Barriers and facilitators to evidence-use in program management: A systematic review of the literature

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Humphries, Serena ^a   Stafinski, Tania ^a   Mumtaz, Zubia ^a   Menon, Devidas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Barriers; Decision making; Evidence use; Facilitators; Program management

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH FACILITY ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 84900861904     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-171     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hibberd JM, Smith DL, Nursing Leadership and Management in Canada Canada: Elsevier 3 2006
2. Building knowledge integration systems for evidence-informed decisions. Best A, Terpstra JL, Moor G, Riley B, Norman CD, Glasgow RE, J Organ Manag 2009 23 627 641
3. An organizational science perspective on information, knowledge, evidence, and organizational decision-making. Baker GR, Ginsberg L, Langley A, Using Knowledge and Evidence in Health Care: Multidisciplinary Approaches Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, Champagne F, 2004 95 123
4. Evidence-based management: From theory to practice in health care. Walshe K, Rundall TG, Milbank Q 2001 79 429 457 10.1111/1468-0009.00214 11565163 (Pubitemid 33632719)
5. Clements D, What counts? Interpreting evidence-based decision-making for management and policy. Report of the 6th CHSRF Annual Invitational Workshop, Vancouver, British Columbia: March 11. 2004 Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF) 2004 Available: http://www.cfhi-fcass.ca/migrated/ pdf/event-reports/2004-workshop-report-e.pdf
6. Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision-making. Straus SE, Tetroe JM, Graham ID, J Clin Epidemiol 2011 64 6 10 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.016 19926445
7. The knowledge-to-action cycle: Identifying the gaps. Kitson A, Straus SE, Can Med Assoc J 2010 182 73 E77 10.1503/cmaj.081231
8. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 2011: The Cochrane Collaboration, Higgins JP, Green S, Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. [n.s.]. 2011 Available: http://www.cochrane.org/handbook
9. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, Health services research and.evidence-based decision-making Ottawa. ON: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation 2000
10. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, Britten N, Roen K, Duffy S, Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a product from the ESRC methods programme Lancaster (UK): Lancaster University 2006 Available: http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/shm/research/nssr/ research/dissemination/publications/NS-Synthesis-Guidance-v1.pdf
11. Pluye P, Robert E, Cargo M, Bartlett G, O'Cathain A, Griffiths F, Boardman F, Gagnon MP, Rousseau MC, Proposal: a mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews Montreal: McGill University, Department of Family Medicine Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2011. 2011 Available: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/f/ MMAT%202011%20criteria%20and%20tutorial%202011-06-29.pdf
12. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ, Shaw RL, Smith JA, Young B, Qual Res 2006 6 27 44 10.1177/1468794106058867 (Pubitemid 43650772)
13. Synthesizing Qualitative Research, Synthesizing Qualitative Research Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2012
14. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group, PLoS Med 2009 6 1000097 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 19621072
15. Information transfer: what do decision makers want and need from researchers? Dobbins M, Rosenbaum P, Plews N, Law M, Fysh A, Implement Sci 2007 2 20 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1929120/#-ffn- sectitle 10.1186/1748-5908-2-20 17608940
16. Health care management: models for evidence-based practice. Farmer J, Chesson R, J Manag Med 2001 15 266 282 10.1108/02689230110403777 11765312
17. "It's a feel. that's what a lot of our evidence would consist of": public health practitioners' perspectives on evidence. Higgins JW, Strange K, Scarr J, Pennock M, Barr V, Yew A, Drummond J, Terpstra J, Eval Health Prof 2011 34 278 296 10.1177/0163278710393954 21224264
18. Evidence-based priority-setting: what do the decision-makers think? Mitton C, Patten S, J Health Serv Res Policy 2004 9 146 152 10.1258/ 1355819041403240 15272972 (Pubitemid 38954935)
19. Barriers to evidence-based decision making among Polish health care managers. Niedzwiedzka BM, Health Serv Manage Res 2003 16 106 115 10.1258/095148403321591429 12803950 (Pubitemid 36596493)
20. Using evidence in the development of local health policies. Some evidence from the United Kingdom. Weatherly H, Drummond M, Smith D, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002 18 771 781 12602078 (Pubitemid 36125883)
21. Community capacity to acquire, assess, adapt, and apply research evidence: a survey of Ontario's HIV/AIDS sector. Wilson MG, Rourke SB, Lavis JN, Bacon J, Travers R, Impl Sci 2011 6 54 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC3123230/ 10.1186/1748-5908-6-54
22. More than "using research": the real challenges in promoting evidence-informed decision-making. Bowen S, Erickson T, Martens PJ, Crockett S, Healthc Policy 2009 4 87 102 19377360
23. Evidence-based administrative decision making and the Ontario hospital CEO: information needs, seeking behaviour, and access to sources. McDiarmid M, Kendall S, Binns M, JCHLA 2007 28 63 72 10.5596/c07-019
24. Factors of the innovation, organization, environment, and individual that predict the influence five systematic reviews had on public health decisions. Dobbins M, Cockerill R, Barnsley J, Ciliska D, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001 17 467 478 11758291 (Pubitemid 33108641)
25. Redesigning work processes in health care: lessons from the National Health Service. Ham C, Kipping R, McLeod H, Milbank Q 2003 81 415 439 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-3-00062 12941002 (Pubitemid 37346998)
26. Public health decision-makers' informational needs and preferences for receiving research evidence. Dobbins M, Jack S, Thomas H, Kothari A, Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2007 4 156 163 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00089.x 17850496 (Pubitemid 47390277)
27. The extent and organizational determinants of research utilization in Canadian health services organizations. Belkhodja O, Amara N, Landry R, Ouimet M, Sci Commun 2007 28 377 417 10.1177/1075547006298486
28. Research-based-decision-making in Canadian health organizations: A behavioural approach. Jbilou J, Amara N, Landry R, J Med Syst 2007 31 185 196 10.1007/s10916-007-9054-3 17622021 (Pubitemid 46992009)
29. Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: an integrative review. Solomons NM, Spross JA, J Nurs Manag 2011 19 109 120 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01144.x 21223411
30. Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A, J Health Serv Res Policy 2002 7 239 244 10.1258/135581902320432778 12425783
31. The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review. Orton L, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson D, O'Flaherty M, Capewell S, PLoS One 2011 6 21704 10.1371/journal.pone.0021704 21818262
32. Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature. Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten S, Perry BW, Milbank Q 2007 85 729 768 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x 18070335
33. Integrated health systems and integrated knowledge: Creating space for putting knowledge into action. Scott C, Seidel J, Bowen S, Gall N, Health Care Q 2009 13 30 36
34. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Milbank Q 2004 82 239 244