Theorizing formal pluralism: Quantification of legal pluralism for spatio – temporal analysis

Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law

Volumn 36, Issue 50, 2004, Pages 101-118

  Sezgin, Yüksel ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900759546     PISSN: 07329113     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07329113.2004.10756580     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. BENDA-BECKMANN, Franz von 1997 ’Citizens, strangers and indigenous peoples: conceptual politics and legal pluralism.’ Law & Anthropology 9: 1-42.
2. BENDA-BECKMANN, Keebet von 2001 ’Legal pluralism.’ Tai Culture, 6: 18-40.
3. BENTON, L. 2002 Law and Colonial Cultures. Legal Regimes in World History, 1400-1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. COVER, R. 1995 ’Nomos and narrative.’ Pp. 95-172 in M. Minow, M. Ryan and A. Sarat (eds.), Narrative, Violence and the Law. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
5. DARIANSMITH, E., and P. FITZPATRICK (eds.) 1999 Laws of the Postcolonial. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
6. EVANS, P. B. 1995 Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
7. FITZPATRICK, Peter 1983 ’Law, plurality and underdevelopment.’ Pp. 159-182 in D. Sugarman (ed.), Legality, Ideology and the State. London: Academic Press.
8. FITZPATRICK, Peter 1984 ’Law and Societies.’ Osgoode Hall Law Journel 22: 115-138.
9. GALANTER, Marc and R. DHAVAN 1989 Law and Society in Modern India. Delhi; New York: Oxford University Press.
10. GRIFFITHS, John 1986 ’What is Legal Pluralism?’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 24: 1-55.
11. HALL, P.A. and R.C.R. Taylor 1996 ’Political Science and the three new institutionalisms.’ Political Studies 44: 936-957.
12. HOOKER, M. B. 1975 Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonial Laws. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13. HUNT, A. 1993 Explorations in Law and Society: Toward A Constitutive Theory of Law. New York: Routledge.
14. LARSON, G.J. 2001 Religion and Personal Law in Secular India: A Call to Judgment. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15. MAHMOOD, S.T. 2001 ’The Shari’at courts in modern India.’ Unpublished Paper.
16. MAHMOOD, T. 2002 The Muslim law of India (3rd ed.). New Delhi: LexisNexis.
17. MAHONEY, J. and D. RUESCHEMEYER 2003 Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, U.K., New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. MERRY, S.E. 1988 ’Legal Pluralism.’ Law & Society Review 22: 869-896.
19. MIGDAL, J.S. 2001 State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. MITCHELL, T. MIGDAL, J.S. 1991 ’The limits of the state: beyond statist approaches and their critics.’ American Political Science Review 85: 77-96.
21. NORTH, D. 1990 Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. NORTH, D. 1991 ’Institutions.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 97-112.
23. PIERSON, P. 2000 ’Increasing returns, path dependency, and the study of politics.’ American Political Science Review 94: 251-267.
24. PIERSON, P. 2004 Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
25. SARTORI, G. 1984 ’Guidelines for concept analysis.’ Pp. 15-88 in G. Sartori (ed.), Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
26. SCHARF, W., and D. NINA, 2001 The Other Law: Non-State Ordering in South Africa. Lansdowne: Juta.
27. SEZGIN, Y. 2004 ’A political account for legal confrontation between state and society: the case of Israeli legal pluralism.’ Pp. 199-235 in A. Sarat and P. Ewick (eds.), Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 32. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
28. SILBEY, S.S. 1992 ’Making a place for cultural analyses of law.’ Law & Social Inquiry 17: 39-48.
29. SNYDER, F. 1981 ’Anthropology, dispute processes and law: a critical introduction.’ British Journal of Law & Society 8: 141-180.
30. TAMANAHA, B.Z. 1993 ’The folly of the –social scientific— concept of legal pluralism.’ Journal of Law and Society 20: 192-217.
31. THELEN, K. 1999 ’Historical institutionalism in comparative politics.’ Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369-404.
32. THOMPSON, E. 2000 Colonial Citizens: Republican Rights, Paternal Privilege, and Gender in French Syria and Lebanon. New York: Columbia University Press.
33. UNGER, R.M. 1976 Law in Modern Society. New York: The Free Press.
34. VANDERLINDEN, J. 1989 ’Return to legal pluralism: twenty years later.’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 28: 149-157.
35. WILSON, R. 2001 The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. WOODMAN, G.R. 1999 ’The idea of legal pluralism.’ Pp. 3-19 in B. Dupret, M. Berger and L. al-Zwaini (eds.), Legal Pluralism in the Arab World. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
37. YILMAZ, I. 1999 Dynamic Legal Pluralism and The Reconstruction of Unofficial Muslim Laws in England, Turkey and Pakistan. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, SOAS, University of London.
38. YILMAZ, I. 2005 Muslim Laws, Politics and Society in Modern Nation States: Dynamic Legal Pluralisms in England, Turkey and Pakistan. Aldershot: Ashgate.
39. YOUNG, C. 1994 The African Colonial State in Comparative Perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.