Rheological characterization of fibrillated cellulose suspensions via bucket vane viscometer

Cellulose

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1305-1312

  Mohtaschemi, Mikael ^a   Dimic Misic, Katarina ^a   Puisto, Antti ^a   Korhonen, Marko ^a   Maloney, Thaddeus ^a   Paltakari, Jouni ^a   Alava, Mikko J ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Nanocellulose; Non Newtonian; Rheology; Vane viscometer

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; RHEOLOGY; SHEAR DEFORMATION; VISCOMETERS; VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT;

CORRECTION ALGORITHMS; FLOW BEHAVIORS; NANO-CELLULOSE; NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE; NON-NEWTONIAN; RHEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION; WIDE GAP;

CHARACTERIZATION;

EID: 84901246061     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-014-0235-1     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Agoda-Tandjawa G, Durand S, Gaillard C, Garnier C, Doublier JL (2012) Rheological behaviour and microstructure of microfibrillated cellulose suspensions/low-methoxyl pectin mixed systems. Effect of calcium ions. Carbohydr Polym 87(2): 1045-1057.
2. Ahola S, Myllytie P, Österberg M, Teerinen T, Laine J (2008) Effect of polymer adsorption on cellulose nanofibril water binding capacity and aggregation. BioResources 3(4): 1315-1328.
3. Ancey C (2005) Solving the Couette inverse problem using a wavelet-vaguelette decomposition. J Rheol 49(2): 441-460.
4. Barnes H, Carnali J (1990) The vane-in-cup as a novel rheometer geometry for shear thinning and thixotropic materials. J Rheol 34(6): 841-866.
5. Barnes HA, Nguyen QD (2001) Rotating vane rheometry-a review. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 98(1): 1-14.
6. Chatzimina M, Gerogiou G, Alexandrou A (2009) Wall shear rates in circular Couette Flow of a Herschel-Bulkley fluid. Appl Rheol 19(3): 34288.
7. Corrêa AC, de Morais Teixeira E, Pessan LA, Mattoso LHC (2010) Cellulose nanofibers from curaua fibers. Cellulose 17(6): 1183-1192.
8. Coussot P (2005) Rheometry of pastes, suspensions, and granular materials: applications in industry and environment. Wiley, New York.
9. Dimic-Misic K, Puisto A, Gane P, Nieminen K, Alava MJ, Paltakari J, Maloney T (2013a) The role of MFC/NFC swelling in the rheological behavior and dewatering of high consistency furnishes. Cellulose 20(6): 2847-2861.
10. Dimic-Misic K, Puisto A, Paltakari J, Alava MJ, Maloney T (2013b) The influence of shear on the dewatering of high consistency nanofibrillated cellulose furnishes. Cellulose 20(4): 1853-1864.
11. Divoux T, Tamarii D, Barentin C, Manneville S (2010) Transient shear banding in a simple yield stress fluid. Phys Rev Lett 104(20): 1-4.
12. Divoux T, Barentin C, Manneville S (2011) From stress-induced fluidization processes to Herschel-Bulkley behaviour in simple yield stress fluids. Soft Matter 7(18): 8409-8418.
13. Divoux T, Grenard V, Manneville S (2013) Rheological hysteresis in soft glassy materials. Phys Rev Lett 110(1): 018304.
14. Fisher DT, Clayton SA, Boger DV, Scales PJ (2007) The bucket rheometer for shear stress-shear rate measurement of industrial suspensions. J Rheol 51(5): 821-831.
15. Haimoni A, Hannant D (1988) Developments in the shear vane test to measure the gel strength of oilwell cement slurry. Adv Cem Res 1(4): 221-229.
16. Heirman G, Vandewalle L, van Gemert D, Wallevik O (2008) Integration approach of the Couette inverse problem of powder type self-compacting concrete in a wide-gap concentric cylinder rheometer. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 150(2-3): 93-103.
17. Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. In: Applied Polymer Symposium Conference: 9 Cellulose Conference No CONF-8205234, vol 37.
18. Horvath AE, Lindström T, Laine J (2006) On the indirect polyelectrolyte titration of cellulosic fibers. Conditions for charge stoichiometry and comparison with ESCA. Langmuir 22(2): 824-830.
19. Iotti M, Gregersen ØW, Moe S, Lenes M (2010) Rheological studies of microfibrillar cellulose water dispersions. J Polym Environ 19(1): 137-145.
20. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3(1): 71-85.
21. Junka K, Filpponen I, Lindström T, Laine J (2013) Titrimetric methods for the determination of surface and total charge of functionalized nanofibrillated/microfibrillated cellulose (NFC/MFC). Cellulose 20(6): 2887-2895.
22. Karppinen A, Vesterinen AH, Saarinen T, Pietikäinen P, Seppälä J (2011) Effect of cationic polymethacrylates on the rheology and flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 18(6): 1381-1390.
23. Karppinen A, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Laukkanen A, Nuopponen M, Seppälä J (2012) Flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose in shear flow. Cellulose 19(6): 1807-1819.
24. Kieweg SL, Katz DF (2006) Squeezing flows of vaginal gel formulations relevant to microbicide drug delivery. J Biomech Eng 128(4): 540-553.
25. Klein CO, Spiess HW, Calin A, Balan C, Wilhelm M (2007) Separation of the nonlinear oscillatory response into a superposition of linear, strain hardening, strain softening, and wall slip response. Macromolecules 40(12): 4250-4259.
26. Krieger IM, Samuel HM (1952) Direct determination of the flow curves of non-Newtonian fluids. J Appl Phys 23(1): 147-149.
27. Lasseuguette E, Roux D, Nishiyama Y (2008) Rheological properties of microfibrillar suspension of TEMPO-oxidized pulp. Cellulose 15(3): 425-433.
28. Lettinga MP, Manneville S (2009) Competition between shear banding and wall slip in wormlike micelles. Phys Rev Lett 103(24): 248302.
29. Manneville S, Salmon JB, Colin A (2004) A spatio-temporal study of rheo-oscillations in a sheared lamellar phase using ultrasound. Eur Phys J E 13(2): 197-212.
30. Mewis J, Wagner NJ (2009) Thixotropy. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 147: 214-227.
31. Mishra SP, Thirree J, Manent AS, Chabot B, Daneault C (2010) Ultrasound-catalyzed TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose for the production of nanocellulose: effect of process variables. BioResources 6(1): 121-143.
32. Møller PCF, Mewis J, Bonn D (2006) Yield stress and thixotropy: on the difficulty of measuring yield stresses in practice. Soft Matter 2(4): 274-283.
33. Nakagaito AN, Fujimura A, Sakai T, Hama Y, Yano H (2009) Production of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC)-reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) nanocomposites from sheets obtained by a papermaking-like process. Compos Sci Technol 69(7): 1293-1297.
34. Ovarlez G, Rodts S, Ragouilliaux A, Coussot P, Goyon J, Colin A (2008) Wide-gap Couette flows of dense emulsions: local concentration measurements, and comparison between macroscopic and local constitutive law measurements through magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Rev E 78(3): 036307.
35. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8(6): 1934-1941.
36. Pääkkö M, Vapaavuori J, Silvennoinen R, Kosonen H, Ankerfors M, Lindström T, Berglund LA, Ikkala O (2008) Long and entangled native cellulose I nanofibers allow flexible aerogels and hierarchically porous templates for functionalities. Soft Matter 4(12): 2492-2499.
37. Puisto A, Illa X, Mohtaschemi M, Alava MJ (2012) Modeling the viscosity and aggregation of suspensions of highly anisotropic nanoparticles. Eur Phys J E 35(1): 1-7.
38. Richmond F (2012) The coating of nanofibrillated cellulose onto paper using flooded and metered size press, methods. 12PaperCon.
39. Saarikoski E, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Seppälä J (2012) Flocculated flow of microfibrillated cellulose water suspensions: an imaging approach for characterisation of rheological behaviour. Cellulose 19(3): 647-659.
40. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8(8): 2485-2491.
41. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17(3): 459-494.
42. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Habibi Y, Pawlak JJ (2010) The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: water interactions and physical properties for packaging applications. Cellulose 17(4): 835-848.
43. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Habibi Y, Pawlak JJ (2011) A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 18(4): 1097-1111.
44. Subramanian R, Hiltunen E, Gane PA (2011) Potential use of micro-and nanofibrillated cellulose composites exemplified by paper. In: Cellulose fibers: bio-and nano-polymer composites, Springer, pp 121-152.
45. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR (1984) Microfibrillated cellulose-a new composition of commercial significance. Nonwovens SympNotes 37(2): 115-124.
46. Walls H, Caines SB, Sanchez AM, Khan SA (2003) Yield stress and wall slip phenomena in colloidal silica gels. J Rheol 47(4): 847-868.
47. Yeow YL, Ko WC, Tang PPP (2000) Solving the inverse problem of Couette viscometry by Tikhonov regularization. J Rheol 44(6): 1335-1351.
48. Yeow YL, Wickramasinghe SR, Leong YK, Han B (2002) Model-independent relationships between hematocrit, blood viscosity, and yield stress derived from Couette viscometry data. Biotechnol prog 18(5): 1068-1075.