메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 168-188

EU support and party choice

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 84901155524     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter
Times cited : (31)

References (1)
  • 1
    • 84901185425 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Often, failed or near-failed referenda are interpreted as evidence of popular apprehension about further European integration. In many of such instances, however, support for or opposition to the national government that was responsible for the topic of the referendum was of greater importance in explaining referendum votes than support for or opposition to further European integration see, e.g., Franklin, Marsh, and McLaren 1994; Franklin, Marsh, and Wlezien 1994; Franklin, van der Eijk, and Marsh 1995; for a contrary view see Garry, Marsh, and Sinnott 2005. For further discussion about this domestic background see also de Vreese and Semetko 2001, 2002 and Franklin 2002a
    • Often, failed or near-failed referenda are interpreted as evidence of popular apprehension about (further) European integration. In many of such instances, however, support for or opposition to the national government that was responsible for the topic of the referendum was of greater importance in explaining referendum votes than support for or opposition to further European integration (see, e.g., Franklin, Marsh, and McLaren 1994; Franklin, Marsh, and Wlezien 1994; Franklin, van der Eijk, and Marsh 1995; for a contrary view see Garry, Marsh, and Sinnott 2005). For further discussion about this domestic background see also de Vreese and Semetko (2001, 2002) and Franklin (2002a).


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.