How involved are they really? A comparative network analysis of the institutional drivers of local actor inclusion

Land Use Policy

Volumn 39, Issue , 2014, Pages 376-387

  Ingold, Karin ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Collaborative policy networks; Land use change; Local communities; Mountain regions; Social network analysis

Indexed keywords

BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; MOUNTAIN REGION; NETWORK ANALYSIS; POLICY APPROACH; SOCIAL NETWORK; STAKEHOLDER;

SWEDEN;

EID: 84900837826     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bauer M. The German Länder and the European constitutional treaty: heading for a differentiated theory of regional elite preferences for European integration. Regional and Federal Studies 2006, 16(1):21-41.
2. Beniston M. Climatic Change and Its Impacts - An Overview Focusing on Switzerland 2004, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordecht/Boston/London.
3. Bernauer Th., Gampfer R. Effects of civil society involvement on popular legitimacy of global environmental governance. Global Environmental Change 2013, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.01.001.
4. Bodin Ö., Crona B.I. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference. Global Environmental Change 2009, 19:366-374.
5. Bonacich Ph. Power and centrality: a family of measures. American Journal of Sociology 1987, 92:1170-1182.
6. Bolleyer N., Börzel T. Non-hierarchical policy coordination in multilevel systems. European Political Science Review 2010, 2(2):157-185.
7. Bosco F.J. Actor-network theory, networks, and relational approaches in human geography. Approaches to Human Geography 2006, 136-146. Sage, London. S. Aitken, G. Valentine (Eds.).
8. Bottazzi P., Dao H. On the road through the Bolivian Amazon: a multi-level land governance analysis of deforestation. Land Use Policy 2013, 30(1):137-146.
9. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Freeman L.C. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis 2002, Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA.
10. Crona B.I., Bodin Ö. WHAT you know is WHO you know? Communication patterns among resource extractors as a prerequisite for co-management. Ecology and Society 2006, 11:32.
11. Diem S.L. Design Matters: The Relationship Between Policy Design, Context, and Implementation in Integration Plans Based on Voluntary Choice and Socioeconomic Status 2010, (PhD Thesis), The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, 292 pp.
12. Dilling L., Romsdahl R. Promoting adaptation success in natural resource management through decision support: lessons from the great plains and rocky mountain regions. Successful Adaptation to Climate Change 2013, Routledge, London. S. Moser, M. Boykoff (Eds.).
13. Eckerberg K., Joas M. Multi-level environmental governance: a concept under stress?. Local Environment 2004, 9(5):405-412.
14. Freeman L.C. Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1979, 1:215-239.
15. Research Methods in Social Network Analysis 1989, George Mason University Press, Fairfax, VA. L.C. Freeman, D.R. White, A.K. Rommey (Eds.).
16. FOEN Pärke von nationaler Bedeutung: Produktelabel. Richtlinie zur Verleihung und Verwendung des Produktelabels 2009, Federal Office for the Environment, Bern, CH.
17. Glasbergen P. Global action networks: agents for collective action. Global Environmental Change 2010, 20(1):130-141.
18. Granovetter M. The sociological and economic approaches to labor market analysis: a social structure view. The Sociology of Economic Life 1992, West View Press, Boulder. M. Granovetter, R. Swedberg (Eds.).
19. Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 1985, 91(3):481-510.
20. Grewal R., Lilien G.L., Mallapragada G. Location, location, location: how network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Science 2006, 52(7):1043-1056.
21. Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from?. American Journal of Sociology 1999, 104(5):1439-1493.
22. Hanneman R.A., Riddle M. Introduction to Social Network Methods 2005, University of California, Riverside.
23. Hirschi Ch. Strengthening regional cohesion: collaborative networks and sustainable development in Swiss rural areas. Ecology and Society 2010, 15(4):16.
24. Hooghe L., Marks G. Unraveling the central stat, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review 2003, 97(2):223-243.
25. Ingold K. How to Create and Preserve Social Capital in Climate Adaptation Policies: A Network Approach 2013, (forthcoming).
26. Ingold K. Network structures within policy processes: coalitions, power, and brokerage in Swiss climate policy. Policy Studies Journal 2011, 39(3):435-459.
27. Ingold K., Balsiger J. Sustainability principles put into practice: perceptions and networks in Swiss climate change adaptation. Regional Environmental Change 2014, (forthcoming).
28. Ingold K., Balsiger J., Hirschi Ch. Climate change in mountain regions: how local communities adapt to extreme events. Local Environment 2010, 15(7):651-661.
29. IPCC Summary for Policymakers, Contribution of Working Group I 2007, Available from: www.ipcc.ch.
30. Kampmann D., Lüscher A., Konold W., Herzog F. Agri-environment scheme protects diversity of mountain grassland species. Land Use Policy 2012, 29(3):569-576.
31. Khailani D.K., Perera R. Mainstreaming disaster resilience attributes in local development plans for the adaptation to climate change induced flooding: a study based on the local plan of Shah Alam City, Malaysia. Land Use Policy 2013, 30(1):615-627.
32. Knill Ch, Lenschow A. Coping with Europe: the impact of British and German administrations on the implementation of EU environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy 1998, 5(4):595-614.
33. Knoke D., Pappi F.U., Broadbent J., Tsujinaka Y. Comparing Policy Networks - Labour Politics in the US, Germany and Japan 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
34. Knoepfel P., Nahrath S., Savary J., Varone F. Analyse des politiques publiques de l'environnement 2009, Rüegger, Zürich/Chur.
35. Kriesi H.-P. Entscheidungsstrukturen und Entscheidungsprozesse in der Schweizer Politik 1980, Campus, Frankfurt.
36. Lijphart.A. Patterns of Democracy 1999, Yale University Press, New Haven.
37. Liefferink D., Wiering M., Uitenboogaart Y. The EU water framework directive: a multi-dimensional analysis of implementation and domestic impact. Land Use Policy 2011, 28(4):712-722.
38. Lienert J., Schnetzer F., Ingold K. Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management 2013, 125:134-148.
39. Lubell M., Fulton A. Local policy networks and agricultural watershed management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2007, 18(4):673-696.
40. Majone G. Regulating Europe 2001, Routledge, London/New York.
41. March J.G., Olsen J.P. Institutional perspectives on political institutions. Governance 1996, 9(3):247-264.
42. Marìn A., Gelcich S., Castilla J.C., Berkes F. Exploring social capital in Chile's coastal benthic comanagement system using a network approach. Ecology and Society 2012, 17(1):13.
43. Muñoz-Erickson T., Cutts B.B., Larson E.K., Darby K.J., Neff M., Wutich A., Bolin B. Spanning boundaries in an Arizona watershed partnership: information networks and tools for entrenchment or ties for collaboration?. Ecology and Society 2010, 15(3):22.
44. Newig J., Günther D., Pahl-Wostl C. Synapses in the network: learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecology and Society 2010, 15(4):24.
45. OcCC Das Klima ändert sich - was nun? Der neue UN Klimabericht (IPCCC 2007) und die wichtigsten Ergebnisse aus Sicht der Schweiz 2008, OcCC, Bern.
46. OcCC Klimaänderung und die Schweiz 2050. Erwartete Auswirkungen auf Umwelt, Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft 2007, OcCC, Bern.
47. Ostrom E. A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF 2014, 15(1):71-108.
48. Ostrom E. Understanding Institutional Diversity 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
49. Ostrom E. Constituting social capital and collective action. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1994, 6:527-562.
50. Prell C., Hubacek K., Reed M. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 2007, 22(6):501-518.
51. Rauschmayer F., Wittmer H. Evaluating deliberative and analytical methods for the resolution of environmental conflicts. Land Use Policy 2006, 23(1):108-122.
52. Schneider M., Scholz J., Lubell M., Mindruta D., Edwardsen M. Building consensual institutions: networks and the national estuary program. American Journal of Political Science 2003, 47(1):143-158.
53. Scott J. Social Network Analysis 2000, Sage, London.
54. Smith T.M., Fischlein M. Rival private governance networks: competing to define the rules of sustainability performance. Global Environmental Change 2010, 20:511-522.
55. Stenseke M. Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: lessons from Sweden. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(2):214-223.
56. Wang J. Localising public diplomacy: the role of sub-national actors in nation branding. Place Branding 2006, 2:32-42. 10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990043.
57. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
58. The role of regions and sub-national actors in Europe. Essays in European Law 2005, Hard Publishing, Oxford. S. Weatherill, U. Bernitz (Eds.).
59. Weiss K., Hamann M., Kinney M., Marsh H. Knowledge exchange and policy influence in a marine resource governance network. Global Environmental Change 2012, 22(1):178-188.
60. Yang Y.-C.E., Lin Y.-F.F. A new GIScience application for visualized natural resources management and decision support. Transactions in GIS 2011, 15:109-124. 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2011.01267.x.