Countering counteradaptations: Males hijack control of female kicking behavior

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 470-476

  Wilson, Carly J ^a   Tomkins, Joseph L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Callosobruchus maculatus; Counteradaptation; Female kicking; Female resistance; Sexual conflict; Sexually antagonistic coevolution

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANTAGONISM; BEETLE; COEVOLUTION; COPULATION; MORTALITY; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

EID: 84900860368     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/aru022     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2002. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature. 415:787
2. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press
3. Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol. 18:41-47
4. Chapman T, Partridge L. 1996. Sexual conflict as fuel for evolution. Nature. 381:189-190
5. Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA. 1995. Sexual coercion in animal societies. Anim Behav. 49:1345-1365
6. Crudgington H, Siva-Jothy MT. 2000. Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature. 407:855-856
7. Eady PE. 1991. Sperm competition in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): A comparison of two methods used to estimate paternity. Ecol Entomol. 16:45-53
8. Eady PE, Brown DV. 2000. Spermatophore size and mate fecundity in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Ethol Ecol Evol. 12:203-207
9. Eady PE, Hamilton L, Lyons RE. 2007. Copulation, genital damage and early death in Callosobruchus maculatus. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 274:247-252
10. Edvardsson M. 2007. Female Callosobruchus maculatus mate when they are thirsty: Resource-rich ejaculates as mating effort in a beetle. Anim Behav. 74:183-188
11. Edvardsson M, Canal D. 2006. The effects of copulation Duration in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Behav Ecol. 17:430-434
12. Edvardsson M, Tregenza T. 2005. Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus harm their mates?. Behav Ecol. 16:788-793
13. Fox CW, Reed DH. 2011. Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: An experimental study and meta-Analysis. Evolution. 65:246-258
14. García-González F, Simmons LW. 2007. Paternal indirect genetic effects on offspring viability and the benefits of polyandry. Curr Biol. 17:32-36
15. Gasparini C, Evans JP. 2013. Ovarian fluid mediates the temporal decline in sperm viability in a fish with sperm storage. PLoS One. 8:e64431
16. Gay L, Brown E, Tregenza T, Pincheira-Donoso D, Eady PE, Vasudev R, Hunt J, Hosken DJ. 2011. The genetic architecture of sexual conflict: Male harm and female resistance in Callosobruchus maculatus. J Evol Biol. 24:449-456
17. Gay L, Eady PE, Vasudev RAM, Hosken DJ, Tregenza T. 2009. Costly sexual harassment in a beetle. Physiol Entomol. 34:86-92
18. Gay L, Hosken DJ, Eady P, Vasudev R, Tregenza T. 2011. The evolution of harm-effect of sexual conflicts and population size. Evolution. 65:725-737
19. Gillott C. 2003. Male accessory gland secretions: Modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. Annu Rev Entomol. 48:163
20. den Hollander M, Gwynne DT. 2009. Female fitness consequences of male harassment and copulation in seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus. Anim Behav. 78:1061-1070
21. Hosken DJ, Price TAR. 2009. Genital evolution: The traumas of sex. Curr Biol. 19:R519-R521
22. Hosken DJ, Stockley P. 2004. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 19:87-93
23. Hotzy C, Arnqvist G. 2009. Sperm competition favors harmful males in seed beetles. Curr Biol. 19:404-407
24. Hotzy C, Polak M, Rönn JL, Arnqvist G. 2012. Phenotypic engineering unveils the function of genital morphology. Curr Biol. 22:2258-2261
25. Johnstone RA, Keller L. 2000. How males can gain by harming their mates: Sexual conflict, seminal toxins, and the cost of mating. Am Nat. 156:368-377
26. Lessells CM. 2005. Why are males bad for females?. Models for the evolution of damaging male mating behavior. Am Nat. 165:S46-S63
27. Morrow EH, Arnqvist G, Pitnick S. 2003. Adaptation versus pleiotropy: Why do males harm their mates?. Behav Ecol. 14:802-806
28. Parker GA. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum MS, Blum NA, editors. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. New York: Academic Press. p. 123-166
29. Perry JC, Sirot L, Wigby S. 2012. The seminal symphony: How to compose an ejaculate. Trends Ecol Evol. doi: Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tree.2013.03.005
30. Qi Y, Burkholder WE. 1982. Sex pheromone biology and behavior of the cowpea weevil Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J Chem Ecol. 8:527-534
31. Rice WR. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature. 381:232-234
32. Rönn JL, Hotzy C. 2012. Do longer genital spines in male seed beetles function as better anchors during mating?. Anim Behav. 83:75-79
33. Rönn JL, Katvala M, Arnqvist G. 2007. Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:10921-10925
34. Savalli UM, Fox CW. 1998. Genetic variation in paternal investment in a seed beetle. Anim Behav. 56:953-961
35. Savalli UM, Fox CW. 1999a. The effect of male mating history on paternal investment, fecundity and female remating in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Funct Ecol. 13:169-177
36. Savalli UM, Fox CW. 1999b. The effect of male size, age, and mating behavior on sexual selection in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Ethol Ecol Evol. 11:49-60
37. Simmons LW. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press
38. South A, Lewis SM. 2011. The influence of male ejaculate quantity on female fitness: A meta-Analysis. Biol Rev. 86:299-309
39. Yamane T, Miyatake T. 2010. Induction of oviposition by injection of male-derived extracts in two Callosobruchus species. J Insect Physiol. 56:1783-1788
40. Yamane T, Miyatake T, Kimura Y. 2008. Female mating receptivity after injection of male-derived extracts in Callosobruchus maculatus. J Insect Physiol. 54:1522-1527.