Quantified self and human movement: A review on the clinical impact of wearable sensing and feedback for gait analysis and intervention

Gait and Posture

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 11-19

  Shull, Pete B ^a   Jirattigalachote, Wisit ^b   Hunt, Michael A ^c   Cutkosky, Mark R ^b   Delp, Scott L ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biofeedback; Gait retraining; Haptic; Motion analysis; Real time feedback

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ANKLE; ELECTRONICS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FOOT; GAIT; GONIOMETER; GYROSCOPE; HEAD INJURY; HEMIPLEGIA; HIP; HUMAN; JOINT STABILITY; KNEE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARKINSON DISEASE; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSOR; SPINE; TACTILE FEEDBACK; THIGH; TRUNK; WALKING;

EID: 84901021122     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: 18792219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.189     Document Type: Review

References (105)

1. Swan M. Sensor Mania! The Internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. J Sens Actuator Netw 2012, 1:217-253.
2. Aizawa K., Tancharoen D., Kawasaki S., Yamasaki T. Efficient retrieval of life log based on context and content. Proc. 1st ACM Work. Contin. Arch. Retr. Pers. Exp. 2004, 22-31. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA.
3. Mann S., Nolan J., Wellman B. Sousveillance: inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments. Surveill Soc 2003, 1:331-355.
4. Morris J.R. Accelerometry - a technique for the measurement of human body movements. J Biomech 1973, 6:729-736.
5. Mosa A.S.M., Yoo I., Sheets L. A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Med Inform Decis Making 2012, 12:1-31.
6. Mayagoitia R.E., Nene A.V., Veltink P.H. Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems. J Biomech 2002, 35:537-542.
7. Roetenberg D., Slycke P.J., Veltink P.H. Ambulatory position and orientation tracking fusing magnetic and inertial sensing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007, 54:883-890.
8. Yang S., Li Q. Inertial sensor-based methods in walking speed estimation: a systematic review. Sensors 2012, 12:6102-6116.
9. Pappas I.P., Popovic M.R., Keller T., Dietz V., Morari M. A reliable gait phase detection system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2001, 9:113-125.
10. Sabatini A.M., Martelloni C., Scapellato S., Cavallo F. Assessment of walking features from foot inertial sensing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005, 52:486-494.
11. Rueterbories J., Spaich E.G., Larsen B., Andersen O.K. Methods for gait event detection and analysis in ambulatory systems. Med Eng Phys 2010, 32:545-552.
12. Takeda R., Tadano S., Todoh M., Morikawa M., Nakayasu M., Yoshinari S., et al. Gait posture estimation using wearable acceleration and gyro sensors. J Biomech 2009, 42:2486-2494.
13. Watanabe T., Saito H., Koike E., Nitta K. A preliminary test of measurement of joint angles and stride length with wireless inertial sensors for wearable gait evaluation system. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011, 2011:975193.
14. Miller N., Jenkins O.C., Kallmann M., Mataric M.J. Motion capture from inertial sensing for untethered humanoid teleoperation. IEEE/RAS Int Conf Hum Robot 2004, 2:547-565.
15. Shull P.B., Shultz R., Silder A., Dragoo J.L., Besier T.F., Cutkosky M.R., et al. Toe-in gait reduces the first peak knee adduction moment in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. J Biomech 2013, 46:122-128.
16. Shull P.B., Lurie K., Cutkosky M.R., Besier T. Training multi-parameter gaits to reduce the knee adduction moment with data-driven models and haptic feedback. J Biomech 2011, 44:1605-1609.
17. Verhoeff L.L., Horlings C.G.C., Janssen L.J.F., Bridenbaugh S.A., Allum J.H.J. Effects of biofeedback on trunk sway during dual tasking in the healthy young and elderly. Gait Posture 2009, 30:76-81.
18. Janssen L.J.F., Verhoeff L.L., Horlings C.G.C., Allum J.H.J. Directional effects of biofeedback on trunk sway during gait tasks in healthy young subjects. Gait Posture 2009, 29:575-581.
19. Dowling A.V., Fisher D.S., Andriacchi T.P. Gait modification via verbal instruction and an active feedback system to reduce peak knee adduction moment. J Biomech Eng 2010, 132:71007-71015.
20. Wheeler J.W., Shull P.B., Besier T. Real-time knee adduction moment feedback for gait retraining through visual and tactile displays. J Biomech Eng 2011, 133:041007.
21. Davis J.R., Carpenter M.G., Tschanz R., Meyes S., Debrunner D., Burger J., et al. Trunk sway reductions in young and older adults using multi-modal biofeedback. Gait Posture 2010, 31:465-472.
22. Yang C.-C., Hsu Y.-L. A review of accelerometry-based wearable motion detectors for physical activity monitoring. Sensors 2010, 10:7772-7788.
23. Drost G., Stegeman D.F., van Engelen B.G.M., Zwarts M.J. Clinical applications of high-density surface EMG: a systematic review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2006, 16:586-602.
24. Tefertiller C., Pharo B., Evans N., Winchester P. Efficacy of rehabilitation robotics for walking training in neurological disorders: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011, 48:387.
25. Strohrmann C., Harms H., Kappeler-setz C., Troster G. Monitoring kinematic changes with fatigue in running using body-worn sensors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012, 16:983-990.
26. Mohamed A.A., Baba J., Beyea J., Landry J., Sexton A., McGibbon C.A. Comparison of strain-gage and fiber-optic goniometry for measuring knee kinematics during activities of daily living and exercise. J Biomech Eng 2012, 134:084502.
27. Kun L., Inoue Y., Shibata K., Enguo C. Ambulatory estimation of knee-joint kinematics in anatomical coordinate system using accelerometers and magnetometers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011, 58:435-442.
28. Djurić-Jovičić M.D., Jovičić N.S., Popović D.B. Kinematics of gait: new method for angle estimation based on accelerometers. Sensors 2011, 11:10571-10585.
29. Salarian A., Burkhard P.R., Vingerhoets J.G., Jolles B.M. A novel approach to reducing number of sensing units for wearable gait analysis systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013, 60:72-77.
30. Rouhani H., Favre J., Crevoisier X., Aminian K. Measurement of multi-segment foot joint angles during gait using a wearable system. J Biomech Eng 2012, 134:061006.
31. Aminian K., Trevisan C., Najafi B., Dejnabadi H., Frigo C., Pavan E., et al. Evaluation of an ambulatory system for gait analysis in hip osteoarthritis and after total hip replacement. Gait Posture 2004, 20:102-107.
32. Zijlstra A., Goosen J.H.M., Verheyen C.C.P.M., Zijlstra W. A body-fixed-sensor based analysis of compensatory trunk movements during unconstrained walking. Gait Posture 2008, 27:164-167.
33. Van der Linden M.L., Rowe P.J., Nutton R.W. Between-day repeatability of knee kinematics during functional tasks recorded using flexible electrogoniometry. Gait Posture 2008, 28:292-296.
34. Dejnabadi H., Jolles B.M., Aminian K. A new approach for quantitative analysis of inter-joint coordination during gait. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008, 55:755-764.
35. Myles C.M., Rowe P.J., Walker C.R.C., Nutton R.W. Knee joint functional range of movement prior to and following total knee arthroplasty measured using flexible electrogoniometry. Gait Posture 2002, 16:46-54.
36. Nutton R.W., van der Linden M.L., Rowe P.J., Gaston P., Wade F.A. A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components. J Bone Joint Surg 2008, 90:37-42.
37. Myles C.M., Rowe P.J., Nutton R.W., Burnett R. The effect of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty on functional range of movement measured by flexible electrogoniometry. Clin Biomech 2006, 21:733-739.
38. Horak F.B., Dozza M., Peterka R., Chiari L., Wall C. Vibrotactile biofeedback improves tandem gait in patients with unilateral vestibular loss. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009, 1164:279-281.
39. Dozza M., Wall C., Peterka R.J., Chiari L., Horak F.B. Effects of practicing tandem gait with and without vibrotactile biofeedback in subjects with unilateral vestibular loss. J Vestib Res 2007, 17:195-204.
40. Hegeman J., Honegger F., Kupper M., Allum J.H.J. The balance control of bilateral peripheral vestibular loss subjects and its improvement with auditory prosthetic feedback. J Vestib Res 2005, 15:109-117.
41. Allum J.H.J., Adkin A.L. Improvements in trunk sway observed for stance and gait tasks during recovery from an acute unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit. Audiol Neuro-Otol 2003, 8:286-302.
42. Nanhoe-Mahabier W., Allum J.H., Pasman E.P., Overeem S., Bloem B.R. The effects of vibrotactile biofeedback training on trunk sway in Parkinson's disease patients. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2012, 18:1017-1021.
43. Bamberg S.J.M., Benbasat A.Y., Scarborough D.M., Krebs D.E., Paradiso J.A. Gait analysis using a shoe-integrated wireless sensor system. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2008, 12:413-423.
44. Adkin A.L., Bloem B.R., Allum J.H.J. Trunk sway measurements during stance and gait tasks in Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture 2005, 22:240-249.
45. Guo Y., Wu D., Liu G., Zhao G., Huang B., Wang L. A low-cost body inertial-sensing network for practical gait discrimination of hemiplegia patients. Telemed J E Health 2012, 18:748-754.
46. Motoi K., Tanaka S., Kuwae Y., Yuji T. Evaluation of a wearable sensor system monitoring posture changes and activities for use in rehabilitation. J Robot Mechatron 2007, 19:656-666.
47. Motoi K., Taniguchi S., Baek M., Morikuni W., Sonoda T., Yuji T., et al. Development of a wearable gait monitoring system for evaluating efficacy of walking training in rehabilitation. Sensors Mater 2012, 24:359-373.
48. Spain R.I., St George R.J., Salarian A., Mancini M., Wagner J.M., Horak F.B., et al. Body-worn motion sensors detect balance and gait deficits in people with multiple sclerosis who have normal walking speed. Gait Posture 2012, 35:573-578.
49. Benedetti M.G., Agostini V., Knaflitz M., Gasparroni V., Boschi M., Piperno R. Self-reported gait unsteadiness in mildly impaired neurological patients: an objective assessment through statistical gait analysis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012, 9:64.
50. Koheil R., Mandel A. Joint position biofeedback facilitation of physical therapy in gait training. Am J Phys Med 1980, 59:288-297.
51. Jolles B.M., Grzesiak A., Eudier A., Dejnabadi H., Voracek C., Pichonnaz C., et al. A randomised controlled clinical trial and gait analysis of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements with a five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 2012, 94:648-655.
52. Favre J., Luthi F., Jolles B.M., Siegrist O., Najafi B., Aminian K. A new ambulatory system for comparative evaluation of the three-dimensional knee kinematics, applied to anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 2006, 14:592-604.
53. Tong K., Granat M.H. A practical gait analysis system using gyroscopes. Med Eng Phys 1999, 21:87-94.
54. Basaglia N., Mazzini N., Boldrini P., Bacciglieri P., Contenti E., Ferraresi G. Biofeedback treatment of genu-recurvatum using an electro goniometric device with an acoustic signal. Scand J Rehabil Med 1989, 21:125-130.
55. Indramohan V.P., Valsan G., Rowe P.J. Development and validation of a user-friendly data logger (SUDALS) for use with flexible electrogoniometers to measure joint movement in clinical trials. J Med Eng Technol 2009, 33:650-655.
56. Bell J.A., Stigant M. Development of a fibre optic goniometer system to measure lumbar and hip movement to detect activities and their lumbar postures. J Med Eng Technol 2007, 31:361-366.
57. Huddleston J., Alaiti A., Goldvasser D., Scarborough D., Freiberg A., Rubash H., et al. Ambulatory measurement of knee motion and physical activity: preliminary evaluation of a smart activity monitor. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006, 3:1-10.
58. Derrick T.R., Dereu D., Mclean S.P. Impacts and kinematic adjustments during an exhaustive run. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2002, 34:998-1002.
59. Liu K., Liu T., Shibata K., Inoue Y., Zheng R. Novel approach to ambulatory assessment of human segmental orientation on a wearable sensor system. J Biomech 2009, 42:2747-2752.
60. Cardon G., De Clercq D., De Bourdeaudhuij I., Breithecker D. Sitting habits in elementary schoolchildren: a traditional versus a moving school. Patient Educ Couns 2004, 54:133-142.
61. Van den Bogert A.J., Read L., Nigg B.M. A method for inverse dynamic analysis using accelerometry. J Biomech 1996, 29:949-954.
62. Willemsen A.M., Frigo C., Boom H.B. Lower extremity angle measurement with accelerometers - error and sensitivity analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991, 38:1186-1193.
63. Willemsen A.M., van Alste J.A., Boom H.B. Real-time gait assessment utilizing a new way of accelerometry. J Biomech 1990, 23:859-863.
64. Wu G., Ladin Z. The kinematometer - an integrated kinematic sensor for kinesiological measurements. J Biomech Eng 1993, 115:53-62.
65. Picerno P., Cereatti A., Cappozzo A. Joint kinematics estimate using wearable inertial and magnetic sensing modules. Gait Posture 2008, 28:588-595.
66. Goulermas J.Y., Findlow A.H., Nester C.J., Liatsis P., Zeng X-J., Kenney L.P.J., et al. An instance-based algorithm with auxiliary similarity information for the estimation of gait kinematics from wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2008, 19:1574-1582.
67. O'Donovan K.J., Kamnik R., O'Keeffe D.T., Lyons G.M. An inertial and magnetic sensor based technique for joint angle measurement. J Biomech 2007, 40:2604-2611.
68. Roetenberg D., Slycke P., Ventevogel A., Veltink P.H. A portable magnetic position and orientation tracker. Sens Actuators A 2007, 135:426-432.
69. Schepers H.M., Koopman H.F.J.M., Veltink P.H. Ambulatory assessment of ankle and foot dynamics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007, 54:895-902.
70. Carmines D.V., Nunley J.A., McElhaney J.H. Effects of ankle taping on the motion and loading pattern of the foot for walking subjects. J Orthop Res 1988, 6:223-229.
71. Isacson J., Gransberg L., Knutsson E. Three-dimensional electrogoniometric gait recording. J Biomech 1986, 19:627-635.
72. Laughman R.K., Carr T.A., Chao E.Y., Youdas J.W., Sim F.H. Three-dimensional kinematics of the taped ankle before and after exercise. Am J Sports Med 1980, 8:425-431.
73. Sands W.A., Hondzinski J.M., Shultz B.B., George G.S. A comparison of subtalar joint maximal eversion while jogging on the minitrampoline and floor. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995, 22:65-72.
74. Takeda R., Tadano S., Todoh M., Morikawa M., Nakayasu M., Yoshinari S. Gait analysis using gravitational acceleration measured by wearable sensors. J Biomech 2009, 42:223-233.
75. Nene A., Mayagoitia R., Veltink P. Assessment of rectus femoris function during initial swing phase. Gait Posture 1999, 9:1-9.
76. Favre J., Jolles B.M., Aissaoui R., Aminian K. Ambulatory measurement of 3D knee joint angle. J Biomech 2008, 41:1029-1035.
77. Kettelkamp D.B., Johnson R.J., Smidt G.L., Chao E.Y., Walker M. An electrogoniometric study of knee motion in normal gait. J Bone Joint Surg 1970, 4:775-790.
78. Strathy G.M., Chao E.Y., Laughman R.K. Changes in knee function associated with treadmill ambulation. J Biomech 1983, 16:517-522.
79. Johnston R.C., Smidt G.L. Measurement of hip-joint motion during walking. J Bone Joint Surg 1969, 6:1083-1094.
80. Zijlstra W., Bisseling R. Estimation of hip abduction moment based on body fixed sensors. Clin Biomech 2004, 19:819-827.
81. Findlow A., Goulermas J.Y., Nester C., Howard D., Kenney L.P.J. Predicting lower limb joint kinematics using wearable motion sensors. Gait Posture 2008, 28:120-126.
82. Wu G., Ladin Z. The study of kinematic transients in locomotion using the integrated kinematic sensor. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1996, 4:193-200.
83. Dejnabadi H., Jolles B.M., Casanova E., Fua P., Aminian K. Estimation and visualization of sagittal kinematics of lower limbs orientation using body-fixed sensors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006, 53:1385-1393.
84. Simcox S., Parker S., Davis G.M., Smith R.W., Middleton J.W. Performance of orientation sensors for use with a functional electrical stimulation mobility system. J Biomech 2005, 38:1185-1190.
85. Dejnabadi H., Jolles B.M., Aminian K. A new approach to accurate measurement of uniaxial joint angles based on a combination of accelerometers and gyroscopes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005, 52:1478-1484.
86. Wall C., Wrisley D.M., Statler K.D. Vibrotactile tilt feedback improves dynamic gait index: a fall risk indicator in older adults. Gait Posture 2009, 30:16-21.
87. Feipel V., De Mesmaeker T., Klein P., Rooze M. Three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbar spine during treadmill walking at different speeds. Eur Spine J 2001, 10:16-22.
88. Reininga I.H.F., Stevens M., Wagenmakers R., Boerboom A.L., Groothoff J.W., Bulstra S.K., et al. Comparison of gait in patients following a computer-navigated minimally invasive anterior approach and a conventional posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Res 2013, 31:288-294.
89. Lurie K.L., Shull P.B., Nesbitt K.F., Cutkosky M.R. Informing haptic feedback design for gait retraining. IEEE World Haptics 2011, 19-24.
90. Shull P.B., Silder A., Shultz R., Dragoo J.L., Besier T.F., Delp S.L., et al. Six-week gait retraining program reduces knee adduction moment, reduces pain, and improves function for individuals with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 2013, 31:1020-1025.
91. Miyazaki T., Wada M., Kawahara H. Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2002, 61:617-622.
92. Riskowski J.L., Mikesky A.E., Bahamonde R.E., Burr D.B. Design and validation of a knee brace with feedback to reduce the rate of loading. J Biomech Eng 2009, 131:84503-84506.
93. Barrios J.A., Crossley K.M., Davis I.S. Gait retraining to reduce the knee adduction moment through real-time visual feedback of dynamic knee alignment. J Biomech 2010, 43:2208-2213.
94. Hunt M.A., Simic M., Hinman R.S., Bennell K.L., Wrigley T.V. Feasibility of a gait retraining strategy for reducing knee joint loading: increased trunk lean guided by real-time biofeedback. J Biomech 2011, 44:943-947.
95. Crowell H.P., Davis I.S. Gait retraining to reduce lower extremity loading in runners. Clin Biomech 2011, 26:78-83.
96. White S., Lifeso R. Altering asymmetric limb loading after hip arthroplasty using real-time dynamic feedback when walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86:1958-1963.
97. Simic M., Hunt M.A., Bennell K.L., Hinman R.S., Wrigley T.V. Trunk lean gait modification and knee joint load in people with medial knee osteoarthritis: the effect of varying trunk lean angles. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012, 64:1545-1553.
98. Vuillerme N., Cuisinier R. Head position-based electrotactile tongue biofeedback affects postural responses to Achilles tendon vibration in humans. Exp Brain Res 2008, 186:503-508.
99. Tate J.J., Milner C.E. Real-time kinematic, temporospatial, and kinetic biofeedback during gait retraining in patients: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2010, 90:1123-1134.
100. Beurskens R., Bock O. Age-related deficits of dual-task walking: a review. Neural Plast 2012, 2012:131608.
101. Haggerty S., Jiang L-T., Galecki A., Sienko K.H. Effects of biofeedback on secondary-task response time and postural stability in older adults. Gait Posture 2012, 35:523-528.
102. Bechly K.E., Carender W.J., Myles J.D., Sienko K.H. Determining the preferred modality for real-time biofeedback during balance training. Gait Posture 2013, 37:391-396.
103. Lee I., Choi S. Effects of multi-modal guidance for the acquisition of sight reading skills: a case study with simple drum sequences. IEEE World Haptics 2013, 571-576.
104. Spelmezan D., Jacobs M., Hilgers A., Borchers J. Tactile motion instructions for physical activities. Conference on Human Factors in Computing System 2009, 224-252.
105. Dowling A.V., Favre J., Andriacchi T.P. Inertial sensor-based feedback can reduce key risk metrics for anterior cruciate ligament injury during jump landings. Am J Sports Med 2012, 40:1075-1083.