Local consumption and territorial based accounting for CO2 emissions

Ecological Economics

Volumn 104, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-11

  Hermannsson, Kristinn ^a   McIntyre, Stuart G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

City region; Environmental accounting; H73; Metropolitan area; Q56; R12; R15; Regional interdependency

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; METROPOLITAN AREA; TERRITORIAL MANAGEMENT;

GLASGOW [SCOTLAND]; SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84900829449     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.020     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Akita T., Kataoka M. Interregional interdependence and regional economic growth: an interregional input-output analysis of the Kyushu region. Rev. Urban Reg. Dev. Stud. 2002, 14(1):18-40.
2. Andrew R., Peters G., Lennox J. Approximation and regional aggregation in multi-regional input-output analysis for national carbon footprint accounting. Econ. Syst. Res. 2009, 21(3):311-335.
3. Dhakal S. GHG emissions from urbanization and opportunities for urban carbon mitigation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2010, 2(4):277-283.
4. Dodman D. Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environ. Urban. 2009, 21(1):185-201.
5. Druckman A., Jackson T. The carbon footprint of UK households 1990-2004: a socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input-output model. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68(7):2066-2077.
6. Energy and Climate Change Committee Consumption-based Emissions Reporting. Technical Report 2012, House of Commons.
7. Eskelinen H. Core and periphery in a three-region input-output framework. Ann. Reg. Sci. 1983, 17(3):41-56.
8. Flegg A., Tohmo T. Regional input-output tables and the FLQ formula: a case study of Finland. Reg. Stud. 2013, 47(5):703-721.
9. Flegg A., Webber C. On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input-output tables: reply. Reg. Stud. 1997, 31(8):795-805.
10. Fleming A.D. Scotland's Census 2001 Statistics on Travel to Work or Study. General Register Office for Scotland. Occasional Paper No. 12 2006.
11. Glaeser E., Kahn M. The greenness of cities: carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. J. Urban Econ. 2010, 67(3):404-418.
12. Harris R., Liu A. Input-output modelling of the urban and regional economy: the importance of external trade. Reg. Stud. 1998, 32(9):851-862.
13. Hermannsson K. Beyond intermediates: the role of consumption and commuting in the construction of local input-output tables. Strathclyde Discussion Papers in Economics 2013, 13(05). (http://www.strath.ac.uk/media/detments/economics/researchdiscussionpapers/2013/13-05FINAL.pdf).
14. Hewings G., Parr J. Spatial interdependence in a metropolitan setting. Spat. Econ. Anal. 2007, 2(1):7-22.
15. Hewings G., Okuyama Y., Sonis M. Economic interdependence within the Chicago metropolitan area: a Miyazawa analysis. J. Reg. Sci. 2001, 41(2):195-217.
16. 2 responsibility: an input-output approach for the Turkish economy. Energy Policy 2007, 35(2):855-868.
17. Jun M. An integrated metropolitan model incorporating demographic-economic, land-use and transport models. Urban Stud. 1999, 36(8):1399.
18. Jun M. A metropolitan input-output model: multisectoral and multispatial relations of production, income formation, and consumption. Ann. Reg. Sci. 2004, 38(1):131-147.
19. Kates R., Mayfield M., Torrie R., Witcher B. Methods for estimating greenhouse gases from local places. Local Environ. 1998, 3(3):279-297.
20. Kowalewksi J. Regionalization of national input-output tables: empirical evidence on the use of the FLQ formula. Reg. Stud. 2013, 1-11. (ahead-of-print).
21. Krugman P. Increasing returns and economic geography. J. Polit. Econ. 1991, 99(3):483-499.
22. Larsen H., Hertwich E. The case for consumption-based accounting of greenhouse gas emissions to promote local climate action. Environ. Sci. Pol. 2009, 12(7):791-798.
23. 2 multipliers in multi-region input-output models. Econ. Syst. Res. 2004, 16(4):391-412.
24. Leontief W. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1970, 52(3):262-271.
25. Madden M. Demographic-economic analysis in a multi-zonal region: a case study of Nordrhein-Westfalen. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 1985, 15(4):517-540.
26. Mäenpää I., Siikavirta H. Greenhouse gases embodied in the international trade and final consumption of Finland: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy 2007, 35(1):128-143.
27. McCann P. Urban and Regional Economics 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
28. 2 trade balance between Scotland and the rest of the UK: performing a multi-region environmental input-output analysis with limited data. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 29(4):662-673.
29. Miller R., Blair P. Input-Output Analysis 2009, Cambridge University Press.
30. 2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility?. Energy Policy 2001, 29(4):327-334.
31. Oosterhaven J., Stelder D. Regional and Interregional IO Analysis 2007.
32. 2 emissions at the urban scale: methodological challenges and insights from the United States. Energy Policy 2010, 38(9):4765-4782.
33. Peters G., Hertwich E. Pollution embodied in trade: the Norwegian case. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2006, 16(4):379-387.
34. Peters G., Hertwich E. Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption. Clim. Chang. 2008, 86(1-2):51-66.
35. Peters G., Hertwich E. The application of multi-regional input-output analysis to industrial ecology. Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology 2009, 847-863.
36. Ramaswami A., Hillman T., Janson B., Reiner M., Thomas G. A demand-centered, hybrid life-cycle methodology for city-scale greenhouse gas inventories. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42(17):6455-6461.
37. Salon D., Sperling D., Meier A., Murphy S., Gorham R., Barrett J. City carbon budgets: a proposal to align incentives for climate-friendly communities. Energy Policy 2010, 38(4):2032-2041.
38. 2 emissions embodied in international trade: evidence for Spain. Energy Policy 2004, 32(18):1999-2005.
39. Tohmo T. New developments in the use of location quotients to estimate regional input-output coefficients and multipliers. Reg. Stud. 2004, 38(1):43-54.
40. Turner K. Additional precision provided by region-specific data: the identification of fuel-use and pollution-generation coefficients in the Jersey economy. Reg. Stud. 2006, 40(4):347-364.
41. Turner K., Lenzen M., Wiedmann T., Barrett J. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities - part 1: a technical note on combining input-output and ecological footprint analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 62(1):37-44.
42. Turner K., Munday M., McIntyre S., Jensen C. Incorporating jurisdiction issues into regional carbon accounts under production and consumption accounting principles. Environ. Plan. Part A 2011, 43(3):722.
43. Weisz H., Steinberger J. Reducing energy and material flows in cities. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2010, 2(3):185-192.
44. Wiedmann T. A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69(2):211-222.
45. Wiedmann T., Lenzen M., Turner K., Barrett J. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities - part 2: review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61(1):15-26.
46. Wiedmann T., Wilting H., Lenzen M., Lutter S., Palm V. Quo vadis mrio? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input-output analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70(11):1937-1945.
47. Wu W. Carbon footprint - A Case Study on the Municipality of Haninge. Master of Science Thesis in Technology and, Health 2011, (http://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:442651).