메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 229-231

"Evolutionary" classifications do not have any information content-a reply to Stuessy and Hörandl

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 84900515060     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cla.12037     Document Type: Letter
Times cited : (4)

References (10)
  • 1
    • 0009573230 scopus 로고
    • The hypothesis of nonspecificity and taxonomic congruence
    • Farris, J.S., 1971. The hypothesis of nonspecificity and taxonomic congruence. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2, 277-302.
    • (1971) Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. , vol.2 , pp. 277-302
    • Farris, J.S.1
  • 2
    • 84960589752 scopus 로고
    • Formal definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly
    • Farris, J.S., 1974. Formal definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly. Syst. Zool. 23, 548-554.
    • (1974) Syst. Zool. , vol.23 , pp. 548-554
    • Farris, J.S.1
  • 4
    • 0006758333 scopus 로고
    • "Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification?": a reply to Ernst Mayr
    • Hennig, W., 1975. "Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification?": a reply to Ernst Mayr. Syst. Zool. 24, 244-256.
    • (1975) Syst. Zool. , vol.24 , pp. 244-256
    • Hennig, W.1
  • 5
    • 0031504952 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Gene trees in species trees
    • Maddison, W.P., 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46, 523-536.
    • (1997) Syst. Biol. , vol.46 , pp. 523-536
    • Maddison, W.P.1
  • 6
    • 0001885016 scopus 로고
    • Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification
    • Mayr, E., 1974. Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification. Z. Zool. Syst. Evol.-Forsch. 12, 95-128.
    • (1974) Z. Zool. Syst. Evol.-Forsch. , vol.12 , pp. 95-128
    • Mayr, E.1
  • 7
    • 0006994299 scopus 로고
    • Paraphyly and polyphyly: redefinitions
    • Nelson, G.J., 1971. Paraphyly and polyphyly: redefinitions. Syst. Zool. 20, 471-472.
    • (1971) Syst. Zool. , vol.20 , pp. 471-472
    • Nelson, G.J.1
  • 8
    • 0005624354 scopus 로고
    • Paraphyletic and polyphyletic groups
    • Platnick, N.I., 1977. Paraphyletic and polyphyletic groups. Syst. Biol. 26, 195-200.
    • (1977) Syst. Biol. , vol.26 , pp. 195-200
    • Platnick, N.I.1
  • 9
    • 84858078607 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fallacies and false premises-a critical assessment of the arguments for the recognition of paraphyletic taxa in botany
    • Schmidt-Lebuhn, A.N., 2012. Fallacies and false premises-a critical assessment of the arguments for the recognition of paraphyletic taxa in botany. Cladistics 28, 174-187.
    • (2012) Cladistics , vol.28 , pp. 174-187
    • Schmidt-Lebuhn, A.N.1
  • 10
    • 84900506809 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The importance of comprehensive phylogenetic (evolutionary) classification-a response to Schmidt-Lebuhn's commentary on paraphyletic taxa
    • doi: 10.1111/cla.12038.
    • Stuessy, T.F., Hörandl, E., 2013. The importance of comprehensive phylogenetic (evolutionary) classification-a response to Schmidt-Lebuhn's commentary on paraphyletic taxa. Cladistics, doi: 10.1111/cla.12038.
    • (2013) Cladistics
    • Stuessy, T.F.1    Hörandl, E.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.