Similarities in error processing establish a link between saccade prediction at baseline and adaptation performance

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 111, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 2084-2093

  Wong, Aaron L ^a   Shelhamer, Mark ^a,b  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Error correction mechanism; Predictive saccades; Saccades

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; ERROR CORRECTION PROCESS; FEMALE; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; LEARNING; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTOR ADAPTATION; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; BIOMECHANICS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OCULOGRAPHY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SACCADES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84900832164     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00779.2013     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Beran J. Statistics for Long-Memory Processes. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1994.
2. Box GE, Jenkins GM. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Oakland, CA: Holden-Day, 1970.
3. Brockwell PJ, Davis RA. Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting. New York: Springer, 2002.
4. Catz N, Dicke PW, Thier P. Cerebellar-dependent motor learning is based on pruning a Purkinje cell population response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 7309-7314, 2008.
5. Cheng S, Sabes PN. Modeling sensorimotor learning with linear dynamical systems. Neural Comput 18: 760-793, 2006.
6. Collins T, Wallman J. The relative importance of retinal error and prediction in saccadic adaptation. J Neurophysiol 107: 3342-3348, 2012.
7. Crevecoeur F, Bollens B, Detrembleur C, Lejeune TM. Towards a "goldstandard" approach to address the presence of long-range auto-correlation in physiological time series. J Neurosci Methods 192: 163-172, 2010.
8. Drew PJ, Abbott LF. Models and properties of power-law adaptation in neural systems. J Neurophysiol 96: 826-833, 2006.
9. Golla H, Tziridis K, Haarmeier T, Catz N, Barash S, Thier P. Reduced saccadic resilience and impaired saccadic adaptation due to cerebellar disease. Eur J Neurosci 27: 132-144, 2008.
10. Granger CW. Long memory relationships and the aggregation of dynamic models. J Econometrics 14: 227-238, 1980.
11. Haith AM, Krakauer JW. Model-based and model-free mechanisms of human motor learning. Adv Exp Med Biol 782: 1-21, 2013.
12. Huang VS, Haith A, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models. Neuron 70: 787-801, 2011.
13. Joiner WM, Shelhamer M. An internal clock generates repetitive predictive saccades. Exp Brain Res 175: 305-320, 2006a.
14. Joiner WM, Shelhamer M. Responses to noisy periodic stimuli reveal properties of a neural predictor. J Neurophysiol 96: 2121-2126, 2006b.
15. Joiner WM, Shelhamer M. A model of time estimation and error feedback in predictive timing behavior. J Comput Neurosci 26: 119-138, 2009.
16. Kailath T. Lectures on Wiener and Kalman Filtering. New York: Springer, 1981.
17. Kojima Y, Iwamoto Y, Yoshida K. Memory of learning facilitates saccadic adaptation in the monkey. J Neurosci 24: 7531-7539, 2004.
18. Kording K, Tenenbaum JB, Shadmehr R. Multiple timescales and uncertainty in motor adaptation. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2006: 745-752, 2006.
19. Leigh RJ, Zee DS. The Neurology of Eye Movements. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2006.
20. Lowen SB, Teich MC. Fractal-Based Point Processes. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2005.
21. Matin E. Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. Psychol Bull 81: 899-917, 1974.
22. Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci 26: 3642-3645, 2006.
23. McLaughlin SC. Parametric adjustment in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys 2: 359-362, 1967.
24. Miall RC, Wolpert DM. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9: 1265-1279, 1996.
25. Miller JM, Anstis T, Templeton WB. Saccadic plasticity: parametric adaptive control by retinal feedback. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 7: 356-366, 1981.
26. Morariu VV, Buimaga-Iarinca L, Vamos C, Soltuz SM. Detrended fluctuation analysis of autoregressive processes. Fluct Noise Lett 7: L249-L255, 2007.
27. Papoulis A. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984.
28. Peng CK, Buldyrev SV, Havlin S, Simons M, Stanley HE, Goldberger AL. Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 49: 1685-1689, 1994.
29. Prsa M, Thier P. The role of the cerebellum in saccadic adaptation as a window into neural mechanisms of motor learning. Eur J Neurosci 33: 2114-2128, 2011.
30. Rangarajan G, Ding M. Integrated approach to the assessment of long range correlation in time series data. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 61: 4991-5001, 2000.
31. Robinson DA. A method of measuring eye movement using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 10: 137-145, 1963.
32. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R. Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4: e179, 2006.
33. Stadnitski T. Measuring fractality. Front Physiol 3: 127, 2012.
34. Stark L, Young LR, Vossius G. Predictive control of eye tracking movements. IRE Trans Hum Factors Electron HFE-3: 52-57, 1962.
35. Stephen DG, Anastas J. Fractal fluctuations in gaze speed visual search. Atten Percept Psychophys 73: 666-677, 2011.
36. Straube A, Deubel H. Rapid gain adaptation affects the dynamics of saccadic eye movements in humans. Vision Res 35: 3451-3458, 1995.
37. Tseng YW, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol 98: 54-62, 2007.
38. van Beers RJ. Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise. Neuron 63: 406-417, 2009.
39. van Beers RJ, Brenner E, Smeets JB. Random walk of motor planning in task-irrelevant dimensions. J Neurophysiol 109: 969-977, 2013.
40. Wagenmakers EJ, Farrell S, Ratcliff R. Estimation and interpretation of 1/f alpha noise in human cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 11: 579-615, 2004.
41. Wei K, Kording K. Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? J Neurophysiol 101: 655-664, 2009.
42. West BJ, Deering W. Fractal physiology for physicists: Levy statistics. Phys Rep 246: 1-100, 1994.
43. Wong AL, Shelhamer M. Exploring the fundamental dynamics of error-based motor learning using a stationary predictive-saccade task. PLoS One 6: e25225, 2011a.
44. Wong AL, Shelhamer M. Sensorimotor adaptation error signals are derived from realistic predictions of movement outcomes. J Neurophysiol 105: 1130-1140, 2011b.
45. Wong AL, Shelhamer M. Using prediction errors to drive saccade adaptation: the implicit double-step task. Exp Brain Res 222: 55-64, 2012.
46. Wu HG, Miyamoto YR, Castro LN, Olveczky BP, Smith MA. Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability. Nat Neurosci 17: 312-321, 2014.
47. Zarahn E, Weston GD, Liang J, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. Explaining savings for visuomotor adaptation: linear time-invariant state-space models are not sufficient. J Neurophysiol 100: 2537-2548, 2008.
48. Zuber BL, Stark L. Saccadic suppression: elevation of visual threshold associated with saccadic eye movements. Exp Neurol 16: 65-79, 1966.