Interaction models and relevance feedback in image retrieval

Semantic-Based Visual Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 160-186

  Heesch, Daniel ^a   Rüger, Stefan ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900573007     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-370-8.ch008     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Aggarwal, G., Ashwin, T., & Ghosal, S. (2002). An image retrieval system with automatic query modification. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 4(2), 201-213.
2. Campbell, I. (2000). The ostensive model of developing information-needs [doctoral thesis]. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow.
3. Chen, C., Gagaudakis, G., & Rosin, P. (2000). Similarity-based image browsing. In Proceedings of the IFIP World Computer Congress, Beijing, China.
4. Chen, J.-Y., Bouman, C., & Dalton, J. (2000). Hierarchical browsing and search of large image databases. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 9(3).
5. Chen, Y., Zhou, X., & Huang, T. (2001). One-class SVM for learning in image retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, Thessaloniki, Greece.
6. Cohn, D., Atlas, L., & Ladner, R. (1994). Improving generalization with active learning. Machine Learning, 15(2), 201-221.
7. Cox, I., Miller, M., Minka, T., Papathomas, T., & Yianilos, P. (2000). The Bayesian image retrieval system, PicHunter: Theory, implementation, and psychophysical experiments. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 9(1), 20-38.
8. Cox, I., Miller, M., Omohundro, S., & Yianilos, P. (1998). An optimized interaction strategy for Bayesian relevance feedback. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Santa Barbara, CA.
9. Cox, K. (1992). Information retrieval by browsing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Information Technology, Hong Kong.
10. Cox, K. (1995). Searching through browsing [doctoral thesis]. Canberra, Australia: University of Canberra.
11. Croft, B., & Parenty, T. (1985). Comparison of a network structure and a database system used for document retrieval. Information Systems, 10, 377-390.
12. Crucianu, M., Ferecatu, M., & Boujemaa, N. (2004). Relevance feedback for image retrieval: A short survey. In State of the art in audiovisual content-based retrieval, information universal access and interaction including datamodels and languages (DELOS2 Report [FP6 NoE]).
13. Dearholt, D., & Schvaneveldt, R. (1990). Properties of pathfinder networks. In R. Schvaneveldt (Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ.
14. Duda, R., Hart, P., & Stork, D. (2001). Pattern recognition. New York: Wiley.
15. Fagin, R., Kumar, R., & Sivakumar, D. (2003). Efficient similarity search and classification via rank aggregation. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Management of Data, San Diego, CA.
16. Feng, S., Manmatha, R., & Lavrenko, V. (2004). Multiple Bernoulli relevance models for image and video annotation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cambridge, UK.
17. He, J., Tong, H., Li, M., Zhang, H.-J., & Zhang, C. (2004). Mean version space: A new active learning method for content-based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval in Conjunction with ACM Multimedia, New York.
18. He, X., Ma, W.-Y., & Zhang, H.-J. (2004). Learning an image manifold for retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia, New York.
19. k technique for image searching and browsing [doctoral thesis]. London: Imperial College London.
20. Heesch, D., Pickering, M., Yavlinsky, A., & Rüger, S. (2003). Video retrieval within a browsing framework using keyframes. In Proceedings of the TREC Video Retrieval Evaluation, Gaithersburg.
21. Heesch, D., & Rüger, S. (2002). Combining features for content-based sketch retrieval-A comparative evaluation of retrieval performance. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Retrieval, Glasgow, UK.
22. Heesch, D., & Rüger, S. (2003). Performance boosting with three mouse clicks-relevance feedback for CBIR. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Retrieval, Pisa, Italy.
23. k Networks for content-based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Retrieval, Sunderland, UK.
24. k Networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, Dublin, Ireland.
25. Hong, P., Tian, Q., & Huang, T. (2000). Incorporate support vector machines to contentbased image retrieval with relevant feedback. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Vancouver, Canada.
26. Ishikawa, Y., Subramanya, R., & Faloutsos, C. (1998). Mindreader: Querying databases through multiple examples. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, New York.
27. Jing, F., Li, M., Zhang, L., Zhang, H.-J., & Zhang, B. (2003). Learning in region-based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Bangkok, Thailand.
28. Kim, D.-H., & Chung, C.-W. (2003). Qcluster: Relevance feedback using adaptive clustering for content-based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Madison, WA.
29. Kohonen, T. (2001). Self-organizing maps (Vol. 30). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
30. Kruskal, J. (1964). Multi-dimensional scaling by optimizing goodness-of-fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1-27.
31. Lavrenko, V., Manmatha, R., & Jeon, J. (2003). A model for learning the semantics of pictures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Whistler, Canada.
32. Lim, J., Wu, J., Singh, S., & Narasimhalu, D. (2001). Learning similarity matching in multimedia content-based retrieval. IEEE Transactions Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13(5), 846-850.
33. Meilhac, C., & Nastar, C. (1999). Relevance feedback and category search in image databases. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Communications Systems, Florence, Italy.
34. Müller, H., Marchand-Maillet, S., & Pun, T. (2002). The truth about Corel-evaluation in image retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, London.
35. Müller, H., Müller, W., Squire, D., Marchand-Maillet, S., & Pun, T. (2000). Strategies for positive and negative relevance feedback in image retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, Spain.
36. Nastar, C., Mitschke, M., & Meilhac, C. (1998). Efficient query refinement for image retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Santa Barbara, CA.
37. Pecenovic, Z., Do, M., Vetterli, M., & Pu, P. (2000). Integrated browsing and searching of large image collections. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Visual Information Systems, Lyon, France.
38. Peng, J., Bhanu, B., & Qing, S. (1999). Probabilistic feature relevance learning for content-based image retrieval. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 75(12), 150-164.
39. Porkaew, K., Chakrabarti, K., & Mehrotra, S. (1999). Query refinement for multimedia similarity retrieval in Mars. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Orlando, FL.
40. Rocchio, J. (1971). The SMART retrieval system. Experiments in automatic document processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41. Rubner, Y., Guibas, L., & Tomasi, C. (1997). The earth mover's distance, multi-dimensional scaling, and color-based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, New Orleans, LA.
42. Rui, Y., & Huang, T. (2000). Optimizing learning in image retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Hilton Head Island, SC.
43. Rui, Y., Huang, T., & Mehrotra, S. (1997). Content-based image retrieval with relevance feedback in Mars. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Washington, DC.
44. Rui, Y., Huang, T., Ortega, M., & Mehrotra, S. (1998). Relevance feedback: A power tool for interactive content-based image retrieval. IEEE Transactions Circuits and Video Technology, 8(5), 644-655.
45. Salton, G., & McGill, M. (1982). Introduction to modern information retrieval. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
46. Santini, S., Gupta, A., & Jain, R. (2001). Emergent semantics through interaction in image databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13(3), 337-351.
47. Santini, S., & Jain, R. (2000). Integrated browsing and querying for image databases. IEEE MultiMedia, 7(3), 26-39.
48. Schettini, R., Ciocca, G., & Gagliardi, I. (1999). Content-based color image retrieval with relevance feedback. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, Kobe, Japan.
49. Sclaroff, S., Taycher, L., & La Cascia, M. (1997). ImageRover: A content-based image browser for the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Libraries, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
50. Tong, S., & Chang, E. (2001). Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, New York.
51. Urban, J., & Jose, J. (2004a). Ego: A personalised multimedia management system. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval, Valencia, Spain.
52. Urban, J., & Jose, J. (2004b). Evidence combination for multi-point query learning in content-based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia Software Engineering, Miami, FL.
53. Urban, J., Jose, J., & van Rijsbergen, K. (2003). An adaptive approach towards contentbased image retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Workshop Content-Based Multimedia Indexing, Rennes, France.
54. Vapnik, V. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer.
55. Vasconcelos, N., & Lippman, A. (2000). Bayesian relevance feedback for content-based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop Content-Based Access of Image and Video Libraries, Hilton Head Island, SC.
56. Watts, D., & Strogatz, S. (1998). Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature, 393, 440-442.
57. Wolfram, S. (2004). A new kind of science. Wolfram Ltd.
58. Wu, L., Faloutsos, C., Sycara, K., & Payne, T. (2000). Falcon: Feedback adaptive loop for content-based retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Cairo, Egypt.
59. Wu, P., & Manjunath, B. (2001). Adaptive nearest neighbour search for relevance feedback in large image databases. Ottawa, Canada: ACM Multimedia.
60. Yang, C. (2004). Content-based image retrieval: A comparison between query by example and image browsing map approaches. Journal of Information Science, 30(3), 254-267.
61. Yavlinsky, A., Schofield, E., & Rüger, S. (2005): Automated image annotation using global features and robust nonparametric density estimation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, Singapore.
62. Yeung, M., & Liu, B. (1995). Efficient matching and clustering of video shots. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Washington, DC.
63. Yeung, M., & Yeo, B. (1997). Video visualization for compact presentation and fast browsing of pictorial content. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 7, 771-785.
64. Yoon, J., & Jayant, M. (2001). Relevance feedback for semantics based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, Thessaloniki, Greece.
65. Zhang, H., & Zhong, D. (1995). A scheme for visual feature based image indexing. In Proceedings of the SPIE/IS&T Conference on Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases III, La Jolla, CA.
66. Zhang, H.-J., & Su, Z. (2001). Improving CBIR by semantic propagation and cross modality query expansion. In Proceedings of the Conference on Multimedia Content-Based Indexing and Retrieval, Rocquencourt, France.
67. Zhang, R., Zhang, Z., Li, M., Ma, W.-Y., & Zhang, H.-J. (2005). A probabilistic semantic model for image annotation and multi-modal image retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, Beijing, China.
68. Zhou, X., & Huang, T. (2003). Relevance feedback in image retrieval: A comprehensive review. ACM Multimedia Systems, 8(6), 536-544.