A National Dissemination Program

New Perspectives on Aggression Replacement Training: Practice, Research and Application

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 139-150

  Mcguire, James ^a   Clark, Danny ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b National Probation Service   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aggression Replacement Training (ART); Cochrane evidence based approach; Crime Reduction Programme; Joint Accreditation Panel; Offender Group Reconviction Scale, Version 2 (OGRS 2); Offenders Index; Pre Sentence Reports (PSRs); Wiltshire ART program

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900718672     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/0470030380.ch9     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Cann, J., Falshaw, L., Nugent, F., & Friendship, C. (2003). Understanding "What Works": Accredited cognitive skills programmes for adult men and young offenders. Findings 226. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
2. Cochrane, A. L. (1979). 1931-1971: A critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. In Medicines for the Year 2000. London: Office of Health Economics.
3. Falshaw, L., Friendship, C., Travers, R., & Nugent, F. (2003). Searching for "What Works": An evaluation of cognitive skills programmes. Findings 206. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
4. Friendship, C., Blud, L., Erikson, M.,& Travers, R. (2002). An evaluation of cognitive-behavioural treatment for prisoners. Findings 161. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
5. Friendship, C., Thornton, D., Erikson, M., & Beech A. R. (2001). Reconviction: A critique and comparison of two main data sources in England andWales. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 121-129.
6. Gendreau, P. (1996). Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 144-161.
7. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (1999). The forgotten issue in effective correctional treatment: Programme implementation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 180-187.
8. Goldblatt, P. & Lewis, C. (1998). Reducing offending: An assessment of research evidence on ways of dealing with offending behaviour. Home Office Research Study No.187. London: Home Office.
9. Goldstein, A. P. & Glick, B. (1987). Aggression Replacement Training. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
10. Goldstein, A. P.& Glick, B. (2001). Aggression Replacement Training: Application and evaluation management. In G. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington,& A. Lescheid (Eds), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programmes (pp. 121-148). Chichester: JohnWiley & Sons.
11. Goldstein, A. P., Glick, B., Carthan, M.,& Blancero, D. (1994). The pro-social gang: Implementing aggression replacement training. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Hollin, C. R. (1999). Treatment programmes for offenders: Meta-analysis, "What Works", and beyond. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 361-371.
13. Hollin, C. R., McGuire, J., Palmer, E., Bilby, C., Hatcher, R., & Holmes, A. (2002). Introducing Pathfinder programmes into the Probation Service: An interim report. Home Office Research Study 247. London: Home Office.
14. Home Office Probation Unit (1999). What Works Initiative: Crime Reduction Programme. Joint Prison and Probation Accreditation Criteria. London: Home Office.
15. Lipton, D., Thornton, D., McGuire, J., Porporino, F., & Hollin, C. R. (2000). Programme accreditation and correctional treatment. Substance Use and Misuse, 35, 1705-1734.
16. Lösel, F. (2001). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional programmes: Bridging the gap between research and practice. In G. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington, & A. Lescheid (Eds), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programmes (pp. 67-92). Chichester: JohnWiley & Sons.
17. McGuire, J. (2000). Defining correctional programs. Forum on Corrections Research, 12, 5-9.
18. McGuire, J. (2001). What works in correctional intervention? Evidence and practical implications.In G. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington, & A. Lescheid (Eds), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programmes (pp. 25-43). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
19. McGuire, J. (2002). Criminal sanctions versus psychological interventions with offenders: A comparative empirical analysis. Psychology, Crime and Law, 8, 183-208.
20. McGuire, J. (2004). Understanding psychology and crime: perspectives on theory and action. Buckingham: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
21. Mulrow, C. D. (1987). The medical review article: state of the science. Annals of Internal Medicine, 106, 485-488.
22. Petrosino, A. J., Boruch, R. F., Rounding, C., McDonald, S., & Chalmers, I. (1999). A Social, Psychological, Educational and Criminological Trials Register (SPECTR) to facilitate the preparation and maintenance of systematic reviews of social and educational interventions. Background paper for the Cochrane Collaboration meeting, School of Public Policy, University College London, July.
23. Posavac, E. J. & Carey, R. G. (1997). Programme evaluation: Methods and case studies (5th edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24. Sherman, L.W., Farrington, D. P.,Welsh, B. C.,& MacKenzie, D. L. (Eds) (2002). Evidence-based crime prevention. London and New York: Routledge.
25. Stecher, B. M. & Davis, W. A. (1987). How to focus an evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Sugg, D. (2000). Wiltshire Aggression Replacement Therapy (ART): One-year reconvictons and targeting. Unpublished report, Research Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office, London.
27. Taylor, R. (1999). Predicting reconvictions for sexual and violent offences using the revised offender group reconviction scale. Research Findings No. 104. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
28. Travers, R. (2001). A comparison of intermediate psychometric measures and programme delivery quality at HM Prison establishments. Paper presented to the Joint Prison and Probation Offending Behaviour Programmes Accreditation Panel, March, Oxford.
29. Underdown, A. (1998). Strategies for effective offender supervision: Report of the HMIP What Works project. London: Home Office.
30. Vennard, J., Sugg, D., & Hedderman, C. (1997). Changing offenders' attitudes and behaviour: What works? Home Office Research Study No. 171. London: HMSO.