A decision support tool for assessing scenario acceptability using a hierarchy of indicators with compensabilities and importance weights

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 43, Issue , 2014, Pages 306-314

  Van Der Voet, Hilko ^a   Van Der Heijden, Gerie W A M ^a   Kruisselbrink, Johannes W ^a   Tromp, Seth Oscar ^a   Rijgersberg, Hajo ^a   Van Bussel, Lenny G J ^a   Van Asselt, Esther D ^a   Van Der Fels Klerx, H J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Compromising; Interactive software; Multi criteria decision making; Risk benefit assessment; Scenario analysis; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ECONOMICS; PIECEWISE LINEAR TECHNIQUES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

COMPROMISING; INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; RISK BENEFITS; SCENARIO ANALYSIS;

RISK PERCEPTION;

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; ASSESSMENT METHOD; BIOINDICATOR; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; POLICY MAKING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WEIGHT;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84901187993     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.022     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. J.P. Brans, and P. Vincke A preference ranking organisation method: The PROMETHEE method for MCDM Management Science 31 1985 647 656
2. I.J.M. de Boer, and A.M.G. Cornelissen A method using sustainability indicators to compare conventional and animal-friendly egg production systems Poultry Science 81 2002 173 181 (Pubitemid 39622776)
3. L. Duckstein, and S. Opricovic Multiobjective optimization in river basin development Water Resources Research 16 1980 14 20 (Pubitemid 10460125)
4. M.T. Escobar, and J.M. Moreno-Jiménez The hierarchical compromise programming Top 5 1997 253 281
5. M.T. Escobar, and J.M. Moreno-Jiménez A linkage between the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Compromise Programming models Omega 30 2002 359 365
6. P.R. Kleindorfer, K. Singhal, and L.N. Van Wassenhove Sustainable operations management Production and Operations Management 14 2005 482 492 (Pubitemid 43625027)
7. S. Opricovic, and G.H. Tzeng Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS European Journal of Operational research 156 2004 445 455
8. S. Opricovic, and G.H. Tzeng Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods European Journal of Operational research 178 2007 514 529 (Pubitemid 44750475)
9. S.D. Pokehar, and M. Ramachandran Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning - a review Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 8 2004 365 381
10. H.V. Rowley, G.M. Peters, S. Lundie, and S.J. Moore Aggregating sustainability indicators: beyond the weighted sum Journal of Environmental Management 111 2012 24 33
11. B. Roy The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods Theory and Decision 31 1991 49 73
12. T.L. Saaty How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process European Journal of Operational Research 48 1990 9 26
13. M.J. Scott, and E.K. Antonsson Aggregation functions for engineering design trade-offs Fuzzy Sets and Systems 99 1998 253 264 (Pubitemid 128654971)
14. M.J. Scott, and E.K. Antonsson Compensation and weights for trade-offs in engineering design: beyond the weighted sum Journal of Mechanical Design 127 2005 1045 1055 (Pubitemid 41709562)
15. E.D. van Asselt, L.G.J. van Bussel, H. van der Voet, G.W.A.M. van der Heijden, S.O. Tromp, H. Rijgersberg, F. van Evert, C.P.A. van Wagenberg, and H.J. van der Fels-Klerx A protocol for evaluating the sustainability of agri-food production systems - a case study on potato production in peri-urban agriculture in The Netherlands Ecological Indicators 43 2014 315 321
16. P.L. Yu A class of solutions for group decision problems Management Science 19 1973 936 946