.
32. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Barman J, Crago J (2006) Contribution of the shaping and restraint components of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy to treatment outcome. NeuroRehabilitation 21: 147-156. (Pubitemid 44253289)
33. Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, Carey LM (2009) Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup Ther Int 16: 175-189.
34. Wu C, Trombly CA, Lin K, Tickle-Degnen L (2000) A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: influences of object availability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81: 95-101. (Pubitemid 30036881)
35. Schmidt RA, Lee D (1999) Retention and Transfer. Motor Control and Learning A Behavioral Emphasis pp. 432-459.
36. Schmidt RA, Lee D (1999) Conditions of Practice Motor Control and Learning A Behavioral Emphasis pp. 321-363.
37. Linde Van der RQ, Lammertse P, Frederiksen E, Ruiter B. The HapticMaster, a new high-performance haptic interface; 2002; Edinburgh. pp. 1-5.
38. Timmermans AA, Lemmens RJ, Geers RP, Smeets RJ, Seelen HA (2011) A comparison of treatment effects after sensor- and robot-based task-oriented arm training in highly functional stroke patients. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011: 3507-3510.
39. Kahn LE, Zygman ML, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2006) Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 3: 12.
40. Hesse S. What does the clinician expect from machines and robots in Neurorehabilitation?; 2007; Berlin, Germany.
41. Timmermans AA, Spooren AI, Kingma H, Seelen HA (2010) Influence of task-oriented training content on skilled arm-hand performance in stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24: 858-870.
42. Michielsen ME, Selles RW, Stam HJ, Ribbers GM, Bussmann JB (2012) Quantifying nonuse in chronic stroke patients: a study into paretic, nonparetic, and bimanual upper-limb use in daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93: 1975-1981.
43. Fortune E, Tierney M, Scanaill CN, Bourke A, Kennedy N, et al. (2011) Activity level classification algorithm using SHIMMER wearable sensors for individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011: 3059-3062.
44. Altun K, Barshan B, Tuncel O (2010) Comparative study on classifying human activities with miniature inertial and magnetic sensors. Patternt Recognition 43: 3605-3620.
45. Barman J, Uswatte G, Sarkar N, Ghaffari T, Sokal B (2011) Sensor-enabled RFID system for monitoring arm activity in daily life. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011: 5219-5223.
46. Lemmens RJM, Seelen HAM, Janssen-Potten YJ, Timmermans AAA, Eerden A, et al. Reliability of registrations of activities of daily living, measured by 9-DOF-sensors in healthy persons; 2013; Amherst, Massachusetts.
47. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, Hughes R, Volpe B, et al. (2002) Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 22: 8297-8304. (Pubitemid 35379135)
48. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ (2013) Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant? Int J Stroke 8: 25-32.
49. Peter O, Fazekas G, Zsiga K, Denes Z (2011) Robot-mediated upper limb physiotherapy: review and recommendations for future clinical trials. Int J Rehabil Res 34: 196-202.