Energy and visual comfort analysis of lighting and daylight control strategies

Building and Environment

Volumn 78, Issue , 2014, Pages 155-170

  Shen, Eric ^a   Hu, Jia ^a   Patel, Maulin ^a  

^a PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Daylight; Energy; Independent control; Integrated control; Lighting; Simulation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DAYLIGHTING; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; INTEGRATED CONTROL; LIGHTING; MATLAB; OFFICE BUILDINGS;

AUTOMATED CONTROL SYSTEMS; ENERGY; INDEPENDENT CONTROL; INTEGRATED CONTROL STRATEGY; QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON; REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION; SIMULATION; WINDOW-TO-WALL RATIO;

DAYLIGHT SIMULATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL SYSTEM; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; LIGHT; SHADING;

EID: 84900824344     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.04.028     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 2011 Buildings energy data book 2011, U.S. DOE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Washington, DC.
2. Galasiu A.D., Atif M.R., MacDonald R.A. Impact of window blinds on daylight-linked dimming and automatic on/off lighting controls. Sol Energy 2004, 76(5):523-544.
3. Yang I., Nam E. Economic analysis of the daylight-linked lighting control system in office buildings. Sol Energy 2010, 84(8):1513-1525.
4. Tzempelikos A., Athienitis A.K. The impact of shading design and control on building cooling and lighting demand. Sol Energy 2007, 81(3):369-382.
5. Mukherjee S., Birru D., Cavalcanti D., Shen E., Patel M., Wen Y.J., et al. Closed loop integrated lighting and daylighting control for low energy buildings. 2010 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings 2010, 9-252.
6. Reinhart C.F. Lightswitch-2002: a model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Sol Energy 2004, 77(1):15-28.
7. Lee E.S., Selkowitz S.E. The New York Times Headquarters daylighting mockup: monitored performance of the daylighting control system. Energy Build 2006, 38(7):914-929.
8. Littlefair P., Ortiz J., Bhaumik C.D. Asimulation of solar shading control on UK office energy use. Build Res Inf 2010, 38(6):638-646.
9. Koo S.Y., Yeo M.S., Kim K.W. Automated blind control to maximize the benefits of daylight in buildings. Build Environ 2010, 45(6):1508-1520.
10. Zhang S., Birru D. An open-loop venetian blind control to avoid direct sunlight and enhance daylight utilization. Sol Energy 2012, 86(3):860-866.
11. Hu J., Olbina S. Illuminance-based slat angle selection model for automated control of split blinds. Build Environ 2011, 46(3):786-796.
12. Tzempelikos A. The impact of venetian blind geometry and tilt angle on view, direct light transmission and interior illuminance. Sol Energy 2008, 82(12):1172-1191.
13. Guillemin A., Molteni S. An energy-efficient controller for shading devices self-adapting to the user wishes. Build Environ 2002, 37(11):1091-1097.
14. Daum D., Morel N. Identifying important state variables for a blind controller. Build Environ 2010, 45(4):887-900.
15. Olbina S., Hu J. Daylighting and thermal performance of automated split-controlled blinds. Build Environ 2012, 56(0):127.
16. Hu J., Olbina S. Radiance-based model for optimal selection of window systems. ASCE 2012 International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, Clearwater Beach, FL, USA 2012.
17. Kim D.W., Park C.S. Comparative control strategies of exterior and interior blind systems. Light Res Technol 2012, 44(3):291-308.
18. Shen E., Hong T. Simulation-based assessment of the energy savings benefits of integrated control in office buildings. Build Simul - Springer 2009, 239-251.
19. Hu J., Olbina S. A simulation-based model for integrated daylighting system design. J Comput Civ Eng 2013, 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000336.
20. Tzempelikos A., Shen H. Comparative control strategies for roller shades with respect to daylighting and energy performance. Build Environ 2013, 67:179-192.
21. Shen H., Tzempelikos A. Daylighting and energy analysis of private offices with automated interior roller shades. Sol Energy 2012, 86(2):681-704.
22. Chan Y., Tzempelikos A. Ahybrid ray-tracing and radiosity method for calculating radiation transport and illuminance distribution in spaces with venetian blinds. Sol Energy 2012, 86(11):3109-3124.
23. Chan Y., Tzempelikos A. Efficient venetian blind control strategies considering daylight utilization and glare protection. Sol Energy 2013, 98:241-254.
24. Li D.H.W., Lam J.C. Evaluation of lighting performance in office buildings with daylighting controls. Energy Build 2001, 33(8):793-803.
25. Patel M., Enscoe A., Mukherjee S., Birru D. Preliminary results from an integrated lighting and daylight control demonstration at Fort Irwin. The 2011 IES Annual Conference, Austin, TX 2011.
26. Crawley D.B., Lawrie L.K., Winkelmann F.C., Buhl W.F., Huang Y.J., Pedersen C.O., et al. EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy Build 2001, 33(4):319-331.
27. Wetter M., Nouidui T.S., Haves P. Building controls virtual test bed Aug. 2013, http://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/bcvtb.
28. Inanici M.N., Navvab M. The virtual lighting laboratory: per-pixel luminance data analysis. Leukos 2006, 3(2):89-104.
29. Rea M.S. The IESNA lighting handbook 2000, Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York. 10th ed.
30. Chaiwiwatworakul P., Chirarattananon S., Rakkwamsuk P. Application of automated blind for daylighting in tropical region. Energy Convers Manag 2009, 50(12):2927-2943.