Query log analysis in biomedicine

Handbook of Research on Web Log Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 359-377

  Bernstam, Elmer V ^a   Herskovic, Jorge R ^a   Hersh, William R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900646104     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-974-8.ch018     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. About the National Library of Medicine. (2007). Retrieved September 9, 2007, from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/about/index.html
2. Annals of Family Medicine Selected for Indexing in Index Medicus and MEDLINE. (2004). Retrieved September 9, 2007, from http://www.aafp.org/annals/x28117.html
3. Anonymous. (2004, 08/08/2006). Searching PubMed. PubMed Help Retrieved 09/25/2006, 2006, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=helppubmed.section.pubmedhelp.Searching_PubMed#pubmedhelp.Combining_search_ter
4. Biermann, J. S., Golladay, G. J., Greenfield, M. L., & Baker, L. H. (1999). Evaluation of cancer information on the Internet. Cancer, 86(3), 381-390.
5. Brennan, P. F., & Aronson, A. R. (2003). Towards linking patients and clinical information: detecting UMLS concepts in e-mail. J Biomed Inform, 36(4-5), 334-341.
6. Broder, A. (2002). A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum, 36(2), 3-10.
7. Budanitsky, A., & Hirst, G. (2001). Semantic distance inWordNet: An experimental, applica-tion-oriented evaluation of five measures. Paper presented at the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/budanitsky01semantic.html
8. Cooper, M. C. (2000). Semantic distance measures. Computational Intelligence, 16(1), 79-94.
9. Crocco, A. G., Villasis-Keever, M., & Jadad, A. R. (2002). Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the Internet. JAMA, 287, 2869-2871.
10. de Keizer, N. F., Abu-Hanna, A., & Zwetsloot-Schonk, J. H. (2000). Understanding terminological systems. I: Terminology and typology. Methods Inf Med, 39(1), 16-21.
11. Eisenberg, D. M., Kessler, R. C., Rompay, M. I. V., Kaptchuk, T. J., Wilkey, S. A., Appel, S., et al. (2001). Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey. Annals of Internal Medicine, 135(5), 344-351.
12. Eysenbach, G., & Kohler, C. (2004). Health-related searches on the Internet. Jama, 291(24), 2946.
13. Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Kuss, O., & Sa, E. R. (2002). Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA, 287(20), 2691-2700.
14. Fox, S., & Rainie, L. (2000). The online healthcare revolution: How the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Washington DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project: Onlineo. Document Number)
15. Fox, S., & Rainie, L. (2002). Vital decisions: how internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Projecto. Document Number)
16. Funk, M. E., & Reid, C. A. (1983). Indexing consistency in MEDLINE. Bull Med Libr Assoc, 71(2), 176-183.
17. Gay, C. W., Kayaalp, M., & Aronson, A. R. (2005). Semi-automatic indexing of full text biomedical articles. Paper presented at the AMIA Annu Symp Proc.
18. Grimes, C., Tang, D., & Russell, D. M. (2007, May 8-12, 2007). Query logs alone are not enough. Paper presented at the WWW 2007, Banff, Canada.
19. Haynes, R. B. (2001). Of studies, syntheses, synopses, and systems: the "4S" evolution of services for finding current best evidence. ACP J Club, 134(2), A11-13.
20. Helft, P. R., Hlubocky, F. J., Gordon, E. J., Ratain, M. J., & Daugherty, C. (2000, 2000). Hope and the media in advanced cancer patients. Paper presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 36th annual meeting, New Orleans, LA.
21. Hersh, W., & Hickam, D. (1994). Use of a multi-application computer workstation in a clinical setting. Bull Med Libr Assoc, 82(4), 382-389.
22. Hersh, W. R., & Hickam, D. H. (1998). How well do physicians use electronic information retrieval systems? A framework for investigation and systematic review. Jama, 280(15), 1347-1352.
23. Herskovic, J. R., Tanaka, L. Y., Hersh, W., & Ber-nstam, E. V. (2007). A day in the life of PubMed: analysis of a typical day's query log. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 14(2), 212-220.
24. Jadad, A. R., & Gagliardi, A. (1998). Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA, 279(8), 611-614.
25. Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (2000). Real Life, Real Users, and Real Needs: A Study and Analysis of User Queries on the Web Information Processing and Management, 36(2), 207-227.
26. Lacroix, E.-M. (2000). Expanding world access to health literature. Paper presented at the 8th International congress on Medical Librarianship, London.
27. Lacroix, E.-M., & Mehnert, R. (2002). The US National Library of Medicine in the 21st century: expanding collections, nontraditional formats, new audiences. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 19(3), 126-132.
28. McCray, A. T., Loane, R. F., Browne, A. C., & Bangalore, A. K. (1999). Terminology issues in user access to Web-based medical information. Proc AMIA Symp, 107-111.
29. Nakashima, E. (2006, August 8, 2006). AOL takes down site with users' search data. Washington Post, p. D01, from http://www.washing-tonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/07/AR2006080701150.html
30. Paik, S., Shak, S., Tang, G., Kim, C., Baker, J., Cronin, M., et al. (2004). A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 351(27), 2817-2826.
31. Price, S. L., & Hersh, W. R. (1999). Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Symp, 911-915.
32. Resource statistics. (2007). Retrieved May 15, 2007, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/About/tools/restable_stat_pubmeddata.htm
33. Robinson, A., & Thomson, R. (2001). Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Healthcare, 10 Suppl 1, i34-38.
34. Robinson, J. C. (2001). The end of managed care. JAMA, 285(20), 2622-2628.
35. Silverstein, C., Henzinger, M., Marais, H., & Moricz, M. (1998). Analysis of a Very Large AltaVista Query Log (Technical Note No. SRC Technical Note 1998-014): Digital Equipment Corporationo. Document Number)
36. Slawson, D. C., & Shaughnessy, A. F. (2005). Teaching evidence-based medicine: should we be teaching information management instead? Acad Med, 80(7), 685-689.
37. Smith, C. A., Stavri, P. Z., & Chapman, W. W. (2002). In their own words? A terminological analysis of e-mail to a cancer information service. Proc AMIA Symp, 697-701.
38. Strasberg, H. R., Hubbs, P. R., Rindfleisch, T. C., & Melmon, K. L. (1999). Analysis of information needs of users of the Stanford Health Information Network for Education. Proc AMIA Symp, 965-969.
39. U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2005, May 27). MeSH Fact Sheet. Retrieved March 30, 2007, from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/intro_pref-ace2007.html#pref_hist
40. U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2006a, May 27). Citation Maintenance Tasks in XML format. Retrieved April 5, 2007, from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/gcmdoc2007.html
41. U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2006b, November 27). MeSH history. Retrieved March 30, 2007, from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/in-tro_preface2007.html#pref_hist
42. Walji, M., Sagaram, S., Sagaram, D., Meric-Ber-nstam, F., Johnson, C., Mirza, N. Q., et al. (2004). Efficacy of quality criteria to identify potentially harmful information: a cross-sectional survey of complementary and alternative medicine web sites. J Med Internet Res, 6(2), e21.
43. Zeng, Q., Kogan, S., Ash, N., Greenes, R. A., & Boxwala, A. A. (2002). Characteristics of consumer terminology for health information retrieval. Methods Inf Med, 41(4), 289-298.