Public perceptions of rural landscapes in land consolidation procedures in Poland

Land Use Policy

Volumn 39, Issue , 2014, Pages 313-319

  Kupidura, Adrianna ^a   Łuczewski, Michał ^b   Home, Robert ^c   Kupidura, Przemysław ^a  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^c RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF ORGANIC AGRICULTURE FIBL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Consolidation procedure; Landscape perception; Landscape value; Rural landscape

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901026861     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bell P., Baum A., Fisher J., Greene T. Psychologia Środowiskowa 2004, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
2. Bourassa S. A paradigm for landscape aesthetics. Environment and Behavior 1990, 22:787-812.
3. Danilova E. Social Identities in Poland and Russia 2003, Forum 19., (accessed 25.06.12). http://www.oei.fu-berlin.de/media/publikationen/boi/boi_19/03_danilova.pdf.
4. Danto A. The Abuse of Beauty: Aesthetics and the Concept of Art 2003, Open Court, Chicago, IL.
5. Dewey J. Kunst als Erfahrung 1934/1998, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt. 3rd edn.
6. Egbert M. The English Landscape Garden and the Romantic-Era Novel: Changing Concepts of Space, Cardiff Corvey: Reading the Romantic Text (November 2000) 2000, (28.01.08). http://www.cf.ac.uk/encap/corvey/articles/cc05_n01.html.
7. Gobster P.H. Ecological esthetic: integrating esthetic and biodiversity values. Journal of Forestry 1995, 93:6-10.
8. Hartig T., Staats H. Linking preference for environments with their restorative quality. From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning: Aspects of Integration, Education and Application 2005, 279-292. Springer, Dordrecht. B. Tress, G. Tress, G. Fry, P. Opdam (Eds.).
9. Home R., Bauer N., Hunziker M. Cultural and biological determinants in the evaluation of urban green spaces. Environment and Behavior 2010, 42:494-523.
10. Hunziker M. The spontaneous reafforstation in abandoned agricultural lands: perception and aesthetical assessement by locals and tourists. Landscape and Urban Planning 1995, 31:399-410.
11. Hunziker M., Buchecker M., Hartig T. Space and place - two aspects of the human-landscape relationship. A Changing World - Challenges for Landscape Research. Landscape Series 2007, 47-62. The Netherlands Springer, Dordrecht. F. Kienast, S. Ghosh, O. Wildi (Eds.).
12. Hunziker M., Kienast F. Impacts of changing agricultural activities on scenic beauty: a prototype of an automated rapid assessment technique. Landscape Ecology 1999, 14:161-176.
13. Kaltenborn B., Bjerke T. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 59:1-11.
14. Kaplan R., Kaplan S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Kosela K. Polak i katolik. Spla{ogonek}tana tożsamość 2003, IFiS PAN, Warszawa.
16. Kowicki M. Wieś przyszłości-próba określenia jej kształtu planistyczno-przestrzennego i architektonicznego, [w:] Polska wieś 2025. Wizja rozwoju, praca zbiorowa pod red. J. Wilkina, Wyd. 2005, Fundusz Współpracy, Warszawa.
17. Lamb R., Purcell A.T. Perception of naturalness in landscape and its relationships to vegetation structure. Landscape and Urban Planning 1990, 19:333-352.
18. Midgely M. Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature 1978, Harvester Press, Hassocks, UK.
19. Misgav A. Visual preference of the public for vegetation groups in Israel. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 48:143-159.
20. Moore-Colyer R., Scott A. What kind of landscape do we want? Past, present and future perspectives. Landscape Research 2005, 30:501-523.
21. Pulecka A. Rural landscape planning in Poland - surveyors and landscape architects cooperation. Proceedings FIG Working Week 2004 2003.
22. Pulecka A. Landscape planning. A contribution to the rural land development. Proceedings FIG Working Week 2004 2004.
23. Pulecka A., Kupidura P. Landscape issues in Poland. Economy versus ecology. GIM International. The Global Magazine for Geomatics 2008, 22(6).
24. Raszeja E. Planistyczne instrumenty ochrony i kształtowania krajobrazu na obszarach wiejskich, III Forum Architektury Krajobrazu 2000, Ośrodek Ochrony Zabytkowego Krajobrazu Narodowa Instytucja Kultury, Warszawa.
25. Raszeja E. W poszukiwaniu ładu i autentyczności. Refleksje na temat kształtowania krajobrazu i architektury polskiej wsi, [w:] Polska wieś 2025. Wizja rozwoju, praca zbiorowa pod red. J. Wilkina, Wyd 2005, Fundusz Współpracy, Warszawa.
26. Scott A.J., Bullen J.M. Tapping public perception: studies from Wales. The Cardiff European Landscape Conference 2003 Synopsis of Conference Proceedings 2004.
27. Soliva R., Hunziker M. Beyond the visual dimension: using ideal type narratives to analyse people's assessments of landscape scenarios. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:284-294.
28. Trautsolt S. Geodezyjne urza{ogonek}dzanie terenów rolnych 1985, PolitechnikiWarszawskiej, Warszawa.
29. Ulrich R. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. Behavior and the Natural Environment 1983, 85-125. Plenum Press, New York. A. Altman, J.F. Wohlwill (Eds.).
30. Ulrich R. Human responses to vegetation and landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 1986, 13:26-44.
31. Van Den Berg A., Vlek C., Coeterier J. Group differences in the aesthetic evaluation of nature development plans: a multilevel approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1998, 18:141-157.
32. Woch F. Perspektywy zmian strukturalnych na obszarach wiejskich, w: Kompleksowe scalanie gruntów rolnych i leśnych oraz jego wpływ na środowisko (Woch F. ed.), IUNiG-PIB, materiały szkoleniowe Nr 93, Puławy 2006.
33. Znaniecki F. The Social Role of the Man of Knowledge 1968, Harper & Row, New York.