Multitemporal forest change analysis a case study: Sariyer region

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives

Volumn 33, Issue , 2000, Pages 939-946

  Musaoglu, Nebiye ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

GCP; ISODATA; Landsat TM; RMS; Sariyer

Indexed keywords

REMOTE SENSING;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CLASSIFICATION RESULTS; EDUCATION AND RESEARCHES; ISODATA; LANDSAT TM; MULTITEMPORAL DATA SETS; SARIYER;

FORESTRY;

EID: 84901284108     PISSN: 16821750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Bernstein, R., 1983. Image Geometry and Rectification, The Manual of Remote Sensing, American Society of Photogrammetry, R. N. Colwell.
2. Botkin, D.B., Estes, J.E, MacDonald, R.M., Wilson, M.V., 1984. Studying The Earth Vegetation From Space, Bio Science, 34181: 508-514.
3. Chavez, P.S., MacKinnon, D.J., 1994. Automatic Detection of Vegetation Changes in the Southwestern U.S Using Remotely Sensed Images, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol: 60, No: 5, 571-583.
4. Cohen, J, 1960. A Coefficient of Aggrement for Nominal Scale, Educational and Physchological Measurement, 20: 37-46.
5. Congoltan, R.G., 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37: 35-46.
6. Congoltan, R.G., Mead, R., A., 1983. A Quantitative Method to Test for Consistency and Correctness in Phote Interpretation, PE&RS, 49 (1): 69-74.
7. Cokun, G., Örmeci, C., Asan, Ü., Yeil, A., Musaoolu, N., Kaya, 1998. Sayýsal Uydu Verileri Ýle (LandsatTM, Spot XS) Ýstanbul-Gaziosmanpapa Orman Ýpletme peflioine Baolý Tayakadýn ve amlar Yörelerinde Mecere Tipi Ayýrýmýnýn Araptýrýlmasý, Proje raporu, TÜBÝTAK Proje no: 1622.
8. Deckert, C., Bolstad, P.V., 1996. Forest Canopy, Terrain and Distance Effects on Global Positioning System Point Accuracy, Photogrammetric Engineering&Remote Sensing, Vol: 62, No: 3, pp. 317-321.
9. Dobson, E. L, Jensen, J.R., Lacy, R.B., Smith, F.G., 1995. A Land Cover Charactarization Methodology for Large Area Inventories, ACSM/ASPRS Proceedings, Charlotte, North Caroline, pp. 786-795.
10. Elijah, W., Ramsey, M., Sensen, J.R., 1996. Remote Sensing and Mangrove Wetlands Relating Canopy Spectra to Site-Specific Data, Photogrammetric Engineering&Remote Sensing, Vol. 62, No: 8, pp. 939-948.
11. Estes, J. E., 1992, "Technology and Policy Issues Impact Global Monitoring," GIS World, 5(10): 52-55.
12. Foody, G.M., 1992. On the compensation for Chance Agreement in Image Classification Accuracy Assessment, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58(10): 1459-1460.
13. Hame, T., Rauste, Y., 1995. Multi Temporal Satellite Data in Forest Mapping and Fire Monitoring, EARSel Advances in Remote Sensing, Vol.4, No: 3, pp. 93-101.
14. Jacobberger-Jellison, P.A, 1994. Detection of post-drought Environmental Conditions in the Tombuctou Region, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15(16), pp. 3138-3197.
15. nd Edition. NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 257-277.
16. Jensen, J. R., S. Narumalani, 1992, "Improved Remote Sensing and GIS Reliability Diagrams, Image Genealogy Diagrams, and Thematic Map Legends to Enhance Communication," International Archives of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 6(B6): 125-132.
17. Johnson, R. D., 1994. Change Vector Analysis for Disaster Assessment: A Case Study of Hurricane Andrew, Geocarto International, 1, pp. 41-45.
18. Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer, R.W., 1987. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, John Wiley Sons, USA.
19. Michener, W.K., Houhoulis, P.F., 1997. Detection of Vegetation Changes Associated with Extensive Flooding in a Forested Ecosystem, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 1363-1374.
20. Musaoglu N., Ormeci, C., 1999. Monitoring Of Forest Change By Using Multi-Temporal Satellite Data, EARsel, Remote Sensing in the 21th Century: Economic and Environmental Applications, pp. 41-45.
21. Musaoolu, N., 1999. Possibilities Of Determining The Types Of Tree Stocks In The Forest Lands And The Units Of Growing Sites By Means Of Satellite Images Obtained From The Electro-Optical And Active Microwave Sensors, Phd. Thesis, Itu Institute Of Science And Technology, Ýstanbul.
22. Peters, A.J., Reed, B.C., Eve, M.D., Havstad, K.M., 1993. Satellite Assessment of Drought Impact on Native Plant Communuties of Southastern New Mexico, U.S.A., Journal of Arid Environments, 24: 305-319.
23. R. Douglas Ramsey, Introductory Digital Image Processing, Vol.3, 5.2 Geometric Correction of Remotely Sensed Data, http://www.cla.sc.edu/geog/rslab/rsccnew/mod5/5-2/5-2.html (10 February 2000).
24. Rosenfield, A., Kak, A.C., 1976. Digital Picture Processing, Academia Press, New York.
25. Skidmore, A.K., Watford, F., Luckananurug, P., Royan, P.J., 1996. An Operational GIS Expert System for Mapping Forest Soils, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol: 62, No: 5, pp. 501-511.
26. Stehmen, V.S., 1996. Estimating the Kappa Coefficent and its Variance Under Stratified Random Sampling, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol.62., No: 4, pp. 401-407.
27. Sunar, F., Musaoglu, N., 1998. Merging Multiresolution Spot P and Landsat TM Data: The Effects and Advantages" International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 219-224.
28. Treitz, M.P., Hawarth, P.J., Gang, P., 1992. Application of Satellite and GIS Technologies for Land Cover and Land Use Mapping at the Rural Urban Fringe: A Case Study, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol: 58, No: 4, pp. 439-448.
29. Varjo, J., 1995. Forest Change Detection by Satellite Remote Sensing in Eastern Finland, EARSel Advances in Remote Sensing, Vol. 4, No. 3.
30. Zhenkui, M., Redmond, L., R., 1995. Tau Coefficients for Accuracy Assessment of Classification of Remote Sensing Data, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 435-439.