Guiding visually impaired walking groups: Intercorporeal experience and ethical sensibilities

Touching Space, Placing Touch

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 131-150

  Macpherson, Hannah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900714024     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Allen, C. 2004. Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology and the body-in-space encounters of visually impaired children. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 719-35.
2. Allahyari, R. 2000. Visions of Charity: Volunteer Workers and Moral Community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3. Bissell, D. 2010. Passenger mobilities: affective atmospheres and the sociality of public transport. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(2), 270-89.
4. Butler, R. and Bowlby S. 1997. Bodies and spaces: an exploration of disabled people's experiences of public space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15, 411-33.
5. Caputo, J.D. 2003. Against principles: A sketch of an ethics without ethics, in The Ethical, edited by E. Wyshogrod and G.P. McKenny. Oxford: Blackwell, 169-80.
6. Charidi, E. 2009. How could blindness 'touch' the grounds of visuality?, Paper at Visuality/Materiality: Reviewing Theory, Method and Practice Conference, Royal Institute for British Architects, London, 9th-11th July.
7. Connolly, W.E. 2002. Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed. London: University of Minnesota Press.
8. Cook, I. 1992. Drowning in See-World? Critical Ethnographies of Blindness. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of Kentucky.
9. Crang, M. 2003. Qualitative methods: touchy, feely, look-see? Progress in Human Geography, 274, 494-504.
10. Crooks, V.A. 2010. Women's changing experiences of the home and life inside it after becoming chronically ill, in Towards Enabling Geographies: 'Disabled' Bodies and Minds in Society and Space, edited by V. Chouinard et al. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
11. Diprose, R. 2002. Corporeal Generosity: On Giving With Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty, and Levinas. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
12. Douglas, M. 1990. Foreword, in The Gift, by M. Maus. London: Routledge.
13. Golledge, R.G. 1992. Geography and the disabled: a survey with special reference to vision impaired and blind populations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 18, 63-85.
14. Harrison, P. 2000. Making sense: embodiment and the sensibilities of the everyday. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 497-517.
15. Harrison, P. 2008. Corporeal remains: vulnerability, proximity, and living on after the end of the world. Environment and Planning A, 40(2), 423-45.
16. Hetherington, K. 2002. The unsightly: Touching the Parthenon Frieze. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(5/6), 187-205.
17. Hetherington, K. 2003. Spatial textures: place, touch and praesentia. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1933-44.
18. Hill, M. 1985. Bound to the environment: Towards a phenomenology of sightlessness, in Dwelling, Place and Environment, edited by D. Seamon and R. Mugaerauer. Dordrecht Press, 99-111.
19. Hull, J. 1990. Touching the Rock: An Experience of Blindness. London: SPCK Publishing.
20. Hull, J. 2001. Recognising another world. Access, The National Journal for People with a Disability, 3(2), 23-26.
21. Jacobson, R.D. and Kitchin, R.M. 1997. GIS and people with visual impairments or blindness: Exploring the potential for education, orientation and navigation. Transactions in Geographic Information Systems, 2(4), 315-32.
22. Keller, H. 1908. The World I Live In. New York: New York Review of Books.
23. Kitchin, R., Blades, M. and Golledge, R.G. 1997. Understanding spatial concepts at the geographic scale without the use of vision. Progress in Human Geography, 21(2), 225-42.
24. Kleege, G. 1998. Sight Unseen. London: Yale University Press.
25. Latour, B. 2004. How to talk about the body? The Normative dimension of science Studies. Body & Society, 10(2/3), 205-29.
26. Lorimer, H. and K. Lund K. 2003. Performing facts: finding a way over Scotland's mountains, in Nature Performed: Environment, Culture and Performance, edited by B.H. Szerszynski and W. Waterton. London: Blackwells, 130-45.
27. Lorimer, H. 2005. Cultural geography: the busyness of being 'more-than-representational'. Progress in Human Geography, 29(1), 83-94.
28. Lorimer, H. 2006. Herding memories of humans and animals. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(4), 497-518.
29. Macpherson, H.M. 2008. 'I don't know why they call it the Lake District they might as well call it the rock district!' The workings of humour and laughter in research with members of visually impaired walking groups. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(6), 1080-95.
30. Macpherson, H.M. 2009a. The inter-corporeal emergence of landscape: negotiating sight, blindness and ideas of landscape in the British Countryside. Environment and Planning A, 41(5), 1042-54.
31. Macpherson, H.M. 2009b. Articulating blind touch: thinking through the feet. Senses and Society, 4(2), 179-92.
32. McCormack, D.P. 2003. An event of geographical ethics in spaces of affect. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(4), 488-507.
33. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenolgy of Perception. London: Routledge.
34. Michalko, R. 1999. The Two in One: Walking with Smokie, Walking with Blindness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
35. Norretranders, T. 1999. The User Illusion. London: Penguin.
36. Olsezweski, B. 2008. El Cuerpo del Baile: The kinetic and social fundaments of Tango. Body & Society, 14(2), 63-81.
37. Paterson, M. 2009. Haptic geographies: ethnography, haptic knowledges and sensuous dispositions. Progress in Human Geography, 33(6), 766-88.
38. Power, A 2010. The Geographies of Interdependence in the Lives of People with Intellectual Disabilities, in Towards Enabling Geographies: 'Disabled' Bodies and Minds in Society and Space, edited by V. Chouinard et al. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
39. Sennet, R. 2004. Respect: The Formation of Character in an Age of Inequality. London: Penguin.
40. Stoller, P. 1997. Sensuous Scholarship. University of Pennsylvania Press.
41. Swain J., Finkelstien, V., French, S. and Oliver, M. 2004. Disabling Barriers, Enabling Environments. London: Open University/Sage.
42. Thrift, N. 1997. The still point: Resistance, expressive embodiment and dance, in Geographies of Resistance, edited by S. Pile and M. Keith. London: Routledge, 124-51.
43. Thrift, N. 2007. Non-representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.
44. Varela, F. 1999. Ethical Know-how: Action, Wisdom and Cognition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
45. Vitalise 2007. Sighted Holiday Makers. .
46. Watson N. 2003. Daily denials: The routinisation of oppression and resistance, in Disability, Culture and Identity, edited by S. Riddell and N. Watson. Harlow, England: Pearson.
47. Weiss, G. 1999. Body Images: Embodiment as Intercorporeality. London: Routledge.
48. Whatmore, S. 2003. Generating materials, in Using Social Theory: Thinking Through Research, edited by M. Pryke, G. Rose and S. Whatmore. London: Sage.
49. Wylie, J. 2005. A single day's walking: narrating self and landscape on the South West Coast Path. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 234-37.
50. Wylie, J. 2006. Depths and folds: on landscape and the gazing subject. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 519-35.