Technology policy and climate change

Climate Change Economics

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Jaffe, Adam B ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

innovation; research funding; Technology policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900992333     PISSN: 20100078     EISSN: 20100086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S201000781250025X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Cockburn, I, S Stern and J Zausner (2011). Finding the endless frontier: Lessons from the Life Sciences Innovation System for Energy R&D. In Accelerating Energy Innovation: Insights from Multiple Sectors, Henderson and Newell (eds.), pp. 113-158. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Cohen, LR and RG Noll (1991). The Technology Pork Barrel, Washington: Brookings Press.
3. Dosi, G and RR Nelson (2010). Technological change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation Volume 1, Hall and Rosenberg (eds.), pp. 51-127. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4. Goolsbee, A (1998). Does government R&D policy mainly benefit scientists and engineers? American Economic Review 88(2), 298-302.
5. Goulder, LH and SH Schneider (1999). Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies, Resource and Energy Economics, 21, 211-253.
6. Griliches, Z (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics. Vol. 94 1992 Supplement, 29-47.
7. Grimaud, A and G Lafforgue (2008). Climate change mitigation policies: Are R&D subsidies preferable to a carbon tax? Revue d Economie Politique, 118(6), 915-940.
8. Hall, BH and J Lerner (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation Volume I, Hall and Rosenberg (eds.), pp. 609-639. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9. Jaffe, AB (1998). The importance of "spillovers" in the policy mission of the advanced technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 23(2), 11-19.
10. Jaffe, AB (2002). Building programme evaluation into the design of public research-support programmes. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 22-34.
11. Lichtenberg, F (1988). The private R and D investment response to federal design and technical competitions. American Economic Review, 78(3), 550-559.
12. Mansfield, E, J Rapoport, A Romeo, S Wagner and C Beardsley (1977). Social and private rates of return from industrial innovations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77, 221-240.
13. Mowery, DC (2011). Federal policy and the development of semiconductors, computer hardware, and computer software: A policy model for climate-change R&D? In Accelerating Energy Innovation: Insights from Multiple Sectors, Henderson and Newell (eds.), pp. 159-188. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Popp, D (2006). Comparison of climate policies in the ENTICE-BR model. Energy Journal, Special Issue, 1, 163-174.
15. Popp, D, R Newell and A Jaffe (2010). Energy, the environment, and technological change. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation Volume II, Hall and Rosenberg (eds.), pp. 873-937. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
16. Thompson, P (2010). Learning by doing. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation Volume I, Hall and Rosenberg (eds.), pp. 429-476. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
17. Von Hippel, E (2010). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation Volume I, Hall and Rosenberg (eds), pp. 411-427. Amsterdam Elsevier.
18. Wilbanks, TJ (2011). Inducing transformational energy technological change. Energy Economics, 33(4), 699-708.