Effects of watershed subdivision level on semi-distributed hydrological simulations: case study of the SLURP model applied to the Xiangxi River watershed, China;Effets du niveau de subdivision du bassin versant sur les simulations hydrologiques semidistribuées: Étude de cas sur le modèle SLURP appliqué au bassin versant de la rivière Xiangxi en Chine

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 108-125

  Han, Jing Cheng ^a   Huang, Guo He ^a   Zhang, Hua ^b   Li, Zhong ^b   Li, Yong Ping ^a  

^a NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

Author keywords

hydrological modelling; land type; sensitivity; sub watershed; Three Gorges Reservoir; water balance component

Indexed keywords

RESERVOIRS (WATER); RUNOFF; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATERSHEDS;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING; LAND TYPES; SENSITIVITY; SUB-WATERSHED; THREE GORGES RESERVOIR; WATER BALANCE COMPONENTS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; LAND USE CHANGE; MODEL TEST; MODEL VALIDATION; PARAMETERIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; TERRAIN; WATER BUDGET; WATERSHED;

CHINA; HUBEI; THREE GORGES RESERVOIR; XIANGXI BASIN;

EID: 84900667043     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: 21503435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2013.854368     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arabi, M., et al., 2006. Role of watershed subdivision on modeling the effectiveness of best management practices with SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42 (2), 513-528.
2. Bingner, R.L., et al., 1997. Effect of watershed subdivision on simulation runoff and fine sediment yield. Transactions of the ASAE, 40 (5), 1329-1335.
3. Chen, B., et al., 2011. Wetland monitoring, characterization and modelling under changing climate in the Canadian subarctic. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 18 (2), 55-64.
4. Cho, J., et al., 2010. Effect of watershed subdivision and filter width on SWAT simulation of a coastal plain watershed 1. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 46 (3), 586-602.
5. Cho, H. and Olivera, F., 2009. Effect of the spatial variability of land use, soil type, and precipitation on streamflows in small watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 45 (3), 673-686.
6. Dehotin, J. and Braud, I., 2008. Which spatial discretization for distributed hydrological models? Proposition of a methodology and illustration for medium to large-scale catchments. Hydrological Earth System Sciences, 12 (3), 769-796.
7. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V., 1992. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research, 28 (4), 1015-1031.
8. Efstratiadis, A., et al., 2008. HYDROGEIOS: a semi-distributed GIS-based hydrological model for modified river basins. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12 (4), 989-1006.
9. Eldrandaly, K.A. and Abu-Zaid, M.S., 2011. Comparison of six GIS-based spatial interpolation methods for estimating air temperature in western Saudi Arabia. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 18 (1), 38-45.
10. FitzHugh, T.W. and Mackay, D.S., 2000. Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. Journal of Hydrology, 236 (1-2), 35-53.
11. FitzHugh, T.W. and Mackay, D.S., 2001. Impact of sub-watershed partitioning on modeled source and transport-limited sediment yields in an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 56 (2), 137-143.
12. Gong, Y., et al., 2010. Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT modeling with consideration of parameter uncertainty. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15 (12), 1070-1074.
13. Han, J.C., et al., 2012. Fuzzy constrained optimization of eco-friendly reservoir operation using self-adaptive genetic algorithm: a case study of a cascade reservoir system in the Yalong River, China. Ecohydrology, 5 (6), 768-778.
14. Haverkamp, S., Fohrer, N., and Frede, H.G., 2005. Assessment of the effect of land use patterns on hydrologic landscape functions: a comprehensive GIS-based tool to minimize model uncertainty resulting from spatial aggregation. Hydrological Processes, 19 (3), 715-727.
15. Hayakawa, H., Uchijima, K., and Fujita, M., 1995. A study on subcatchment scale for a distributed runoff model. Environment International, 21 (5), 491-496.
16. Huang, G.H., et al., 1996. Incorporation of inexact dynamic optimization with fuzzy relation analysis for integrated climate change impact study. Journal of Environmental Management, 48 (1), 45-68.
17. Huang, G.H., et al., 1999. A hybrid GIS-supported watershed modelling system: application to the Lake Erhai basin, China. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 44 (4), 597-610.
18. Jha, M., et al., 2004. Effect of watershed subdivision on swat flow, sediment, and nutrient predictions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 40 (3), 811-825.
19. Jing, L. and Chen, B., 2011a. Field investigation and hydrological modelling of a subarctic wetland - the Deer River watershed. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 17 (1), 36-45.
20. Jing, L. and Chen, B., 2011b. Hydrological modeling of subartic wetlands: comparison between SLURP and WATFLOOD. Environmental Engineering Science, 28 (7), 521-533.
21. Kampf, S.K. and Burges, S.J., 2007. A framework for classifying and comparing distributed hillslope and catchment hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 43 (5), W05423. doi:05410.01029/02006wr005370
22. Kite, G., 1995. Scaling of input data for macroscale hydrologic modeling. Water Resources Research, 31 (11), 2769-2781.
23. Kite, G., 2001. Modelling the Mekong: hydrological simulation for environmental impact studies. Journal of Hydrology, 253 (1-4), 1-13.
24. Kite, G., Dalton, A., and Dion, K., 1994. Simulation of streamflow in a macroscale watershed using general circulation model data. Water Resources Research, 30 (5), 1547-1559.
25. Kite, G.W., Danard, M., and Li, B., 1998. Simulating long series of streamflow using data from an atmospheric model. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 43 (3), 391-407.
26. Kite, G. and Kouwen, N., 1992. Watershed modeling using land classifications. Water Resources Research, 28 (12), 3193-3200.
27. Kumar, S. and Merwade, V., 2009. Impact of watershed subdivision and soil data resolution on SWAT model calibration and parameter uncertainty. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 45 (5), 1179-1196.
28. Lacroix, M.P., et al., 2002. Using digital terrain analysis modeling techniques for the parameterization of a hydrologic model. Environmental Modelling and Software, 17 (2), 125-134.
29. Li, Y.P., Huang, G.H., and Sun, W., 2011. Management of uncertain information for environmental systems using a multistage fuzzy-stochastic programming model with soft constraints. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 18 (1), 28-37.
30. Liu, Y.Q. and Gupta, H.V., 2007. Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: toward an integrated data assimilation framework. Water Resources Research, 43 (7), W07401. doi:07410.01029/02006WR005756
31. Mao, X.F., Yang, Z.F., and Chen, B., 2011. Network analysis and comparative studies on Baiyangdian and Okefenokee wetland systems in China and US. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 18 (2), 46-54.
32. Morton, F.I., 1983. Operational estimates of areal evapotranspiration and their significance to the science and practice of hydrology. Journal of Hydrology, 66 (1-4), 1-76.
33. Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I-a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282-290.
34. Norris, G. and Haan, C.T., 1992. Impact of subdividing watersheds on estimated hydrographs. Transaction of the ASAE, 9 (5), 443-445.
35. Orlandini, S. and Moretti, G., 2009. Determination of surface flow paths from gridded elevation data. Water Resources Research, 45 (3), W03417. doi:10.1029/2008WR007099.
36. Qin, X.S., et al., 2007. An interval-parameter fuzzy nonlinear optimization model for stream water quality management under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 180 (3), 1331-1357.
37. Su, M., Stolte, W.J., and van der Kamp, G., 2000. Modelling Canadian prairie wetland hydrology using a semi-distributed streamflow model. Hydrological Processes, 14 (14), 2405-2422.
38. Sulis, M., Paniconi, C., and Camporese, M., 2011. Impact of grid resolution on the integrated and distributed response of a coupled surface-subsurface hydrological model for the des Anglais catchment, Quebec. Hydrological Processes, 25 (12), 1853-1865.
39. Susilo, G. E., 2002. Effect of aggregated simulation area scale in watershed simulation using the SLURP model. Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Montreal.
40. Thorne, R., 2010. Uncertainty in the impacts of projected climate change on the hydrology of a subarctic environment: liard River Basin. Hydrology Earth System Science Discussion, 7 (3), 3129-3157.
41. Thorne, R. and Woo, M.K., 2006. Efficacy of a hydrologic model in simulating discharge from a large mountainous catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 330 (1-2), 301-312.
42. Tripathi, M.P., Raghuwanshi, N.S., and Rao, G.P., 2006. Effect of watershed subdivision on simulation of water balance components. Hydrological Processes, 20 (5), 1137-1156.
43. van der Linden, S. and Woo, M.K., 2003. Transferability of hydrological model parameters between basins in data-sparse areas, subarctic Canada. Journal of Hydrology, 270 (3-4), 182-194.
44. Wang, X., et al., 2011. Simulating hydrologic effects of raised roads within a low-relief watershed. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 16 (7), 585-597.
45. Wise, S.M., 2007. Effect of differing DEM creation methods on the results from a hydrological model. Computers and Geosciences, 33 (10), 1351-1365.
46. Woo, M.K. and Thorne, R., 2006. Snowmelt contribution to discharge from a large mountainous catchment in subarctic Canada. Hydrological Processes, 20 (10), 2129-2139.
47. Zhang, H., et al., 2011. Uncertainty assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology of small prairie wetlands. Journal of Hydrology, 396 (1-2), 94-103.
48. Zhang, H., et al., 2012. An integrated multi-level watershed-reservoir modeling system for examining hydrological and biogeochemical processes in small prairie watersheds. Water Research, 46 (4), 1207-1224.
49. Zhang, H. and Huang, G., 2009. Building channel networks for flat regions in digital elevation models. Hydrological Processes, 23 (20), 2879-2887.
50. Zheng, C., Yang, W., and Yang, Z.F., 2011. Strategies for managing environmental flows based on the spatial distribution of water quality: a case study of Baiyangdian Lake, China. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 18 (2), 84-90.