Soft computing models based feature selection for TRUS prostate cancer image classification

Soft Computing

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1165-1176

  Thangavel, K ^a   Manavalan, R ^b  

^a PERIYAR UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b K S RANGASAMY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE AUTONOMOUS   (India)

Author keywords

ACO; DBSCAN; GA; GA ACO; M3 filter; Prostate cancer; QR ACO; Rough set

Indexed keywords

DATA VISUALIZATION; DISEASES; GALLIUM; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; ROUGH SET THEORY; SOFT COMPUTING; ULTRASONIC IMAGING;

ACO; DBSCAN; GA-ACO; M3-FILTER; PROSTATE-CANCER; QR-ACO;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84901033064     PISSN: 14327643     EISSN: 14337479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-013-1135-2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Acampora G, Lee C-S, Vitiello A, Wang M-H (2012) Evaluating cardiac health through semantic soft computing techniques. Soft Comput 16(7): 1165-1181.
2. Al-Ani A (2005) Feature subset selection using ant colony optimization. Int J Comput Intell 2: 53-58.
3. Alpigini JJ, Peters JF, Skowronek J, Zhong N (eds) (2002) Rough sets and current trends in computing. In: Proceedings of the third international conference, lecture notes in computer science 2475, Springer, New York.
4. Beligiannis G, Hatzilygeroudis I, Koutsojannis C, Prentzas J (2006) A GA driven intelligent systemfor medical diagnosis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 4251 LNAI-I, pp 968-975.
5. Bins J, Draper BA (2001) Feature selection from huge feature sets. In: Proceedings of the eighth IEEE international conference on computer vision, ICCV 2001, vol 2, pp 159-165.
6. Couceiro MS, Rocha RP, Ferreira NMF, Machado JAT (2012) Introducing the fractional-order Darwinian PSO. Signal Image Video Process 6(3): 343-350 (Springer-Verlag).
7. De Falco I (2011) A differential evolution-based system supporting medical diagnosis through automatic knowledge extraction from databases. In: IEEE international conference on bioinformatics and biomedicine (BIBM), institute of high performance computing and networking, national research council of Italy (ICAR-CNR), Naples, Italy, 12-15 Nov 2011, pp 321-326.
8. Devendran V et al (2008) Texture based scene categorization using artificial neural networks and support vector machines: a comparative study. ICGST-GVIP 8(IV): 45-52.
9. Goldberg D (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, 1st edn. Addison Wesley, USA.
10. Jensen R, Shen Q (2008) Computational intelligence and feature selection: rough and fuzzy approaches. Wiley, New york.
11. John GH, Kohavi R, Pfleger K (1994) Irrelevant features and the subset selection problem. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on, machine learning, pp 121-129.
12. Kostek B (1999) Soft computing in acoustics: applications of neural networks. Fuzzy logic and rough sets to musical acoustics. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
13. Li G-Z, Meng H-H, Yang MQ, Yang JY (2009) Combining support vector regression with feature selection for multivariate calibration. Neural Comput Appl Springer 18(7): 813-820.
14. Lin TY, Cercone N (1997) Rough sets and data mining: analysis of imprecise data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
15. Liu H, Motoda H (eds) (1998) Feature extraction construction and selection: a data mining perspective. Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
16. Manavalan R, Thangavel K (2011a) Evaluation of textural feature extraction methods for prostate cancer TRUS medical images. Int J Comput Appl 36(12): 33-39.
17. Manavalan R, Thangavel K (2011b) TRUS image segmentation using morphological operators and DBSCAN clustering. In: Proceedings of the world congress on information and communication technologies (WICT), pp 898-903, 11-14 Dec 2011.
18. Manavalan R, Thangavel T (2012) Comparative analysis of feature extraction methods for the classification of prostate cancer from TRUS medical images. IJCSI Int J Comput Sci Issues 9[1(2)].
19. Mantzaris D, Anastassopoulos G, Iliadis L, Adamopoulos A (2009) An evolutionary technique for medical diagnostic risk factors selection. Artif Intell Appl Innov III, IFIP Int Fed Inf Process 296: 195-203.
20. Di Martino F, Loia V, Sessa S (2010) Fuzzy transforms method and attribute dependency in data analysis. Inf Sci 180(4): 493-505.
21. Mishra D, Rath AK, Acharya M, Jena T (2009) Rough ACO: a hybridized model for feature selection in gene expression data. Int J Comput Commun Technol 1(1): 85-98.
22. Modrzejewski M (1993) Feature selection using rough sets theory. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on machine learning, pp 213-226.
23. Othman AA, Tizhoosh HR (2011) Evolving fuzzy image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ), pp 1603-1609, 27-30 June 2011.
24. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11(5): 341-356.
25. Rashidy Kanan H, Faez K (2008) An improved feature selection method based on ant colony optimization (ACO) evaluated on face recognition system. Appl Math Comput 205: 716-725.
26. Sheikhan M, Mohammadi N (2011) Neural-based electricity load forecasting using hybrid of GA and ACO for feature selection, neural computing and applications. Springer verlag London Limited, Guildford.
27. Thangavel K, Karnan M, Pethalakshmi A (2005) Performance analysis of rough reduct algorithms in mammograms. Int J Graph Vis Image Process 8: 13-21.
28. Thangavel K, Manavalan R, Laurence Aroquiaraj I (2009) Removal of speckle noise from ultrasound medical image based on special filters: comparative study. ICGST Int J Graph Vis Image Process GVIP 09(3): 25-32.
29. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory, chapter 5. Springer, New York.
30. Vapnik V (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York.
31. Wu T, Xie K, Nie C, Song G (2012) An adaption of relief for redundant feature elimination. Advances in neural networks. Springer, Berlin, pp 73-81.
32. Yang C-H, Shih T-M, Chuang L-Y (2009) Reducing SAGE data using genetic algorithms. Int J Inf Math Sci 5(4): 268-272.