Cloud model-based failure mode and effects analysis for prioritization of failures of power transformer in risk assessment

International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1172-1190

  Liao, Ruijin ^a   Bian, Jianpeng ^a   Yang, Lijun ^a   Grzybowski, Stanislaw ^b  

^a CHONGQING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cloud model; FMEA; preventive maintenance; risk assessment

Indexed keywords

CLOUD COMPUTING; FAILURE MODES; PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CLOUD MODELING; FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS; FMEA; MAINTENANCE DECISION MAKING; MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES; OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS; POTENTIAL FAILURE MODES; QUALITATIVE EVALUATIONS;

POWER TRANSFORMERS;

EID: 84900815189     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20507038     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etep.1647     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Franzén A, Karlsson S,. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis of Transformers. Royal Institute of Technology, KTH School of Electrical Engineering: Stockholm, Sweden, 2007.
2. Hua AH, Hsu CW, Kuo TC, et al,. Risk evaluation of green components to hazardous substance using FMEA and FAHP. Expert Systems with Applications 2009; 36: 7142-7147.
3. Hoseynabadi HA, Oraee H, Tavner PJ,. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for wind turbines. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 2010; 32: 817-824.
4. Stamatis DH,. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution. ASQC Quality Press: Milwaukee, WI, 1995.
5. Bowles JB,. An assessment of PRN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis. Journal of the IEST 2004; 47: 51-56.
6. Braglia M, Frosolini M, Montanari R,. Fuzzy criticality assessment model for failure modes and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 2003; 20 (4): 503-524.
7. Gilchrist W,. Modelling failure modes and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 1993; 10 (5): 16-23.
8. Moss TR, Woodhouse J,. Criticality analysis revisited. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 1999; 15 (2): 117-121.
9. Daya MB, Raouf A,. A revised failure mode and effects analysis model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 1996; 13 (1): 43-47.
10. Sankar NR, Prabhu BS,. Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 2001; 18 (3): 324-335.
11. Keller AZ, Zaitri K,. Further applications of fuzzy logic to reliability assessment and safety analysis. Microelectronics Reliability 1989; 29: 399-404.
12. Wang J, Ruxton T, Labrie CR,. Design for safety of engineering systems with multiple failure state variables. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1995; 50: 271-284.
13. Braglia M,. MAFMA: multi-attribute failure mode analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 2000; 17 (9): 1017-1033.
14. Xu K, Tang LC, Xie M, et al,. Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2002; 75: 17-29.
15. Guimarães ACF, Lapa CMF,. Fuzzy FMEA applied to PWR chemical and volume control system. Progress in Nuclear Energy 2004; 44: 191-213.
16. Bowles JB, Pelaez CE,. Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1995; 50: 203-213.
17. Pillay A, Wang J,. Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2003; 79 (1): 69-85.
18. Wang YM, Chin KS, Kwai Poon GK, et al,. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications 2009; 36: 1195-1207.
19. Braglia M, Frosolini M, Montanari R,. Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2003; 19: 425-443.
20. Chang CL, Wei CC, Lee YH,. Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy method and grey theory. Kybernetes 1999; 28 (9): 1072-1080.
21. Sokolov V, Berler Z, Rashkes V,. Effective methods of assessment of insulation system conditions in power transformers: a view based on practical experience. Electrical Insulation Conference and Electrical Manufacturing & Coil Winding Conference 1999; 10: 659-667.
22. Yang ZL, Bonsall S, Wang J,. Fuzzy rule-based Bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failures in FMEA. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 2008; 57 (3): 517-528.
23. Chin KS, Wang YM, Poon GKK, et al,. Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis. Decision Support Systems 2009; 48: 246-256.
24. Li DY, Liu CY, Du Y, et al,. Artificial intelligence with uncertainty. Journal of Software 2004; 15 (9): 1583-1594.
25. Li DY, Liu CY,. The universality of normal cloud model. Engineering and Science 2004; 6 (8): 28-34.
26. Di KC, Li DY, Li DR,. Cloud theory and its applications in spatial data mining and knowledge discovery. Journal of Image and Graphics 1999; 4 (11): 930-935.
27. Meng XY, Zhang GW, Liu CY, et al,. Research on subjective trust management model based on cloud model. Journal of System Simulation 2007; 19 (14): 3310-3317.
28. Li Z, Yang YD,. A novel intelligent controller based on uncertainty reasoning of two-dimension cloud model. Control and Decision 2005; 20 (8): 866-872.
29. Wang YY,. Study on condition maintenance decision making method of power transformer based on reliability and risk evaluation. Chongqing University Doctor Thesis, 2008.
30. Jiao P, Zha YB,. Credibility evaluation method based on cloud model. International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering 2010; 648-651.