Sensory neuroscience: Four laws of psychophysics

Sensory Neuroscience: Four Laws of Psychophysics

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-170

  Zwislocki, Jozef J ^a  

^a Syracuse University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900585612     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-84849-5     Document Type: Book

References (143)

1. Atteneave, F. Perception and related areas. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A Study of a Science 4 (pp. 619-659). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
2. Barlow, R.B. Brightness sensation and pupil reflex in normals, rod monochromats, and patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Adv. Ophthalmol. 41: 149-216, 1980.
3. Barlow, R.B., and Verrillo, R.T. Brightness sensation in a ganzfeld. Vision Res. 16: 1291-1297, 1975.
4. Bernoulli, D. Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Originally published in Latin in 1738. Translation in Econometrica 22, 23-35, 1954.
5. Bolanowski, S.J., Jr., Zwislocki, J.J., and Gescheider, G.A. Ratio Scaling of Psychological Magnitude: In Honor of the Memory of S.S. Stevens. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991.
6. Borg, G., Diamant, H., Ström, L., and Zotterman, Y. The relation between neural and perceptual intensity: A comparative study on the neural and psychophysical response to taste stimuli. J. Physiol. 192: 13-20, 1967.
7. Cain, W.S. Odor intensity: Differences in the exponent of the psychophysical function. Percept. Psychophys. 6(6a): 349-354, 1969.
8. Chatterjee, M., and Zwislocki, J.J. Cochlear mechanisms of frequency and intensity coding. II. Dynamic range and the code for loudness. Hear. Res. 124: 170-181, 1998.
9. Churcher, B.G. A loudness scale for industrial noise measurement. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 6: 216-226, 1935.
10. Collins, A.A., and Gescheider, G.A. The measurement of loudness in children and adults by absolute magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85: 2012-2021, 1989.
11. Delboeuf, J. Etude psychologique. Recherches théoriques et expérimentales sur la mesure des sensations et spécialement des sensations de lumière et de fatigue. Brussels, 1873.
12. Ekman, G. Is the power law a special case of Fechner's law? Percept. Mot. Skills 19: 730, 1964.
13. Fechner, G.T. Elemente der Psychophysik, 1860. Vol. I available in English translation as Elements of Psychophysics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.
14. Fletcher, H. Auditory patterns. Rev. Mod. Physics 12: 47-65, 1940.
15. Fletcher, H., and Munson, W.A. Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 5, 82-108, 1933.
16. Gescheider, G.A. Psychophysics: The Fundamentals (Third Edition). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
17. Gescheider, G.A., and Hughson, B.A. Stimulus context and absolute magnitude estimation: A study of individual differences. Percept. Psychophys. 50: 45-57, 1991.
18. Hartline, H.K., and Graham, C.H. Nerve impulses from single receptors in the eye. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 1: 277-295, 1932.
19. Hellman, R.P. On some factors affecting loudness as a function of intensity. Master's thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, 1960.
20. Hellman, R.P., and Meiselman, C.H. Prediction of individual loudness functions from crossmodality matching. J. Speech Hear. Res. 31: 605-615, 1988.
21. Hellman, R.P., and Meiselman, C.H. Loudness relations for individuals and groups in normal and impaired hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88(6): 2596-2606, 1990.
22. Hellman, R.P., and Meiselman, C.H. Rate of loudness growth for pure tones in normal and impaired hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93(2): 966-975, 1993.
23. Hellman, R.P., and Zwislocki, J.J. Some factors affecting the estimation of loudness. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 33(5): 687-694, 1961.
24. Hellman, R.P., and Zwislocki, J.J. Monaural loudness function T 1000 cps and interaural summation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35(6): 856-865, 1963.
25. Hellman, R.P., and Zwislocki, J.J. Loudness function of a 1000-cps tone in the presence of a masking noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36(9): 1618-1627, 1964.
26. Hellman, R.P., and Zwislocki, J.J. Loudness determination at low sound frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43(1): 60-64, 1968.
27. James, W. Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt, 1890.
28. Jastrow, J. The psycho-physic law and star magnitude. Am. J. Psychol. 1: 112-127, 1887.
29. Levelt, W.J.M., Riemersma, J.B., and Bunt, A. Binaural additivity of loudness. Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 25: 51-68, 1972.
30. Luce, R.D., and Tukey, J.W. Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. J. Math. Psychol. 1: 1-27, 1964.
31. MacKay, D.M. Psychophysics of perceived intensity: A theoretical basis for Fechner's and Stevens' laws. Science 139: 1213-1216, 1963.
32. Mansfield, R.J.W. Brightness function: Effects of area and duration. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63: 913-920, 1973.
33. Marks, L.E. Sensory Processes: The New Psychophysics. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
34. Marks, L.E. Binaural summation of the loudness of pure tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64: 107-113, 1978.
35. Marks, L.E. Magnitude estimation and sensory matching. Percept. Psychophys. 43(6): 511-525, 1988.
36. Marks, L.E. Reliability of magnitude matching. Percept. Psychophys. 49: 31-37, 1991.
37. Matthews, B.H.C. The response of a single end organ. J. Physiol. 71: 64-110, 1931.
38. McKay, D.M. Psychophysics of perceived intensity: A theoretical basis for Fechner's and Steven's laws. Science 139: 1213-1216, 1963.
39. Moskowitz, H.R. Ratio scales of sugar sweetness. Percept. Psychophys. 7(5): 315-320, 1970.
40. Moskowitz, H.R. Intensity scales for pure tastes and for taste mixtures. Percept. Psychophys. 9(1a): 51-56, 1971a.
41. Moskowitz, H.R. The sweetness and pleasantness of sugars. Am. J. Psychol. 84(3): 387-405, 1971b.
42. Newman, E.B. The validity of the just noticeable difference as a unit of psychological magnitude. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 36: 172-175, 1933.
43. Richardson, L.F., and Ross, J.S. Loudness and telephone current. J. Gen. Psychol. 3: 288-306, 1930.
44. Ruggero, M.A., Rich, N.C., Recio, A., Narayan, S.S., and Robles, L. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101(4): 2151-2163, 1997.
45. Sato, M. Neural coding in taste as seen from recordings from peripheral receptors and nerves. In L. M. Beidler (Ed.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology: Chemical Senses, Taste (Vol. 2, pp. 116-147). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1971.
46. Schmidt, J.M., and Smith, J.J.B. Short interval time measurement by a parasitoid wasp. Science, 237: 903-905, 1987.
47. Shepard, R.N. On the status of "direct" psychological measurement. In C.W. Savage (Ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 9, pp. 441-490). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1978.
48. Stevens, J.C. A comparison of ratio scales for the loudness of white noise and the brightness of white light. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1957.
49. Stevens, J.C., and Mack, J.D. Scales of apparent force. J. Exp. Psychol. 58: 405-413, 1959.
50. Stevens, J.C., and Marks, L.E. Spatial summation and the dynamics of warmth sensation. Percept. Psychophys. 9: 291-298, 1971.
51. Stevens, J.C., Mack, J.D., and Stevens, S.S. Growth of sensation on seven continua as measured by force of handgrip. J. Exp. Psychol. 59: 60-67, 1960.
52. Stevens, S.S. A scale for the measurement of a psychological magnitude: Loudness. Psychol. Rev. 43: 405-416, 1936.
53. Stevens, S.S. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103: 677-680, 1946.
54. Stevens, S.S. Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951.
55. Stevens, S.S. On the brightness of lights and the loudness of sounds [Abstract]. Science 118: 576, 1953.
56. Stevens, S.S. The measurement of loudness. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27: 815-820, 1955.
57. Stevens, S.S. The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes-loudness. Am. J. Psychol. 69:1-25, 1956.
58. Stevens, S.S. Problems and methods of psychophysics. Psychol. Bull. 55: 177-196, 1958.
59. Stevens, S.S. Cross-modality validations of subjective scales for loudness, vibrations, and electric shock. J. Exp. Psychol. 57: 201-209, 1959.
60. Stevens, S.S. On the new psychophysics. Scand. J. Psychol. 1: 27-35, 1960.
61. Stevens, S.S. Matching functions between loudness and ten other continua. Percept. Psychophys. 1: 5-8, 1966.
62. Stevens, S.S. Psychophysics: Introduction to its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Prospects. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1975.
63. Stevens, S.S., and Greenbaum, H.B. Regression effect in psychophysical judgment. Percept. Psychophys. 1: 439-446, 1966.
64. Stevens, S.S., and Guirao, M. Loudness, reciprocity, and partition scales. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34: 1466-1471, 1962.
65. Teas, D.C., Eldredge, D.H., and Davis, H. Cochlear responses to acoustic transients: An interpretation of whole-nerve action potentials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34: 1438-1459, 1962.
66. Teghtsoonian, M., and Beckwith, J.B. Children's size judgments when size and distance vary. Is there a developmental trend to overconsistency? J. Exp. Child Psychol. 22: 23-39, 1976.
67. Treisman, M. Sensory scaling and the psychophysical law. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 16: 11-22, 1964.
68. Verrillo, R.T. Effect of contractor area in the vibrotactile threshold. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35: 1962-1966, 1963.
69. Verrillo, R.T. Comparison of vibrotactile threshold and suprathreshold responses in men and women. Percept. Psychophys. 26: 20-24, 1979a.
70. Verrillo, R.T. Change in vibrotactile thresholds as a function of age. Sens. Processes 3: 49-59, 1979b.
71. Verrillo, R.T. Absolute estimation of line length in three age groups. J. Gerontol. 36:625-627, 1981.
72. Verrillo, R.T. Stability of line-length estimates using the method of absolute magnitude estimation. Percept. Psychophys. 33: 261-265, 1983.
73. Verrillo, R.T., Fraioli, A., and Smith, R.L. Sensory magnitude of vibrotactile stimuli. Percept. Psychophys. 6: 366-372, 1969.
74. Verrillo, R.T., and Irvin, G. Absolute estimation of line length as a function of orientation and contrast polarity. Sens. Processes 3: 261-274, 1979.
75. Weber, E.H. De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu: Annotationes anatomicae et physiologicae. Leipzig: Koehler, 1834.
76. Zinnes, J.L. Scaling. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 20: 447-478, 1969.
77. Zotterman, Y. The recording of the neural response from human taste nerves. In L.M. Beidler (Ed.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology: Chemical Senses, Taste (Vol. 2, pp. 102-115). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1971.
78. Zwislocki, J.J. A power function for sensory receptors. In H.R. Moskowitz, B. Scharf, & J.C. Stevens (Eds.), Sensation and Measurements. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel, 1974.
79. Zwislocki, J.J. Group and individual relations between sensation magnitudes and their numerical estimates. Percept. Psychophys. 33: 460-468, 1983.
80. Zwislocki, J.J. Natural Measurement. In S.J. Bolanowski, Jr. & G.A. Gescheider (Eds.), Ratio Scaling of Psychological Magnitude: In Honor of the Memory of S.S. Stevens (pp. 19-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991.
81. Zwislocki, J.J. Auditory system: Peripheral nonlinearity and central additivity, as revealed in the human stapedius-muscle reflex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(22): 14601-14606, 2002.
82. Zwislocki, J.J. A look at neural integration in the human auditory system through the stapedius muscle reflex. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 100(5): 9073-9078, 2003.
83. Zwislocki, J.J., and Goodman, D.A. Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: A validation. Percept. Psychophys. 28(1): 28-38, 1980.
84. Zwislocki, J.J., Damianopoulos, E.N., Buining, E., and Glantz, J. Central masking: Some steadystates and transient effects. Percept. Psychophys. 2: 59-64, 1967.
85. Barlow, R.B. and Verrillo, R.T. (1976). Brightness sensation in a ganzfeld. Vision Research, 16; 1291-1297.
86. Bartoshuk, L.M. and Cleveland, C.T. (1977). Mixtures of substances with similar tastes: A test of a physiological model of taste mixture interactions. Sensory Processes, 1; 177-186.
87. Bolanowski, S.J. (1987). Contourless stimuli produce binocular brightness summation. Vision Research, 27(11); 1943-1951.
88. Bolanowski, S.J., Checkowsky, C.M., and Wegenack, T.M. (1993). And now, for our two senses. In: Sensory Research: Multimodal Perspectives. R.T. Verrillo (Ed.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 211-231.
89. Burglund, B. and Olsson, M.J. (1993). Odor-intensity interaction in binary and ternary mixtures. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(5); 475-482.
90. Cain, W.S. (1977). Bilateral interaction in olfaction. Nature, 268; 50-52.
91. Caussé, R. and Chavasse, P. (1942). Différence entre l'écoute binauriculaire et monauriculaire pour la perception des intensitiés supraliminaire. Comptes Rendus de la Societe de Biologie, 136; 405-406.
92. Fletcher, H. (1929). Speech and Hearing. D. Van Nostrand Co., New York.
93. Fletcher, H. (1935). Newer concepts of the pitch, the loudness and the timbre of musical tones. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 220; 405-429.
94. Fletcher, H. and Munson, W.A. (1933). Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 5; 82-108.
95. Hellman, R.P. and Zwislocki, J.J. (1961). Some factors affecting the estimation of loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33; 687.
96. Hellman, R.P. and Zwislocki, J.J. (1963). Monaural loudness function at 1000 cps ans interaural summation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35(6); 856-865.
97. Hellman, R.P. and Zwislocki, J.J. (1968). Loudness determination at low sound frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 43(1); 60-64.
98. Levelt, W.J.M., Riemersma, J.B., and Bunt, A.A. (1972). Binaural additivity of loudness. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25; 51-68.
99. Luce, R.D. and Tukey, J.W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1; 1-27.
100. Marks, L.E. (1978). Binaural summation of the loudness of pure tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64(1); 107-113.
101. Marks, L.E. (1979). Summation of vibrotactile intensity: An analog to auditory critical bands? Sensory Processes, 3; 188-203.
102. Marks, L.E., Algom, D., and Benoit, J.-P. (1991). Dichotic summation of loudness with small frequency separations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29(1); 62-64.
103. Moskowitz, H.R. (1973). Models of sweetness additivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99(1); 88-98.
104. Scharf, B. and Fishkin, D. (1970). Binaural summation of loudness reconsidered. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86; 374-379.
105. Shaw, W.A., Newman, E.B., and Hirsh, I.J. (1947). The difference between monaural and binaural thresholds. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37; 229-242.
106. Stevens, S.S. and Davis, H. (1938). Hearing, It's Psychology and Physiology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
107. Verrillo, R.T. (1968). A duplex mechanism of mechanoreception. In: The Skin Senses. D.R. Kenshalo (Ed.), C.C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp. 139-159.
108. Verrillo, R.T. and Gesheider, G.A. (1975). Enhancement and summation in the perception of two successive vibrotactile stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 18; 128-136.
109. Zwicker, E., Flottorp, G., and Stevens, S.S. (1957). Critical bandwidth in loudness summation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29; 548-557.
110. Zwislocki, J.J. (1983). Group and individual relations between sensation magnitudes and their numerical estimates. Perception & Psychophysics, 33; 460-468.
111. Zwislocki, J.J., Ketkar, I., Cannon, M.W., and Nodar, R.H. (1974). Loudness enhancement and summation in pairs or short sound bursts. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1); 91-95.
112. Zwislocki, J.J. and Sokolich,W.G. (1974). On loudness enhancement of a tone burst by a preceding tone burst. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1); 87-90.
113. Cefaratti, L.K. and Zwislocki, J.J. (1994). Relationships between the variability of magnitude matching and the slope of magnitude level functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96(1); 126-133.
114. Doerfler, L.G. (1948). Differential sensitivity to intensity in the perceptually deafened ear. Ph.D. Dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
115. Engen, T. (1972). Psychophysics I: Discrimination and detection. In: J.W. Kling and L.A. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth & Schlosberg's Experimental Psychology, 3rd Edition: Vol. 1, Sensation and Perception. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 11-46.
116. Gescheider, G.A., Bolanowski, S.J., Verrillo, R., Arpajian, D.J., and Ryan, T.F. (1990). Vibrotactile intensity discrimination measured by three methods. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87(1); 330-338.
117. Gescheider, G.A., Bolanowski, S.J., Zwislocki, J.J., Hall, K.L., and Mascia, C. (1994). The effects of masking on the growth of vibrotactile sensation magnitude and on the amplitude difference limen: A test of the equal sensation magnitude-equal difference limen hypothesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96(3); 1479-1488.
118. Hecht, S. (1934). Vision II. The nature of the photoreceptor process. In: C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of General Experimental Psychology. Clark University Press, Worchester.
119. Hellman, R., Scharf, B., Teghtsoonian, M., and Teghtsoonian, R. (1987). On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82(2); 448-453.
120. Jesteadt, W. (1980). An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 28(1); 85-88.
121. Jesteadt, W., Wier, C.G., and Green, D.M. (1977). Intensity discrimination as a function of frquency and sensation level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61; 169-177.
122. Johnson, J.H., Turner, C.W., Zwislocki, J.J., and Margolis, R.H. (1993). Just noticeable differences for intensity and their relation to loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93(2); 983-991.
123. Jordan, H.N. (1962). An investigation of the validity and reliability of the Lüscher-Zwislocki test of loudness recruitment. Ph.D. Dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
124. König, A. and Brodhun, E. (1889). Experimentelle Untersuchungen ueber die psychophysische Fundamentalformel in Bezug auf den Gesichtssinn. Sitzungsberichte Preussische Akademie Wissenschhaften 27; 641-644.
125. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49; 467-477.
126. Licklider, J.C.R. (1951). Basic correlates of the auditory stimulus. In: S.S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology. Wiley, New York, pp. 985-1039.
127. Lüscher, E. and Zwislocki, J.J. (1948). A simple method for indirect monaural determination of the recruitment phenomenon. Acta Otolaryngologica Supplement 78; 156-168.
128. Lüscher E. and Zwislocki, J.J. (1951). Comparison of the various methods employed in the determination of the recruitment phenomenon. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 65; 187-195.
129. McGill, W.J. and Goldberg, J.P. (1968). Pure-tone intensity discrimination and energy detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 44; 576-581.
130. Miller, G.A. (1947). Sensitivity to changes in the intensity of white noise and its relation to masking and loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 19; 609-619.
131. Ozimek, E. and Zwislocki, J. J. (1996). Relationships of intensity discrimination to sensation and loudness levels: Dependence on sound frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100; 3304-3320.
132. Penner, M.J., Leshowitz, B., Cudahy, E., and Richards G. (1974). Intensity discrimination for pulsed sinusoids of various frequencies. Perception and Psychophysics 15; 568-570.
133. Riesz, R.R. (1928). Differential sensitivity of the ear for pure tones. Physics Review 31; 867-875.
134. Riggs, L.A. (1972). Vision. In: J.W. Kling and L.A. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth & Schlosberg's Experimental Psychology, 3rd Edition: Vol. 1, Sensation and Perception. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 273-314.
135. Schacknow, P.N. and Raab, D.H. (1973). Intensity discrimination of tone bursts and the form of the Weber function. Perception and Psychophysics 14; 449-450.
136. Stellmack, M.A., Viemeister, N.F., and Byrne, A.J. (2004). Monaural and interaural intensity discrimination: Level effects and the "binaural advantage." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(2); 1149-1159.
137. Stillman, J.A., Zwislocki, J.J., Zhang, M., and Cefaratti, L.K. (1993). Intensity just-noticeable differences at equal-loudness levels in normal and pathological ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93(1); 425-434.
138. Turner, C.W., Zwislocki, J.J., and Filion, P.R. (1989). Intensity discrimination determined with two paradigms in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86(1); 109-115.
139. Zwislocki, J.J. (1996a). A theory for intensity jnds and the variability of subjective magnitude matches. In: U. Jorasz, (Ed.), Auditory Perception: Principles and Applications. World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore.
140. Zwislocki, J.J. (1996b). Cochlear mechanisms underlying loudness recruitment and the half-octave shift in cochlear noise damage. Central & East European Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery 1, 6-18, 1996.
141. Zwislocki, J.J. and Jordan, H.N. (1986). On the relations of intensity jnds to loudness and neural noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79(3); 772-780.
142. Zwislocki, J.J. and Relkin, E.M. (2001). On a psychological transformed-rule up and down method converging on a 75% level of correct responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 98(8); 4811-4814.
143. Zwislocki, J.J., Maire, F., Feldman, A.S., and Rubin, H. (1958). On the effect of practice and motivation on the threshold of audibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 30; 254-262.