Development of a global computable general equilibrium model coupled with detailed energy end-use technology

Applied Energy

Volumn 128, Issue , 2014, Pages 296-306

  Fujimori, Shinichiro ^a   Masui, Toshihiko ^a   Matsuoka, Yuzuru ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computable general equilibrium model; Energy end use technologies; Hybrid model; Integrated assessment model

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATES; CARBON; ELASTICITY; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GREENHOUSE GASES; TECHNOLOGY;

AGGREGATED MODELING; CLIMATE MITIGATIONS; COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL; END-USE TECHNOLOGIES; ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS; HYBRID MODEL; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELS; PROBABILISTIC FUNCTIONS;

CLIMATE MODELS;

COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS; DEMAND ANALYSIS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY USE; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT; LOGIT ANALYSIS; MITIGATION; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84900813136     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.074     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. -2 radiative forcing. Climatic Change 2011, 109:59-76.
2. Thomson A.M., Calvin K.V., Smith S.J., Kyle G.P., Volke A., Patel P., et al. RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100. Climatic Change 2011, 109:77-94.
3. van Vuuren D.P., Stehfest E., Elzen M.G.J., Kram T., Vliet J., Deetman S., et al. RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2 C. Climatic Change 2011, 109:95-116.
4. Riahi K., Rao S., Krey V., Cho C., Chirkov V., Fischer G., et al. RCP 8.5-a scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Climatic Change 2011, 109:33-57.
5. Kriegler E., Edenhofer O., Reuster L., Luderer G., Klein D. Is atmospheric carbon dioxide removal a game changer for climate change mitigation?. Climatic Change 2013, 118:45-57.
6. 2 mitigation in China within a climate-protection world: a scenarios analysis using REMIND. Appl Energy 2014, 115:445-455.
7. Calvin K., Clarke L., Krey V., Blanford G., Jiang K., Kainuma M., et al. The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: results from the Asia modeling exercise. Energy Econ 2012, 34:S251-S260.
8. Angelo G, Reilly JM, Paltsev S. Potential land use implications of a global biofuels industry. MIT joint program on the science and policy of global change; 2008.
9. Waisman H., Guivarch C., Grazi F., Hourcade J.C. The Imaclim-R model: infrastructures, technical inertia and the costs of low carbon futures under imperfect foresight. Climatic Change 2012, 114:101-120.
10. Bouwman AF, Kram T, Klein Goldewijk K, editors. Integrated modelling of global environmental change. An overview of IMAGE 2.4. Bilthoven: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency; 2006.
11. Oladosu G. Estimates of the global indirect energy-use emission impacts of USA biofuel policy. Appl Energy 2012, 99:85-96.
12. Huang J., Yang J., Msangi S., Rozelle S., Weersink A. Global biofuel production and poverty in China. Appl Energy 2012, 98:246-255.
13. Liang Q.-M., Wei Y.-M. Distributional impacts of taxing carbon in China: results from the CEEPA model. Appl Energy 2012, 92:545-551.
14. Messner S., Schrattenholzer L. MESSAGE-MACRO: linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively. Energy 2000, 25:267-282.
15. Murphy R., Jaccard M. Energy efficiency and the cost of GHG abatement: a comparison of bottom-up and hybrid models for the US. Energy Policy 2011, 39:7146-7155.
16. Drouet L., Haurie A., Labriet M., Thalmann P., Vielle M., Viguier L. A coupled bottom-up/top-down model for GHG abatement scenarios in the Swiss housing sector. Energy and environment 2005, 27-61. Springer, US. J.-P. Waaub, G. Zaccour, R. Loulou (Eds.).
17. Andreas S., Henry D.J. Experiments with a hybrid CGE-MARKAL model. Energy J 2006, 171-177.
18. Sands R.D. Dynamics of carbon abatement in the second generation model. Energy Econ 2004, 26:721-738.
19. Böhringer C. The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modeling. Energy Econ 1998, 20:233-248.
20. Sue Wing I. The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down approaches to climate policy modeling: electric power technology detail in a social accounting framework. Energy Econ 2008, 30:547-573.
21. Hasegawa T., Fujimori S., Shin Y., Takahashi K., Masui T., Tanaka A. Climate change impact and adaptation assessment on food consumption utilizing a new scenario framework. Environ Sci Technol 2014, 48(1):438-445. 10.1021/es4034149.
22. Lofgren H., Harris R.L., Robinson S. A standard computable general equilibrium (CGE) model in gams 2002, Microcomputers in policy research: International Food Policy Research Institute.
23. Fujimori S., Masui T., Matsuoka Y. AIM/CGE [basic] manual. Discussion paper series 2012, Center for Social and Environmental Systems Research, National Institute Environemntal Studies.
24. Akashi O., Hanaoka T. Technological feasibility and costs of achieving a 50% reduction of global GHG emissions by 2050: mid- and long-term perspectives. Sustain Sci 2012, 7:139-156.
25. Dimaranan BV. Global trade, assistance, and production: the GTAP 6 data base. In: Dimaranan BV, editor. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University; 2006.
26. IEA. Energy balances for OECD countries. In: OECD/IEA, editor. Paris, France; 2009.
27. IEA. Energy balances for non-OECD countries. In: OECD/IEA, editor. Paris, France; 2009.
28. UN. National accounts main aggregates database. In: Nations U, editor. New York, USA; 2007.
29. Fujimori S., Matsuoka Y. Development of method for estimation of world industrial energy consumption and its application. Energy Econ 2011, 33:461-473.
30. EC-JRC/PBL. Emission database for global atmospheric research (EDGAR), release version 4.2. In: European Commission JRCJNEAAP, editor; 2012.
31. Moss R.H., Edmonds J.A., Hibbard K.A., Manning M.R., Rose S.K., van Vuuren D.P., et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 2010, 463:747-756.
32. IIASA. Shared socioeconomic pathways (SSP) database version 0.9.3; 2012.
33. Babiker MH, Reilly JM, Mayer M, Eckaus RS, Wing IS, Hyman RC. The MIT emissions prediction and policy analysis (EPPA) model; revisions, sensitivities, and comparisons of results. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. Cambridge; MA; 2001.
34. Fisher BS, Nakicenovic N, Alfsen K, Morlot JC, Chesnaye Fdl, Hourcade JC, et al. Issues related to mitigation in the long term context. In: Metz ORD B, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA, editor. Climate change 2007: mitigation contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the inter-governmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2007.