Neurocognitive brain response to transient impairment of wernicke's area

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1474-1484

  Mason, Robert A ^a   Prat, Chantel S ^b,c   Just, Marcel Adam ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Psychology ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain adaptation; Brain trauma; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Language; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE FRONTAL GYRUS; NEUROMONITORING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; POSTERIOR RIGHT HEMISPHERE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; WERNICKE AREA; WORKING MEMORY; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; LANGUAGE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE TRACT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; READING; SHORT TERM MEMORY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; READING; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WERNICKE AREA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84900794950     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs423     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Andoh J, Artiges E, Pallier C, Rivière D, Mangin JF, Cachia A, Plaze M, Paillère-Martinot ML, Martinot JL. 2006. Modulation of language areas with functional MR image-guided magnetic stimulation. Neu-roimage. 29:619-627.
2. Bestmann S, Ruff CC, Blankenburg F, Weiskopf N, Driver J, Rothwell JC. 2008. Mapping causal interregional influences with concurrent TMS-fMRI. Exp Brain Res. 191:383-402.
3. Bohning DE, Pecheny AP, Epstein CM, Speer AM, Vincent DJ, Dannels W, George MS. 1997. Mapping transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) fields in vivo with MRI. Neuroreport. 8:2535-2538.
4. Bohning DE, Shastri A, McConnell K, Nahas Z. 1999. A combined TMS/fMRI study of intensity-dependent TMS over motor cortex. Biol Psychiatry. 45:385-394.
5. Brown JI. 1960. The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Oxford (UK): Houghton Mifflin.
6. Cappa SF, Vallar G. 1992. The role of the left and right hemispheres in recovery from aphasia. Aphasiology. 6:359-372.
7. Chatrian GE, Lettich E, Nelson PL. 1988. Modified nomenclature for the "10%" electrode system. J Clin Neurophysiol. 5:183-186.
8. Daneman M, Carpenter PA. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. J Verbal Learn Verbal. 466:450-466.
9. Day BL, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Maertens de Noordhout A, Naka-shima K, Shannon K, Marsden CD. 1989. Delay in the execution of voluntary movement by electrical or magnetic brain stimulation in intact man. Evidence for the storage of motor programs in the brain. Brain. 112:649-663
10. Draganski B, Gaser C, Busch V, Schuierer G, Bogdahn U, May A. 2004. Changes in grey matter induced by training newly honed juggling skills show up as a transient feature on a brain-imaging scan. Nature. 427:311-312.
11. Ferstl EC. 2007. The functional neuroanatomy of text comprehension: what's the story so far? In: Schmalhofer F, Perfetti CA, editors. Higher level language processes in the brain: inference and comprehension processes. Erlbaum. p. 53-102.
12. Ferstl EC, Guthke T, von Cramon DY. 2002. Text comprehension after brain injury: left prefrontal lesions affect inference processes. Neuropsychology. 16:292-308.
13. Flöel A. 2012. Non-invasive brain stimulation and language processing in the healthy brain. Aphasiology. 26:1082-1102.
14. Flöel A, Cohen LG. 2007. Contribution of noninvasive cortical stimulation to the study of memory functions. Brain Res Rev. 53:250-259
15. Friederici AD, Rüschemeyer S-A, Hahne A, Fiebach CJ. 2003. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cereb Cortex. 13:170-177.
16. Gallagher HL, Frith CD. 2003. Functional imaging of "theory of mind". Trends Cogn Sci. 7:77-83.
17. Grafman J. 2000. Conceptualizing functional neuroplasticity. J Commun Disord. 33:345-355; quiz 355-356.
18. Jung-Beeman M. 2005. Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends Cogn Sci. 9:512-518.
19. Just MA, Carpenter PA, Keller TA, Eddy WF, Thulborn KR. 1996. Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science. 274:114-116.
20. Just MA, Varma S. 2007. The organization of thinking: what functional brain imaging reveals about the neuroarchitecture of complex cognition. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 7:153-191.
21. Karbe H, Thiel A, Weber-Luxenburger G, Herholz K, Kessler J, Heiss WD. 1998. Brain plasticity in poststroke aphasia: what is the contribution of the right hemisphere? Brain Lang. 64:215-230.
22. Keller TA, Carpenter PA, Just MA. 2001. The neural bases of sentence comprehension: a fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. Cereb Cortex. 11:223-237.
23. Kim Y-H, Min S-J, Ko M-H, Park J-W, Jang SH, Lee PKW. 2005. Facilitating visuospatial attention for the contralateral hemifield by repetitive TMS on the posterior parietal cortex. Neurosci Lett. 382:280-285.
24. Knecht S, Flöel A, Dräger B, Breitenstein C, Sommer J, Henningsen H, Ringelstein EB, Pascual-Leone A. 2002. Degree of language lateralization determines susceptibility to unilateral brain lesions. Nat Neurosci. 5:695-699.
25. Lerner Y, Honey CJ, Silbert LJ, Hasson U. 2011. Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story. J Neurosci. 31:2906-2915.
26. Mason RA, Just MA. 2006. Neuroimaging contributions to the understanding of discourse processes. In: Traxler MJ, Gernsbacher MA, editors. Handbook of psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 765-799.
27. Mason RA, Just MA, Keller TA, Carpenter PA. 2003. Ambiguity in the brain: what brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 29:1319-1338.
28. Mason RA, Williams DL, Kana RK, Minshew N, Just MA. 2008. Theory of Mind disruption and recruitment of the right hemisphere during narrative comprehension in autism. Neuropsychologia. 46:269-280.
29. Mimura M, Kato M, Sano Y, Kojima T, Naeser M, Kashima H. 1998. Prospective and retrospective studies of recovery in aphasia. Changes in cerebral blood flow and language functions. Brain. 121:2083-2094.
30. Mottaghy FM, Krause BJ, Kemna LJ, Töpper R, Tellmann L, Beu M, Pascual-Leone A, Müller-Gärtner HW. 2000. Modulation of the neuronal circuitry subserving working memory in healthy human subjects by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurosci Lett. 280:167-170.
31. Oldfield RC. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9:97-113.
32. Oliveri M, Rossini PM, Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Filippi MM, Pasqualetti P, Tomaiuolo F, Caltagirone C. 1999. Left frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces contralesional extinction in patients with unilateral right brain damage. Brain. 122(Pt 9):1731-1739.
33. O'Shea J, Johansen-Berg H, Trief D, Göbel S, Rushworth MFS. 2007. Functionally specific reorganization in human premotor cortex. Neuron. 54:479-490.
34. Papagno C, Fogliata A, Catricalà E, Miniussi C. 2009. The lexical processing of abstract and concrete nouns. Brain Res. 1263:78-86.
35. Pascual-Leone A, Gates JR, Dhuna A. 1991. Induction of speech arrest and counting errors with rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 41:697-702.
36. Prat CS, Just MA. 2011. Exploring the neural dynamics underpinning individual differences in sentence comprehension. Cereb Cortex. 21:1747-1760.
37. Prat CS, Keller TA, Just MA. 2007. Individual differences in sentence comprehension: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of syntactic and lexical processing demands. J Cogn Neuro-sci. 19:1950-1963.
38. Prat CS, Mason RA, Just MA. 2011. Individual differences in the neural basis of causal inferencing. Brain Lang. 116:1-13.
39. Prat CS, Mason RA, Just MA. 2012. An fMRI investigation of analogical mapping in metaphor comprehension: the influence of context and individual cognitive capacities on processing demands. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 38:282-294.
40. Raven J. 2000. The Raven's progressive matrices: change and stability over culture and time. Cogn Psychol. 41:1-48.
41. Robertson EM, Théoret H, Pascual-Leone A. 2003. Studies in cognition: the problems solved and created by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci. 15:948-960.
42. Röder B, Stock O, Neville H, Bien S, Rösler F. 2002. Brain activation modulated by the comprehension of normal and pseudo-word sentences of different processing demands: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage. 15:1003-1014.
43. Ruff CC, Bestmann S, Blankenburg F, Bjoertomt O, Josephs O, Weiskopf N, Deichmann R, Driver J. 2008. Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI. Cereb Cortex. 18:817-827.
44. Ruff CC, Blankenburg F, Bjoertomt O, Bestmann S, Freeman E, Haynes J-D, Rees G, Josephs O, Deichmann R, Driver J. 2006. Concurrent TMS-fMRI and psychophysics reveal frontal influences on human retinotopic visual cortex. Curr Biol. 16:1479-1488.
45. Ruff CC, Blankenburg F, Bjoertomt O, Bestmann S, Weiskopf N, Driver J. 2009. Hemispheric differences in frontal and parietal influences on human occipital cortex: direct confirmation with concurrent TMS-fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci. 21:1146-1161.
46. Rypma B, Prabhakaran V. 2009. When less is more and when more is more: the mediating roles of capacity and speed in brain-behavior efficiency. Intelligence. 37:207-222.
47. Sack AT, Kohler A, Bestmann S, Linden DEJ, Dechent P, Goebel R, Baudewig J. 2007. Imaging the brain activity changes underlying impaired visuospatial judgments: simultaneous fMRI, TMS, and behavioral studies. Cereb Cortex. 17:2841-2852.
48. Sandrini M, Umiltà C, Rusconi E. 2011. The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience: a new synthesis of methodological issues. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 35:516-536.
49. Saxe R, Carey S, Kanwisher N. 2004. Understanding other minds: linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annu Rev Psychol. 55:87-124.
50. Schuhmann T, Schiller NO, Goebel R, Sack AT. 2009. The temporal characteristics of functional activation in Broca's area during overt picture naming. Cortex. 45:1111-1116.
51. Thiel A, Habedank B, Herholz K, Kessler J, Winhuisen L, Haupt WF, Heiss W-D. 2006. From the left to the right: how the brain compensates progressive loss of language function. Brain Lang. 98:57-65.
52. Thulborn KR, Carpenter PA, Just MA. 1999. Plasticity of language-related brain function during recovery from stroke. Stroke. 30: 749-754.
53. Turkeltaub PE, Coslett HB, Thomas AL, Faseyitan O, Benson J, Norise C, Hamilton RH. 2012. The right hemisphere is not unitary in its role in aphasia recovery. Cortex. 48:1179-1186.
54. Vogeley K, Bussfeld P, Newen A, Herrmann S, Happé F, Falkai P, Maier W, Shah NJ, Fink GR, Zilles K. 2001. Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. Neuroimage. 14:170-181.
55. Weiller C, Isensee C, Rijntjes M, Huber W, Müller S, Bier D, Dutschka K, Woods RP, Noth J, Diener HC. 1995. Recovery from Wernicke's aphasia: a positron emission tomographic study. Ann Neurol. 37:723-732.
56. Winhuisen L, Thiel A, Schumacher B, Kessler J, Rudolf J, Haupt WF, Heiss WD. 2005. Role of the contralateral inferior frontal gyrus in recovery of language function in poststroke aphasia: a combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and positron emission tomography study. Stroke. 36:1759-1763.
57. Xu J, Kemeny S, Park G, Frattali C, Braun A. 2005. Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. Neuroimage. 25:1002-1015.